Writing Excuses 10.48: Project in Depth, The Devil's Only Friend

Writing Excuses 10.48: Project in Depth, The Devil's Only Friend

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/11/29/writing-excuses-10-48-project-in-depth-the-devils-only-friend/

Key Points: Let's put Dan and John Cleaver on the chopping block today! (Was that a pun, Dan?) The Devil's Only Friend is book four, but think of it as book one of the second John Cleaver trilogy! The second trilogy is about John Cleaver finding out that having emotions hurts. John Cleaver is only about a year older, which helps readers because he is so different emotionally. In this book, John has a team from the FBI, but he is still lonely and isolated. Next of Kin and The Devil's Only Friend are concurrent, but told from a demon's POV and from John Cleaver's POV. Dan did not pull a Buffy with Elijah. Death of a favorite character means something to the readers. The focus of this book was intended to be disassociative identity disorder, but with Elijah and memories, it became a book about Alzheimer's. When John gets a pet, most readers are scared.
[Mary] Season 10, Episode 48.
[Brandon] This is Writing Excuses, Project in Depth, The Devil's Only Friend.
[Mary] 15 minutes long.
[Howard] Because you're in a hurry.
[Dan] And I'm not that smart.
[Brandon] I'm Brandon.
[Mary] I'm Mary.
[Howard] I'm Howard.
[Dan] And I'm on the chopping block today.
[Howard] Mwahahahaha.
Chop, chop! )
[Brandon] But I'm going to give you a writing prompt. Not you, Dan. But the audience. Because we are actually still on the boat. We don't have the audience with us for this one, but we are on the Writing Excuses cruise. So I was thinking about how environment shapes stories. I wanted to give you a writing prompt to take a story that doesn't really belong on a boat and set it on a boat. Or even one that you'd never considered and see what kind of... I should say ship because this is a ship.
[Howard] You should say ship.
[Brandon] You set it on a ship, and you see how that environment tweaks your story. I've found this a very useful way of conceptualizing stories that I'm working on. So, this has been Writing Excuses. Dan, thank you for being in the hot seat.
[Dan] Thank you very much for spending the whole episode talking about how great I am.
[Brandon] You listeners, you're out of excuses. Now go write a book as good as Dan's.

Writing Excuses 10.47: Q&A on Revision

Writing Excuses 10.47: Q&A on Revision

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/11/22/writing-excuses-10-47-qa-on-revision-with/

Q&A Summary:
Q: During revision, when do you think it's acceptable to throw the whole story out?
A: Don't submit something you don't like, but do save the file. Give it to beta readers.
Q: How do you fit the whole structure in your head?
A: You don't. Use a spreadsheet, an outline. Try a rolling synopsis! How about navigating by landmarks?
Q: What do you most often need to revise or add? Description, senses, blocking, dialogue, timing, format, etc.
A: Punchlines. Blocking and trimming. Clarity. Word choice. And all of that.
Q: What do you do when you suspect your revision passes are actually making certain things worse?
A: Snapshot and rollback. Take a break. Articulate what is wrong before trying to fix it.
Q: How long do you typically wait between finishing a first draft and revising?
A: As long as possible, which often is not as long as I would like. A month to two months. After the beta readers -- about a month. The day after the script is written.
Q: How do you avoid overwriting while doing revisions?
A: Watch for the purple prose first paragraph! Get into the character's POV. Read it aloud.
Q: When revising, do you do a pass through for theme, then character arcs, etc., and then a line edit? What comes first?
A: Goal-based, deal with the big known changes first, then smaller ones. Structure, then fine tune. Revise as I go. Figure out what kind of story it is, then do that editing pass first.
Q: What you think about taking the sound of words and sentences into account with your story? Do you think sound is not fundamentally part of the prose?
A: Sound is fundamental to prose. Readings and cadence are key. Writing conveys spoken language. Read it out loud!
 Clip, clip, snip, snip, his vorpal blade... )
[Brandon] So, Mary, how does this turn into a writing exercise?
[Mary] All right. So, the thing you should remember is that writing was developed to convey the spoken language. So this is absolutely tied in. What I want you to do is I want you to read your piece aloud. Yes. Even if it's a novel. Because you've spent an entire year working on this, in theory. You've been doing this week by week. Taking three days to read it, out loud, 3 to 4 days... And I'm a professional audiobook narrator, I know how long it takes to read a book out loud.
[Brandon] Mine might take a little longer.
[Laughter]
[Mary] Brandon's take nine days to read out loud. But still, proportionately speaking, that's not very much time compared to how long you spent doing it. The thing about reading out loud is that it forces you to interact with the words in a different way. It forces you to hear the way that... You'll find redundancies, repetitions, you'll be reading aloud and you go, "Gosh. This is really... This section goes on really long." Because you can't skim. That's the big thing. You cannot skim when you're reading aloud. If you can find someone who is willing to let you read it aloud to them, that is even better. Because when you are reading for someone, your telling them a story, and it forces you to interact with your story in a different way. So your homework assignment is to read the thing out loud.
[Brandon] All right. We are almost done with the season. One month left. You are out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.46: How Do I Make This Pretty?

Writing Excuses 10.46: How Do I Make This Pretty?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/11/15/writing-excuses-10-46-how-do-i-make-this-pretty/

Key points: How do you improve the prose, line-by-line, paragraph-by-paragraph? Did the readers say they were bored? Present the information faster. Avoid tell, then show. Cut redundancies. Maximize the delivery of a block of prose -- funniest word last, turn it upside down. Try writing one sentence per concept. Look at parallelism. Did the readers say confusing or unbelievable? Order of information, internal state? Clean up the blocking. Check the adverbs, and replace with descriptions? Add sensory details. Make sure you follow the character's attention. Tweak your paragraphing, your chapter breaks? Watch for $5 words, and make change. Replace vague words with concrete. Turn negative information into positive. Change the font, and read it again. Then cut 10%.
Cut, add, and tweak? )
[Brandon] We are out of time. But I want to give you a bit of homework here. This is actually my exercise that started with my editor teaching me to do it on my very first book, which was to cut 10% line-by-line. This is after you've already cut the scenes you don't need, and even the paragraphs you don't need. He said then go and take a page, find out how many words are on that page, and cut exactly 10% of those words. Do it for every page in your book. I don't usually do this like now in the same way. Then I got out a spreadsheet, and I just did it. I did it chapter by chapter rather than page by page. But it was so useful to me that I did it on my first three or four books, exactly 10%. Now I've got by instinct that I'll look through a revision, and I'll have cut seven or 8%, just naturally doing a polish. So I want you to do that on one of your pieces. Force yourself to cut 10%. I'll add the caveat that there are the rare writers who don't add too much in their orig... Initial draft and need to add. A lot of short story writers... Eric James Stone is this way. He actually is too sparse, and trimming 10% actually makes his writing worse. He needs to go and add 10%. But give this a try and see if it works out for you. This has been Writing Excuses. Thank you, Writing Excuses cruise members.
[Whoo! Applause!]
[Brandon] You are out of excuses, now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.45: Q&A at the GenCon Writing Symposium with Kameron Hurley, James L. Sutter, and

Writing Excuses 10.45: Q&A at the GenCon Writing Symposium with Kameron Hurley, James L. Sutter, and Michael Underwood

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/11/08/writing-excuses-10-45-qa-at-the-gencon-writing-symposium-with-kameron-hurley-james-l-sutter-and-michael-underwood/

Q&A Summary:
Q: Can you give a tip or tips on how to incorporate successfully characters or societies that are from less represented sexualities or genders or races in science fiction and fantasy when you're not from that group?
A: Look at history! I.e., research. Also, readers. Check out the alien next door. Does your world have the same prejudices? Listen.
Q: If you were an aspiring author trying to break-in right now, knowing what you know about the industry, what would you do/how would you do it?
A: Pay attention to the business, and work harder. Learn to break revision into tasks. Do everything you can to get paid for writing. It's harder than you think, and it's cooler, too. Don't depend on external validation. Keep writing.
Q: A) How do you avoid "Would you like to read my manuscript?" B) How do you critique that bad manuscript?
A: Say no. If you have to comment, try to understand where they are, and what can help them fix something and keep writing. Be honest.
Q: How much do you telegraph the plot twist before it happens?
A: Give the readers clues, but try to let them figure it out just before you reveal it.
Q: How can I, a non-writer, be the best support for a writer?
A: Be willing to read it. Give them a reader's responses. Just point to the problems, and let them fix it. Be willing to talk about plot problems and ideas. Ask why and help them get it on the page.
Q: How do you decide on the titles of your stories? Do you know the title at the beginning of your writing process, or does it come to you at some point later?
A: I let the editor or writing group do it. Strategic -- what genre, what else does Amazon already have, how can we code the key points? Sometimes it's the grain of sand that everything else accretes around. Unique, cool, but expresses what the story is.
Q: How do you know when you need to revise a second or third time or when you need to rewrite completely?
A: Trust your gut. Don't be lazy. Some writers plan on rewriting everything. Each draft is a rehearsal, and the latest draft is a performance, of the story. If you don't know how to fix it yet, be patient. Do the best you can do, but get it out there.
Tick, tock, tick, tock.... )
[Dan] We have a writing prompt coming at us from James Sutter.
[James] Yeah. In honor of the recent Pluto missions, I'm going to say take a piece of real world astronomical phenomena, something like a tidally heated planet or a tidally locked planet and make it part of the setting of a story.
[Dan] Very cool. All right. So, this has been Writing Excuses. You are out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.44: How Do I Fix What Is Broken?

Writing Excuses 10.44: How Do I Fix What Is Broken?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/11/01/writing-excuses-10-44-how-do-i-fix-what-is-broken/

Key Points: Start revision with the big stuff. Does the story work? Is the ending satisfying? Do I like the characters? Do I want to keep reading? Then think about the best solution. Before you start eating the elephant a bite at a time, outline your revision process! Make a task list. Start with whatever you bracketed (or noted) while writing that you need to fix. Then read the book yourself, and pay attention to your reader reactions. What is awesome, what is boring, what is confusing, what is unbelievable? Identify problems, then come up with solutions, to avoid cascading. Pantsers? You may need to outline the book and figure out what you are writing. Keep a list of things to change later to keep going. Let your readers suggest problems to look at. Fix it now, or fix it later? That is the question. Use search-and-replace to put brackets around a character name to help you find all the places that need fixing. Colorcode changes! Or colorcode to check balance. Try using notecards on a cork board to make the plot visible. 
Making changes? But... )
[Brandon] But we're out of time for revision. We will come back and talk about this again in a couple of weeks. But we are going to give you some homework. This was actually one that was suggested by Nalo when she was on the podcast. We were talking about revision, and she uses something like this color method, but she uses it for senses. She suggested take... Getting six colors, printing out your manuscript or just doing it on the computer screen, and highlighting... Take the six colors. There's five senses plus movement. Anytime something's moving, you'll highlight it in one color, or someone's moving. Anytime you mention a sense, mention the color appropriate to that sense. Then see how you're doing with your descriptions and see if you have enough motion going on in your story. So that's your homework. Take a chapter and do that. Take a whole book and do that, if you want to. Take a short story and do that. This has been Writing Excuses adrift. We'd like to thank our studio audience.
[Screams, applause]
[Brandon] We would like to thank Delia. Thank you so much for being on the podcast with us.
[Delia] Thank you.
[Applause]
[Howard] Outstanding.
[Brandon] You all are out of excuses, now go revise.

Writing Excuses 10.43: Q&A on Endings, with Delia Sherman

Writing Excuses 10.43: Q&A on Endings, with Delia Sherman

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/10/25/writing-excuses-10-43-qa-on-endings-with-delia-sherman/

Q&A summary:
Q: Why do so many short stories end on a tragic note compared to novels? Is tragic quote unquote easier?
A: Laziness. It's easy to get your characters into a fix and leave them there. Getting them out and solving it is harder. Not fulfilling your promises is not an artistic choice. Short stories are good at single issue cautionary tales ending in disaster. True tragic endings are difficult.
Q: How do you prevent an ending from being predictable or boring?
A: Surprise them with intensity of feeling. Play the emotional arc against the plot arc.
Q: How do you write a standalone ending with sequel potential?
A: Make the world bigger than the story, give the character more to care about than just this plot.
Q: [What are the] best ways to avoid info dump endings?
A: Make sure you and the reader are interested in all the aspects. Just cut the info dump.
Q: When writing a series, what's the most important aspect to consider in ending the first novel? Are there differences between ending the first novel in a series and ending other novels in the series?
A: Yes. When you write the ending of the first book, you don't know if you are going to write more endings. In later books, you've got more endings under your belt. You also know the overarching mega-plot. The first book needs to have a solid ending.
Q: How do you know what questions to leave unanswered in an ending?
A: Don't save too much for the sequel. Tie things up in a broken bow. Answering good, deep questions in your first book suggest more questions for later. Answer the questions that contribute to the emotional effect you want the reader to experience, don't answer the other ones. Use beta readers to decide which is which.
Q: How often do you test or rewrite the last line? How can you make sure your ending is working?
A: Leave them with an image or a phrase. A line of dialogue or short exchange can tie up a character driven emotional plot after you tie up the action plot. Look for emotional resonances and beats, then echo them. Echoing and mirroring the first line works, too. The first line is the sales pitch to get the reader to read the rest of the book. The last line needs to be pleasing and awesome to match that. Make the last line a dramatic encapsulation of a major theme.
Details, details... )
[Brandon] Yeah, yeah. We have to end. We are out of time. I really want to thank Delia for joining us. Thank you so much.
[Howard] Thank you, Delia.
[Whoo! Applause]
[Delia] Thank you.
[Brandon] I want to thank our audience, who just clapped, so I won't make you do it again. I am going to assign you homework. But it's easy homework. This time I want you to take a break. If you've been following along and working on your story, you've now been doing this for 10 months. You have finished, we hope, something incredible, something that you are very proud of. It's time to rest. This is actually something that I like to do whenever I finish a book. Because we are going to go to revision next week. It's often very good to take a break between finishing a story and digging into the revisions. In fact, you may want to take the next few episodes, stick them somewhere...
[Laughter]
[Brandon] And give yourself a break and write something in between. Then come back and listen to those episodes when you're ready to do your revision.
[Dan] Brandon, where should they stick those episodes?
[Laughter]
[Brandon] They should stick those episodes on the shelf, next to all of their nice people who don't make euphemisms.
[Mary] It wasn't me this time!
[Howard] Oh, dear.
[Brandon] And they should come back and listen to them later. All right. This has been...
[Dan] Does the sun shine on that shelf, Brandon?
[Laughter]
[Brandon] We gotta end fast.
[Mary] I don't know, that's... Oh. I'll stop.
[Laughter]
[Brandon] For those of you not benefiting from the video feed, I am proceeding to smash Mary on the head with my clipboard.
[Mary] Ah... Ee... You started it.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses of the Caribbean. You're out of excuses, now go take a break.
[Applause]

Writing Excuses 10.42: How in the World Do I Tie All This Together?

Writing Excuses 10.42: How in the World Do I Tie All This Together?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/10/18/writing-excuses-10-42-how-in-the-world-do-i-tie-all-this-together/

 Key points: Don't judge a story by its length. Symptoms first -- this ending isn't working, my story is sick! -- then diagnosis -- why isn't this ending satisfying? -- and treatment, find a fix. A common problem is unfulfilled promises. Use the MICE quotient and the Hollywood Formula to get the story started right, and then you know what you need to end with, too. Also, you may be resolving things in the wrong sequence. Make sure you get your nesting right! Beware the Brandon avalanche -- don't overlap too many resolutions in one massive twist. One great plot moment and one great character moment, fine. Three character moments for the same character... people get lost. Sometimes the character should get what they need, not what they want. Look for key elements in your story and tie those up in your ending. Don't try to tie up everything! Do try to find out what beta readers think will be satisfying -- what questions are asked, what promises are made, what did they get so far out of the story? Sometimes you need to wrap a thread up, sometimes you need to de-emphasize something. Sad, unhappy endings, where characters die -- make sure people know terrible things may happen, and give them a glimmer of success or hope even in the midst of tragedy. Heroes need to earn happy endings, and tragic endings. Did the character bring the tragedy down on themselves for some reason, or is there at least a glimmer of hope that things might work out? Foreshadow the possibility of a terrible ending, perhaps use the emotional arc of a character? Consider the setting for the sad event -- is it at a low point in the story, or is it part of a stand-up-and-cheer moment? Last word: fiction is oddly moral, we want it to make sense, people need to earn what happens to them. Life is random, but fiction has to make sense.
Is it the end, or just a new beginning? )
[Brandon] We're actually going to have Mary give us a writing prompt... Or homework.
[Mary] Right. So your homework is to take a look at the last paragraph of your work in progress, whether that's a novel or a short story, and the first paragraph. Look to see if there are resonances from the first paragraph that you can build into the last paragraph. These are the key moments that Nalo was talking about, questions that we may have answered, images that are powerful. That you can build them in, in the reverse order in which you introduced them. Or, if you have a powerful image in your closing paragraph, see if there is a place you can put it back into your opening, so that you have that resonance for the audience.
[Brandon] Excellent. Well, this has been Writing Excuses at sea. You're out of excuses, now go write.
[Whoo! Applause]

Writing Excuses 10.41: Your Character's Moral Pendulum

Writing Excuses 10.41: Your Character's Moral Pendulum

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/10/11/writing-excuses-10-41-your-characters-moral-pendulum/

Key Points: What kind of story are you telling? Is there absolute good and evil in the world? What about your characters, what are they fighting for, and where do they fall? Watching the moral pendulum move can be interesting. Also, when characters make moral compromises because of the situation, those can be fun to write. Characters who move from one end of the pendulum to the other are compelling. You nudge the moral pendulum with small compromises, use the slippery slope! Some dilemmas have both bad choices. When the moral pendulum is swinging, readers may feel frightened or uncomfortable, just like the character. When a reader finds themselves sympathizing with the antagonist, with the bad characters, they may be uncomfortable, but that's good!

[Mary] Season 10, Episode 41.
[Howard] This is Writing Excuses, Your Character's Moral Pendulum.
[Dan] 15 minutes long.
[Brad] Because you're in a hurry.
[Jaym] And we're not that smart.
[Howard] I'm Howard.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Howard] And we have with us two guests here at the GenCon Writers Symposium, Brad Beaulieu and Jaym Gates. Brad? Say hello, tell us a little about yourself.
[Brad] Hi, everybody. I'm Brad Beaulieu. I am a writer largely of epic fantasy. I had a series that came out through Nightshade Books which was a... It's called the Lays of Anuskaya. It's a Russian-inspired epic fantasy. I also have a short story collection out. My most recent news, especially here at GenCon, is that I have a new book coming out, a new series, starting with The 12 Kings in Sharakhai. It's coming out next month from Gollancz in the UK and Daw here in the US.
[Howard] Okay.
[Dan] Awesome.
[Howard] Odds are pretty good that by the time this episode airs, people will already be able to get their hands on it.
[Brad] Excellent.
[Howard] Jaym, tell us about yourself.
[Jaym] I am a writer, editor, and I do a lot of things that involve making people talk to each other when they don't want to. Also known as a publicist. I was the communications director for the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America for some years, as well as many other clients. And I'm the editor of anthologies such as War Stories, Genius Loci, and two upcoming tie-in anthologies for RPGs found downstairs, as well as a new collaboration with Monica Valentinelli called Upside Down which is flipping tropes found in science fiction and fantasy.
[Dan] Oops.

[Howard] Outstanding. Well, Brad, you pitched this topic to us, which is the idea of a character's moral pendulum. Which swings, I would assume, between black and white with gray in the middle. How do you use that metaphor as a tool? How does that work for you?
[Brad] Well, so... The reason that I brought this up in the first place was thinking about how grimdark moved on to the scene, more and more gray characters came on the scene, after having so many years, decades really, of heroic characters. There was fairly clear, sometimes extremely clear, black and white, good and evil, heroes rising up to challenge and win the day. That has changed with people like Joe Abercrombie, Mark Lawrence, George Martin, etc. So I thought it might be interesting to talk a bit about how we choose that. I think it begins when you're formulating the story itself. What kind of story is it going to be? Is there going to be absolute good and evil? I think that's maybe one of the first choices. Then, given that, what are the characters like? Are they somewhere in between? Are they fighting for absolute good or absolute evil? So I think to begin with, it advises on it just how you're going to formulate your story, what kind of story it's going to be.
[Howard] Okay. Jaym, what do you think about the gray characters, the grimdark, the absolute good?
[Jaym] I am an unapologetic antihero fan. I like all the shades of gray possible. It actually made me really happy with the recent Marvel cinematic universe version of Loki because there's a nuance there that he's actually really this fairly bad guy who frequently does good things. It's just fun to watch. So... I don't like absolute good and evil. It, to me, feels as a general rule, pat and boring.
[Howard] What attracts you to the gray stuff?
[Jaym] It's to assign absolute good or evil... I grew up in a very conservative religion, where everything was good or evil, black or white. So, for me, as I grew up and started figuring out moral codes and how the world actually works, there's just not really any way to say, "This is good. This is bad." There are absolute darknesses on one side and absolutely good things on the other side. But so much of life is just about the situation and the context.

[Dan] Now, what interests me the most about this metaphor of a moral pendulum, is not so much where the pendulum is at any given moment, but watching it move. I remember when I was a kid reading The Empire of the East by Fred Saberhagen and there was a villain in the first book of the series who became a hero by the third book of the series. I thought that was so cool. One of my favorite things to write, on the flipside of that, is a moral compromise. When a character who is convinced that she will never do this particular thing talks herself into it because the situation is like, "Well, you know, really, because of the situation we're in, I probably ought to do that." What... How do the two of you handle those kinds of situations where somebody will move from one end to the other on that pendulum?
[Brad] Well, I mean, it reminds me of some of my earlier influences. When you said that, I thought of Stephen Donaldson right away, and Thomas Covenant, right, of the extremely gray character. It was probably my first introduction to sort of gray characters, gray story. Even while there was Lord Foul, right, who was very evil, we had a very gray character along the way. Also, Celia Friedman's Cold Fire Trilogy has sort of a meeting between a priest to is clearly trying to be very good and he must team up with Gerald Tarrant, if I'm getting the name right, who's an evil wizard and does very despicable things, but he is necessary. So good and evil have to sort of come together to create sort of this broad front going forward. I think... So for me, you're right, it is very interesting to make characters go through that. They can start out trying to do the right thing, but if they stay that way all the time... I mean, change is sort of one of the mainstays of fiction. It's what makes... Part of what makes reading interesting. So yeah, I think that can help advise on what characters are going to be up against. If you can formulate them in such a way that you know their likeness, you can challenge it to make them more gray.
[Dan] I agree absolutely. I think, going right back to the grandfather of the genre, Lord of the Rings. Talk to most people about who are the most compelling characters in that series. Most of the answers you're going to get are Boromir and Gollum. Because those are the two that move from one end to the other, and often back again. That goes back to the heart of storytelling, which is conflict. Someone who is put into conflict. Now, I cut you off. You looked like you are going to have a brilliant answer to this question as well.
[Jaym] David Gemmell was one of the guys that I grew up reading. Well, I started reading while I was a teenager. He actually influenced a lot of my personal moral code, because it's... Sometimes you find yourself in a bad situation, and you just do the best you can. But he had a lot of that. People who had kind of been shiftless or who had done pretty bad things their entire life suddenly found themselves against the wall and they had to make the decision, "Well, am I going to stand and defend and probably die or am I just going to run away?" He had characters that did both things. People who had been very good, who had been shining standards of nobility, broke and ran. Those who had never stood up for anything in their lives suddenly were like, "Well, I can do this." So I think that that was probably where I really started getting into the concept. Then, more recently, Nora Jemisin's The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms. Her god figures just swing in and out, one is good and then one is bad. It's just constantly moving and shifting thing. I really like watching that because it means that you don't walk into a book that's the second or third in a series going, "Oh, I know what's going to happen. I know what these characters are going to do." It's "Hum. I wonder who's the good guy this time and how he's going to screw things up."
[Chuckles]

[Howard] I'd like to pause for a moment and address our book of the week. Jaym, you want to tell us about the Merchant Adventurer, I think?
[Jaym] So, one of my wonderful clients, Patrick McLean, as a book called The Merchant Adventurer. It is available on audible. It is an ordinary moneygrubbing merchant who finds himself being the hero, much against his will. Kind of like we're discussing. So he has to go and deal with all sorts of things and find out if he's going to be the good guy or the bad guy.
[Howard] Dan, how can our fair listeners acquire that awesome title?
[Dan] After seven years, you think I know this by now?
[Laughter]
[Dan] audiblepodcast.com/excuse. Right? Yeah! Can I get some ghosts in the audience to ooh for that?
[Ooh!]
[Dan] There we go. They... You can go to audible, you can get a free trial membership that will include a free book which could be...
[Jaym] The Merchant Adventurer.
[Dan] The Merchant Adventurer.
[Howard] Outstanding. By the way, audience... Listening audience. We're recording live here at GenCon in front of a live audience.
[Whoo!]
[Howard] And a note for our live audience. Yes, the podcast is sponsored by audible.
[Laughter]
[Howard] You may not have been expecting that, but you're going to get recommendations from our guests about things to listen to.

[Howard] I want to get crunchy.
[Dan] Yes.
[Howard] I want to get crunchy. Our listeners are writers. How do you do this well? How do you... And I'll get a little more specific. You want to nudge the moral pendulum into a darker shade of gray. What do you do... How do you do that well? How do you make it work?
[Jaym] The little things. I'm sorry, I didn't mean...
[Howard] No. Fine.
[Jaym] We both start talking at the same time. Not... You don't suddenly have someone walk out who's been good their entire life and have them kill someone. I think for a character that is... You can do that, but for a character that is swung gently into a darker shade of gray, you have them start compromising things. Say they're a good character going dark. You have them start compromising because they're protecting someone, because they're in a hard situation. So maybe they're telling a lie where they've always had this upstanding moral code. Maybe they have stolen because they really felt that they needed something or they were in desperate straits. You just start pushing them one after another. So these things start getting bigger and bigger, and suddenly they're like, "Well..." You look at it and you go, "This is not the good character that I started out with." For evil, you go the opposite ways. I'm doing something not so evil. I'm... There's this amazing comic, Looking for Group. The prot... The antagonist, Richard, is this horrible, evil necromancer and suddenly he finds himself within a group of adventurers and he's like, "Wait. I'm not being evil enough anymore." That actually plays into his arc in a huge way. It's just this slow thing that you barely see until suddenly you're like, "Wait. He's not horribly evil anymore. What's happening?"
[Brad] I think too we can... This comes down to knowing the characters well enough to challenge them, right? So you do have to understand them well enough. I think one of the pitfalls that we can run into is having characters that are perhaps not good enough or not evil enough, if that's the way that you're going. So that they can be challenged. Maybe have to look at your characters a bit honestly and say, "I need to structure them slightly differently, change their background a little bit, so they can be challenged more." So that they can be put in moral dilemmas more easily.

[Howard] One of my personal favorite tricks is to come up with a dilemma where both choices are bad. Both choices are bad and a choice has to be made. Because that happens to me occasionally, and I really don't like it. Dan, in the Serial Killer series, Cleaver, John Cleaver has a list of rules. When did he start breaking them? Because he breaks some of those rules.
[Dan] Well, yeah, that... He starts to break those rules. At first, he breaks the little ones because he is enticed by something. This is what Jaym was saying about starting with the little things. There's a serial killer in town. He knows... Part of his rules tell him not to focus on death or dead bodies, and yet someone's leaving them all over town. He kind of wants to go check out the crime scenes, he wants to see this, and he just kind of slowly steps into it. But he doesn't start breaking the really bad ones until he makes that decision. He's in that moment where both decisions are bad. Should I let this thing keep killing or should I kill it first? That is a horrible sin against the rules he set for himself, but the alternative is to let people die. So he's kind of forced into this impossible thing.

[Howard] Well, for me, one of the reasons that was powerful, and this comes back to what Jaym and Brad have been saying, was that for the series, we've been told that these rules are what keep John good. You establish these as things that he has to hold inviolate because that slope for him personally is very, very slippery. So the moment he started breaking them, I got very, very frightened. That leads me to my next question. We're almost out of time, but what is the reaction that you want to induce in the reader when the moral pendulum is swinging? What do you want them to feel?
[Brad] For me, it's discomfort. I want them to believe in that character enough so that the trouble, the decision that the character is going through, feels real. They don't know which way they're going to go, and they're... They feel uncomfortable with it until things move on.
[Howard] Ladies and gentlemen, by Brad Beaulieu's books so that you can be made uncomfortable.
[Laughter]
[Jaym] I like kind of the frightened sort of thing, where you believe in this character, you want them to be... To continue doing the thing that they been doing for whatever reason, even if it's... And uncomfortable, too. If it's a bad character, I think we like to be able to say that our enemies are bad. I mean, that's the discussion around war all the time. That person over there is bad. We're going to go kill them because they're horrible and there's nothing good about them. So when you have an antagonist who's suddenly starting to get a little bit better, you're like, "Wait a minute. What's going on here? I don't want to sympathize with him." I can't think of any examples off the top of my head...
[Howard] These aren't Nazi robots, these are kittens.
[Laughter]
[Jaym] There have been several times where I find myself starting to sympathize with the antagonist and I'm like, "This is a horrible person. I don't want to sympathize with him." So that's... I like the mix of those two things, where if it's a good character, you're frightened of them going dark. Antagonist, you're fright... You're uncomfortable that you're suddenly starting to sympathize with them. Just normal person, same thing.

[Howard] All right. Brad, I believe you have a writing prompt for our listeners.
[Brad] Yeah. Based on the subject de jure, I'm going to say find your character that is the most good, the brightest, the latest to you. Put them in a situation where they are morally challenged. But do it in such a way that the scales are almost even. So you are not pre-ordaining what is going to happen. Go into it not really sure yourself which way it's going to go, and write that out.
[Howard] Fantastic. Thank you, Jaym and Brad, for joining us. Thank you, GenCon audience.
[Whoo! Applause]
[Howard] Fair listener, you are out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.40: What's the Difference between Ending and Stopping?

Writing Excuses 10.40: What's the Difference between Ending and Stopping?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/10/04/writing-excuses-10-40-whats-the-difference-between-ending-and-stopping/

Key points: Do you just stop when you get to the right length? How do you pick an ending? "A satisfactory ending is a satisfactory destination." Sometimes we, the author, know the ending, but forget to tell the reader. Endings should fall out naturally, when you tie up enough of the plot threads to answer the question of the novel. Don't make the mistake of thinking an awesome ending, a clever line, means that you've reached the stopping point. That makes stories end too fast. Beware ending a novel on a scene, end on a sequel. Don't try to wrap up everything! Consider an epilogue. Be careful of the Harry Potter flash forward ending. 
And when the time has come... )
[Brandon] In fact, I'm going to give us some homework that is going to try to get you... You should be at your ending of your story that you've been working on as you've been listening to these podcasts. I want you to try to nudge it two directions and see if you like it better. I want you to try an epilogue where maybe you approach some of these things, a Harry Potter style epilogue, or an epilogue where you kind of... You spend a little more time with the sequel. Then I want you to try to back up. I want you to cut off part of your ending and see if you can get more of this sort of emotional resonance into the part that's left. You do this by giving clear indications of what those questions are going to be and what people are going to try in the first part of your ending, rather than kind of lingering on the second part of your ending. Just experiment with different lengths of ending for your story and see what it does to it. This has been Writing Excuses. We want to thank our wonderful audience of Writing Excuses cruise members.
[Screams]
[Brandon] We want to thank Nalo for being with us. Thank you so much.
[Nalo] Thank you.
[Screams]
[Brandon] Now, listeners, you're out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.39: Q&A on Plot Twists with Kevin J. Anderson

Writing Excuses 10.39: Q&A on Plot Twists with Kevin J. Anderson

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/09/27/writing-excuses-10-39-qa-on-plot-twists-with-kevin-j-anderson/

Q&A Summary
Q: Genre twists as a plot twist. Good, bad, or ugly?
A: Part of the audience will love it, part will hate you forever. We can learn a lot from other genres. Make sure you fulfill promises and expectations, don't undermine them. Give hints early.
Q: Compare and contrast a situation where a plot twist came off well and one where it came off poorly. What made the difference?
A: Make sure the foreshadowing is appropriate. Good plot twists add emotional weight and meaning to the story, they add depth to the characters, they make the story better than it was. They add to the story.
Q: What is the biggest mistake professional authors make when they insert plot twists into their book?
A: Sometimes the plot twist you have in mind when you start writing is not the one the story really needs when you get to that point. Let the old one go. Don't insist on making the characters stupid to support your plot twist. Make sure the red herrings are legitimate solutions that just aren't true this time.
Q: What makes a plot twist good, and what makes one actually surprising?
A: Good and surprising means that the Eureka moment for your character and your reader are at the exact same time. Let the reader figure out what the character is going to do just before he does it.
You put your right foot in, you shake it all around... )
[Brandon] I actually have a writing exercise for you. Now we've been doing a few weeks on plot twists, and we've had you write about them and things like this. We're going to be moving into endings next month, and talking about those. So your actual writing exercise is to try writing out your plot twist. Try taking it out of your story, and see if you can remove that as a big twist and kind of make it something that is known from the beginning, which is actually really hard. I've had... I've done this several times as an exercise. What you have to do is you have to make the emotional impact of the story different. Kevin has written on the Dune books. One of the things that Frank Herbert did a lot was tell you his plot twist five or six chapters before they happened, and then built the emotional tension around you knowing what's going to happen, or knowing the sense of dread instead of being surprised by it. Different emotions, the same type of concept. So that's your writing exercise. Give that a try. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.38: How Does Context Shape Dialogue?

Writing Excuses 10.38: How Does Context Shape Dialogue?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/09/20/writing-excuses-10-38-how-does-context-shape-dialog/

Key points: The context -- genre, setting, viewpoint, beats -- can change the meaning and impact of dialogue. But we don't want beats every line, either. Use beats to emphasize or to keep the reader in the scene. Mimicry, cliches, and pop culture references may cause stilted dialogue. Remember the motives of the character in this scene. Beware on-the-nose dialogue. Dialogue needs to be shaped by why the character is saying it, who they are talking to, and the function it serves for the author. Let each characters talk in their own way. People may talk in big blocks of dialogue, but that's not how we write it on the page, usually. Put in the interruptions, put in the personalities, put in the beats.
He said, she said, and then... )
[Brandon] We're totally out of time. This is a fun, fun topic. To go with it, we actually have what I think is one of the best writing exercises we've come up with for this Masters' Course. Mary's going to take you through it.
[Mary] Okay. This one is a three-parter. You do not have to do all three parts. But, if you want to, get ready. So we're going to have, on the website, a transcript of something that we call in theater an AB scene. An AB scene is just... Basically it's a script with no character descriptions, no names, nothing. Just dialogue from a character A and a character B. What I want you to do is, I want you to give us context around that. You're going to shape the dialogue. You can't change the dialogue. But you will shape the dialogue by changing the description around it. So I want you to do this, and I'm going to have complete detailed instructions on the site. But basically what you're going to do is, you're going to take the AB scene and the first time, you're going to write it in one genre. Then, you're going to do it again, and you're going to change it to a completely different genre. Then,... With like different characters, same dialogue, though. Then you're going to take the one that you like better. So this is pass 2. In your second pass, what you're going to do is you're going to take the one of the genre that you like better, and you're going to flip it to the other character's point of view, because again, that's going to change the context and the way those lines of dialogue are being perceived. You have to make everything make sense. Then you're going to flip it one more time. That last pass is, you're going to take the dialogue that's already there and you're going to remove all of it and replace it with completely different dialogue, but leave the context the same. So, as I say, I'm going to have full instructions up on the website. The AB scene is there. It will drive you a little bit crazy, but it's really worth it for getting a hang on this.
[Dan] At the risk of lengthening the episode, I had a chance to do that with the new John Cleaver book. Because there's the book, and then the novella from a different character's point of view. In one scene, I had to keep exactly, like you are talking, all the dialogue is exactly the same but we're getting a different character's perspective on it. You're right, I learned so much about how dialogue works by doing that.
[Brandon] There's a short film competition that does this. They get an AB scene, and then film a scene. The best one I've seen from one of these is one called Room Eight. I would go watch that. Then you can go watch all of the others, which are still all very good, that use the exact same dialogue, and how different each of the films are. Fantastic.
[Mary] Yeah. It's a great acting exercise. They actually had us do that at the Sesame Street workshop, too. So we were doing that with puppets.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.37: Being a Good Panelist and a Great Moderator, with Susan J. Morris and Marc Ta

Writing Excuses 10.37: Being a Good Panelist and a Great Moderator, with Susan J. Morris and Marc Tassin

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/09/13/writing-excuses-10-37-being-a-good-panelist-and-a-great-moderator-with-susan-j-morris-and-marc-tassin/

Key Points: You aren't the only panelist, work with the others to make it a great experience for the audience. Concise, considerate, and topically relevant. People remember soundbites! To be effective, plan ahead! Research, write it out, and practice. How do you get on a panel and stay on panels? Be good at something, be able to share what you know, be able to connect with strangers. The best panelists engage in conversation instead of just waiting to talk. Pay attention to the audience, the panelists, and the moderator. Moderators make the panelists shine, not themselves. Moderators should prepare, too! Know the dead spaces in the topic, know the panel and the audience. To identify the dead spaces, prepare, make notes, try questions, rehearse, and make sure this panel talks about what the audience wants to hear. You don't have to cover everything. Do set expectations from the beginning. And have a great time at Bob Con!
A panel of experts and one moderator... )
[Dan] It's our delight to have you here. Now. I believe Marc is going to give us... Send us home with a writing prompt.
[Marc] You've been invited, as an author, to attend Bob Con. All expenses paid. You arrive at Bob's house, and realize why it's called Bob Con. How do you get out of it, and how does our hero escape?
[Laughter, applause]
[Dan] Well, you are out of excuses.
[Laughter]
[Dan] So, go write.

Writing Excuses 10.36: How Does Context Shape Plot Twists?

Writing Excuses 10.36: How Does Context Shape Plot Twists?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/09/06/writing-excuses-10-36-how-does-context-shape-plot-twists/

Key Points: Plot twists means fulfill those promises! Build up to that twist, BUT keep your plot twists surprising yet inevitable. Make sure you have that moment of surprise. Don't focus on when the reader will get the twist, focus on what kind of twist are you creating and what question the reader needs to ask to guess the twist. Twists should work whether the reader figures them out or not. Think about character surprise and reader surprise. Make sure there are good reasons that the characters aren't figuring it out. Build tension around how the character is going to react more than who's going to do it or what it is. Don't just throw a plot twist in for a surprise, make it do more than one thing, make it integral to the character and plot development. Context makes a plot twist satisfying. Don't forget the red herrings! Distractions are a writer's best friend. Readers miss the middle of a list, so bury those clues. Red herrings depend on the reader assuming they know what the information means, and being wrong. Slide it in there, and give them a good reason to think it means something else. Consider the type of plot twist -- recontextualizing everything, or just a reveal? Seat-of-the-pants mystery writing? Make sure everyone could have done it, then decide in the last chapter who did it! Plot twists aren't just for mysteries -- anything that surprises your characters can be a plot twist. Pregnancy, catastrophe, etc. You can foreshadow thematically, too. Don't forget, not every story needs a plot twist, especially the "everything has changed" style. Make the twists fit your book. Shock and thrill books need different twists from comfy, cozy books. Which goes with the intensity or scale of the twist -- is it THE TWIST or just a surprising bit of information? And don't forget Chubby Checker and Chuck Berry!
Let's twist tonight, like we did last night! )
[Mary] Season 10, Episode 36.
[Brandon] This is Writing Excuses, How Does Context Shape Plot Twists?
[Howard] 15 minutes long.
[Mary] Because you're in a hurry.
[Dan] And we're not that smart.
[Brandon] I'm Brandon.
[Howard] I'm Howard.
[Mary] I'm Mary.
[Dan] And I'm Dan.

[Brandon] And we're going to talk about the context of your plot twists. Now the reason why we didn't just do a plot twist episode is because we really kind of covered this. All that really needs to be said is fulfill those promises. But I think that there is more to this topic. People like writing great plot twists, people like reading great plot twists. Plot twists don't happen in a vacuum. If you can build up what's happening around it so that it pushes towards this twist, then you're going to have a great plot twist. The big thing we want to keep in mind is the Hollywood concept, surprising yet inevitable.
[Mary] Really, the thing that people are looking for with that plot twist is the moment of surprise. But then... For them going, "Oh, of course, of course, of course. They had to do that." One of the classic examples that people hold up is The Gift of the Magi by O'Henry. O'Henry is the king of the plot twist. That is what he made his name on. So if you haven't actually read his book... His short stories, I recommend them to look at the structure of what he's doing.

[Brandon] Yeah. You want to have that moment. Now something I want to talk about here. Let me ask the rest of you. When do you, in your writing, if you were thinking of it... When do you want your reader to guess the plot twist? When do you want them to get it?
[Howard] I'm actually not allowed to worry about that. Because my readers have literally months to think about the story I'm telling online.
[Brandon] This is true.
[Howard] So... I've heard people say, "Oh, if somebody... If anybody can guess it, then I've done it wrong."
[Brandon] No.
[Howard] I realized you know what, somebody is going to guess it and may even post it in a place where I will get to read it. So I just have to let go of that. For me, what I try and focus on instead of when should the reader figure it out, is what type of a twist am I creating? Because I want to know what question the reader will need to ask in order to guess the twist.
[Brandon] No, I think that's great really. I think people can get a lot from this. I mean, this is where you say, "Luxury!" Because we can give our books to test readers, decide where they're figuring things out. If the reader on average is figuring stuff out too early, we're like, "Oh, wait. Obviously I've overplayed my hand." If they're not getting it at all, we can add in more foreshadowing. But you really should, I think, have every plot twist work even if they've figured it out. And work if they haven't figured it out. How do we do this?

[Mary] So I think there's two pieces going on there. One is that we have the character surprise, and we also have the reader surprise. So in order for it to work if the reader is not surprised, if the reader knows what's coming, the tension in the book cannot be built on the surprise of the reader. It has to be built on the characters'.
[Brandon] As an aside of that, one danger of the reader figuring it out too early is that them thinking that the characters are foolish for not figuring it out. So you need to have legitimate reasons why the characters aren't figuring this out.
[Mary] Yes. Some of those things can be things like having the character identify a list of possible reasons that X is occurring, and give them very logical reasons for picking not... For discounting the actual solution.
[Howard] When we did our episode on intrigue versus mystery... I have a small advantage, because I just listened to all of these as I prepped them for the site. When we did that, we talked about the difference between mystery, the reader doesn't know and is trying to guess, and intrigue, the characters don't know but the reader does know and we are looking at what the characters are doing. With a plot twist, where the reader has guessed it, you are up... You're in the intrigue space. The reader knows what's going on, the characters don't. You have to sell this so that the surprising yet inevitable moment, which isn't surprising for the reader, is still surprising for the characters and is fun. I'm thinking about those moments where, and I think this will air far enough out that it's not a spoiler... The moment where Vision grabs the hammer.
[Brandon] Right. Yes.
[Mary] Which I haven't seen yet, so... Great. Thanks, Howard.
[Laughter]

[Mary] But I think the thing is that when the reader is... When the reader knows what's coming, that what they're reading for, what the... The tension that you're building is the question not of who's going to do this thing, but how the characters are going to react to it. So in Of Noble Family, I have a couple of plot twists. One of which I really don't want people to know about going in. I worked very hard to make sure that I wasn't foreshadowing it in ways that would be predictable. The other one is... It's on the back cover of the book, that Jane is with child. When I was writing it, I was writing it as though it was going to be a plot twist, even though I knew that everyone would be able to see it coming. So it's a plot twist for the character because the character has an idea of how things are going to go down. This throws a wrench in what's going on. But what the reader doesn't know... Even though they know that she is with child, they don't know how that is going to affect her or how it's going to affect their circumstances. That is how you can structure things...
[Howard] You've also teased the reader a little bit by giving them something that they might look at and say, "Oh, this is the plot twist," and then they relax and stop looking... You sneaky, sneaky person.
[Chuckles]

[Brandon] Dan.
[Dan] We talk a lot about everything doing more than one thing. Plot twists are another example. If your plot twist is in there solely for the sake of surprise, it will not be satisfying. More than once.
[Brandon] Or at least not as satisfying. I personally dislike it when storytellers do this. But there are... There is a school of thought that thinks you should do that. We should acknowledge that. I remember when I was reading the bonus... Or listening to the bonus features for 24, the series. They got together and said, "What is the one thing they won't expect, the readers won't expect us to do?" I say reader. The viewer. They did that one thing. You know what, it was shocking.
[Dan] Well, see, that's great. But twists like that, and I've done twists like that as well, they still serve other functions. I think that if your reader is able to look back on your story and say, "Yup, I didn't see it coming, but there is no way the story could have been told without it." Not necessarily because it was foreshadowed and inevitable, but because what happened, the repercussions of it, are integral to the advancement of the character and the advancement of the plot.
[Brandon] I often say...
[Dan] Then it's going to feel like it fits.
[Brandon] That it's easy to make a plot twist. It's really, really easy. It's hard to make one satisfying. But you could sit down, listener, right now, and write a new scene where all your main characters die and your romance turns into a space opera... I mean, you could throw in all kinds of plot twists out of nowhere. Not satisfying at all. It's the context that's going to make this satisfying. It's the other things you're doing with that plot twist.
[Mary] One of these things that you're doing, contextually, is that you are... Some of the contextual tools that you're using are distracting the reader by other conflicts.

[Brandon] Right. Let's talk... Actually, let's stop for the book of the week. Then we'll talk about red herrings. The book of the week is I am Princess X?
[Mary] Yes. So, I am Princess X is by Cherie Priest. This is another book that I have read because I narrate it. But again, this is a book that I really enjoyed. It's great for plot twists. The... You start off the book and you're like, "Oh, this is going to be a story about girls in elementary school." Then you find out that the... Like, this is not a spoiler because it's chapter 1. Best friend dies. The book is dealing with the repercussions of that. It just keeps going down farther and farther down this rabbit hole of I was not expecting that little thing to happen. It's a lot of fun. The audiobook is... I really enjoyed narrating the audiobook. I will say that one of the differences between the audiobook and the print version is that the print version has comic books woven into it because those are integral to the plot. For the audiobook, we had to make them into radio plays.
[Brandon] Oh, that's cool.
[Mary] So, I am Princess X by Cherie Priest. That's available with a free 30-day trial membership at audiblepodcast.com/excuse. It's a lot of fun.
[Brandon] Great. That does sound like a lot of fun.
[Mary] It really is.

[Brandon] So, red herrings. Red herrings. This is one of the best ways to fool the reader. I've talked before, writers, you're stage magicians. You need to be pulling off these dramatic magic tricks with your plot twists. Now, we'll get into in a minute... Not every book needs one of these. Make sure you understand this. But if you're planning one, one of the best ways to do it is actually to look at what a stage magician does. They will keep your attention on the wrong thing so well that if you actually eliminate that thing... One of the ways to watch how a mag... A stage magician is doing their trick is to get them on the screen and put a Post-it or a piece of paper over the hand that's distracting you and just watch the other one. You'll be like, "Wow. It's right there. I can totally see what they're doing. They slip it off the table. They grab it out of there. They..." You do the same thing as a writer.
[Mary] [inaudible]
[Howard] You delete the text of the red herring, and suddenly the text that was foreshadowing the surprising but inevitable plot twist is right there in front of you.
[Mary] There's a really, really simple trick. One of my favorite tools, actually. When we're... It's in order of information thing. Typically speaking, when you're... So when you're writing... The reader is building the images one step at a time. So, typically speaking, the first thing and the last thing that the character notices are the two most important things.
[Brandon] Okay.
[Mary] So this is a focus thing, using puppetry terms. All the stuff in the middle is... Readers will kind of skim past. So if you put the actual clue smack dab in the middle of a list...
[Brandon] They won't see it.
[Mary] They won't see it, but it's still there. So like if I say, in Shades of Milk and Honey, the... I have a dueling pistol literally on the mantle in the first act.
[Chuckles]
[Mary] It's literally on the mantle. But it's in the middle of a description of how masculine the room is. The paintings, the heavy green drapes, the pistols on the mantle, the roaring fireplace, the gilded books. Whereas if I had put... The roaring fireplace, the drapes, the gilded books, and the pistol on the mantle. That's...

[Brandon] The way that plot twists... Or that red herrings work is you give information in a way that the reader assumes they know why you're giving it. That's the best way to slide this foreshadowing in, is... This idea like... I look at the Sixth Sense. Sorry, statute of limitations is over, you are going to get spoiled.
[Laughter]
[Brandon] Bruce Willis is dead. The opening scene, he gets shot. Your immediate thought is going to be, "Oh, wow. He just got shot!" But in the context, in the very next scene he meets another little boy who has like the same problem as the guy who shot him. You're like, "Oh, that prologue was there because we're showing character development for Bruce Willis, and why he takes on this difficult case with a new kid who can see ghosts." You think you know why the scene is there. If you're making your scenes do multiple things, like that scene is, then yes, you do know why the scene is there, you just don't know the other reason it's there.
[Dan] Yeah. The movie reviewer, Roger Ebert, always talked about the law of economy of characters. That you could always tell who was going to be the killer by just looking at who the famous actors were in the movie and saying, "Well, this guy hasn't done anything important yet. Obviously he's the murderer." You can... The way around that is to make sure that all your characters are doing important things. That all your characters have a reason to be in the movie that does not involve them killing someone.
[Howard] That comes back to this whole idea of contextualizing the plot twist, contextualizing everything. If the story you are telling feels like the sort of story where an archetypal kind of plot twist is going to happen, the "somebody's going to betray somebody else," and you're waiting for the traitor to show up. Your context has created the ability for you to create a perfect red herring.
[Brandon] I love red herrings that… What they do is you leave a hole. You leave a hole and the characters haven't realized something. The reader's like, "Oh, they didn't notice. This is it obviously." You put something obvious that the characters aren't getting to for a little while. So the reader's like, "Oh, I've got it figured out. I know who it is. They didn't think of... They listed off all their suspects, they didn't list this person. That person is obviously it!" Then, several chapters later, the characters like, "Oh, what about this person? Oh, it turns out they have an alibi." It yanks the rug out... Right out from underneath you.
[Mary] Yeah. Then you have forgotten some of the other things.
[Brandon] Yes.
[Chuckles]

[Mary] I think that this is Agatha Christie, but this is a really neat trick for seat-of-the-pantsers. I believe, and someone I'm sure in the comments will correct me. But a famous mystery writer, like Agatha Christie...
[Chuckles]
[Mary] Who might be someone else, was a seat-of-the-pantser. I'm like, "How do you write mysteries without...?" She would write without knowing who did it. The way she would handle it was that she made sure that everyone could have done it, and would decide in the last chapter... [Brandon] Who it was.
[Chuckles]
[Mary] Who it was. Then she would just go back and do a little bit of cleanup.
[Brandon] Right. That's perfect, and it's totally what you can do.

[Dan] Now we're talking a lot about plot twists in the context of a mystery that needs to be solved. I think that there's a lot of plot twists...
[Mary] True.
[Dan] That your characters aren't necessarily looking for.
[Brandon] Like getting pregnant. I mean, that's one that you don't necessarily need to foreshadow any more than saying, "These people are engaging in certain activities which might relate... Result in a child. Marital duties."
[Howard] Plot twists... We are having a gunfight and now the building is on fire. Well, the objective has just changed. I'm done shooting people, and it's time to run away from the flames.
[Brandon] Now, you can foreshadow these things still thematically. For instance, George RR Martin foreshadows people die in my books. So he can have plot twists were major characters are killed in seemingly haphazard ways, where you're just like, "What?" No one else would have done that, but he's foreshadowed it. So you have to foreshadow thematically for these sort of twists to work.
[Dan] With something like the pregnancy that shows up in Of Noble Family, you've been foreshadowing this is how it affects the magic, this is how it affects her society, so that it's there in your mind even though you don't necessarily see it coming.

[Brandon] Now, very quickly, we're running out of time. I do want to spend some time on the idea that you may not need plot twists.
[Mary] Yes.
[Brandon] What do I mean by that? Well, you may not need an Ender's Game style everything has just changed in the last few chapters. Oh, my goodness, I never knew what the story was about. In fact, people in my writing group sometimes, because I like endings like that, and I try to work them in periodically to my books, where you're like, "Wow. This just changed everything." I've had good friends of mine who are like, "I have to put things like that in my books. I don't have any." Then try to put them in and what happens is, they're... That's not the style of book. The thematic foreshadowing for their novel is not you don't have the ending where the guy and girl don't get together because that ruins your book. Sometimes it's okay to have the expected happen.
[Mary] Yeah. Because again, people are reading for specific effects, and if you... If you're picking up a book and you want surprises and shocks and thrills, that's a different kind of book then when you're picking something up and you want something that is comfortable and cozy.
[Dan] This is also where we should talk about the different degrees of intensity that a plot twist can have. Ender's Game, Sixth Sense, recontextualize the whole story, is on one end of the scale. But you can still have different plot twists of, "Oh, in this romantic comedy, I didn't realize that she actually is a zookeeper." Which doesn't necessarily change the entire thing, but it is going to change a certain aspect of it. So there's still surprises without being THE TWIST!
[Howard] Example from my own work with The Longshoreman of the Apocalypse. When we're trying to catch the bad guys who are doing bad things, and then we have blown a hole in the space station and we need to save everybody. That's a great example of a quote plot twist unquote that does not recontextualize the whole story. It just says we're telling an adventure story and Ah, it's just got bigger and big finish.

[Brandon] We're out of time. I'm going to give you a piece of homework. I want you to go pick a favorite piece of media. Probably easiest with a film or a short story, something you can read or experience very quickly. But it could work for a novel, too. I want you to pick one that has a great plot twist. Your favorite type of plot twist. It doesn't need to be Sixth Sense, recontextualize everything, but the type of plot twist you enjoy. The left turn you enjoy in a story. I want you to look and see how the creator of this piece of media foreshadows it, either thematically or specifically with foreshadowing. I want you to see how they use red herrings. Take that all and make a list out of it. Hopefully, this will teach you a little bit about the subtlety of doing plot twists yourself. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.35: Breaking In, with Charlie N. Holmberg

Writing Excuses 10.35: Breaking In, with Charlie N. Holmberg

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/08/30/writing-excuses-10-35-breaking-in-with-charlie-n-holmberg/

Key Points: What has changed in the last 15 years? Length is more flexible. Self-publishing is more viable now. Not as much physical book sales, much more ebook sales. Advice to writers who want to break in? Get an agent. Writing hasn't changed -- finish your book, edit it, get beta readers, and then have confidence in it. Have your pitch ready, and submit to everybody. Keep going!
Write, finish, submit, and keep submitting? )
[Brandon] So, Charlie, I'm going to put you on the spot again.
[Charlie] Okay.
[Brandon] Well, see, you did this to me every week for two years. I want a writing prompt out of you.
[Charlie] Oh, good.
[Brandon] I want a writing prompt that you can suggest that they can take and they can write their book that is going to sell them between 10,000 and 10 billion copies, like yours.
[Charlie] Okay. So, here's a writing prompt. This is something I was thinking of doing with a friend of mine. So go find a friend, and I want you guys to, without talking to each other, write down the titles of two or three books or movies that you really love. Put them into a hat and shake them up and pick out two. Your book is title meets title. Write that story.
[Brandon] All right. Excellent. Thank you, Charlie. Thank you for being a good sport. Thank you WorldCon audience.
[Yells and screams]
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.34: Q&A on Pacing

Writing Excuses 10.34: Q&A on Pacing

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/08/23/writing-excuses-10-44-qa-on-pacing/

Q&A Summary:
Q: What are early signs of pacing problems?
A: When you can't name anything that your character has accomplished towards a goal. When you are bored writing. If you, as writer, are frustrated that nothing is happening. This will be cool when I get to X -- make every scene somebody's favorite. What am I going to achieve in this scene that will make the reader feel an emotion? Why is this scene memorable? Ask a beta reader.
Q: How do you chart pacing so it happens evenly with growing tension up to climax and resolution?
A: Good question. Know how the book, and the reveals or payoffs, will end, so you know how you are going to get there. Write down your setups so you can make them coincide at the right time. Note: don't do Brandon Avalanches OR try to make everything too even. Provide a progression, and spread out your climaxes. Do Grand Prix plotting.
Q: You said before it's not always scene-sequel, scene-sequel. I just want to clarify. For faster pacing, we up the scenes and lessen the sequel, right? And the opposite for slower pacing?
A: Generally, yes.
Q: How do you handle the progression of a character over the series of a few months as they travel without the story feeling choppy?
A: Signposting, signal a jumpcut before it happens. Do include some interesting stuff that is not purely plot related! If you set up an urgent item, a ticking clock, don't jump ahead. Do signpost skipping boring stuff here...
Q: It feels like debut authors are expected to start their novel at a breakneck pace. At what point is it okay to slow down? Should the first book be 120 mph until the end?
A: Debut writers can't do what established writers do, because the readers don't trust them yet. New writers must establish quickly that "you want to read what I want to write." You don't have to have a breakneck pace, but you must remember the reader will give you less benefit of the doubt.
Q: Brent Weeks writes 300,000 word books that read like thrillers. How?
A: Short period of time, fast pacing, few sequels.
Tick, tock, tick, tock... BOOM! )
[Brandon] We are actually out of time. There were a lot of excellent questions on this. I'm sorry that we didn't get to all of them. But Howard is going to give you a writing exercise.
[Howard] We're doing plot twists next month. So let's pace you straight into plot twists, with an exercise that I like to call hard left. Take your pacing, take a scene that is moving forward at a breakneck pace. Imagine a person running or car driving fast straight ahead, and then throw a twist at them and don't break scene. Don't do the cliffhanger, don't do the page turn. Just take a hard left and roll with it. Force us to keep that pace up as we jink to the left, as we move in a new direction.
[Brandon] Take something you weren't expected to do and just run with it. Great. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.33: Combat, with Marie Brennan.

Writing Excuses 10.33: Combat, with Marie Brennan.

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/08/16/writing-excuses-10-33-combat-with-marie-brennan/

Key points: The fight should be part of the story. It should change something for one or more of the characters. Draw a map of the space. For blocking, but also to let you know what the participants can use. Concrete, specific details make combat and action come alive. Don't forget the buildup. Point of view influences what you tell and how you tell it. Don't be afraid to include an iconic moment, an awesome point. Make sure it has stakes involved, and belongs. Beware contrivances, make sure that everything has already been introduced and shown to be important before the fight. Don't forget Chekhov's chainsaw. Finally, what the characters are thinking may be more important than the blocking.
Right-cross, spin-kick, block, block... )
[Howard] Dan, do you have a writing exercise for us?
[Dan] We do. It actually relates to that exact point. What we would like you to do this week is to take a fight scene, one you have already written, one you are going to write, one you are just going to make up for the purposes of this exercise. But then, before you write it, make a list, actually write this all down. Who is in this fight, and what does each of those people want to get out of it? Write those all down. Then, this is key, write down what you as an author want to get out of the fight. So that you can have all of these various purposes in mind. Then, once you have all of those notes, write the fight scene.
[Howard] Be honest with yourself. If your reason is I want to draw a picture of a blob on a motorcycle with a chainsaw...
[Laughter]
[Howard] That goes on the list.
[Marie] That's perfectly valid.
[Dan] I mean, that's how awesome stuff happens, is when you plan awesome stuff.
[Marie] It is perfectly fair or even desirable to have multiple answers to each of those questions. If your fight is there to do many things at once, so much the better.
[Howard] Outstanding. Marie, thank you for joining us.
[Marie] Thank you.
[Howard] Fair listener, you are out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.32: How Do I Control the Speed of the Story?

Writing Excuses 10.32: How Do I Control the Speed of the Story?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/08/09/writing-excuses-10-32-how-do-i-control-the-speed-of-the-story/

Key points: Where do you put your chapter and scene breaks, and what kind of chapter and scene breaks do you use? Through scenes, with continuous action, or scene breaks (aka camera cuts, cut to black, ###)? Think about the effect on the reader -- keep them going, or give them a break for reaction? A break at a cliffhanger raises tension, a break after a revelation gives the reader a chance to react. If you do cliffhangers, make sure what they come back to is worth it. Which kind of cliffhanger -- open the door, and (BREAK), then see the centurion waiting or open the door, see the centurion waiting, and (BREAK)? Look at white space -- length of lines, paragraphs, etc. Dialogue and short action beats versus expository blocks of text. Exposition may be faster, but dialogue or quick beats reads fast, even if it takes more pages. Commas are one beat, periods two, and paragraph breaks are three beats. But. Be. Careful. Think about pacing in proportion to the length of the story you are writing. Short books, faster pace. Also check your genre! Don't forget the scene-sequel format! Also, look at whether a scene is self-contained, or leaves unanswered questions. Try putting a scene break just before they escape, just after they escape, or after they escape and find the Roman centurion waiting with the next question... the pace changes!
A ticking clock, a falling shadow, or... )
[Brandon] We are actually out of time. So we're going to let Mary give us some homework regarding scene breaks.
[Mary] Right. What I'd like you to do is take something that you've written already. We're just going to play with converting it from a through scene... Or converting it either from a through scene to a scene break or the other way around, depending on what it is. But just grab an entire chapter that has scenes in it, and take all the... Any place you have a scene break, take it out and replace it with exposition to bridge. Instead...
[Howard] A transitional sentence of some sort.
[Mary] A transitional sentence. See what that does to your pacing. Likewise, look what happens if you... When you put those scene breaks back in, look what happens if you move where that scene break is, just by a line or two.
[Brandon] Excellent. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.31: How Do I Control the Reader's Sense of Progress?

Writing Excuses 10.31: How Do I Control the Reader's Sense of Progress?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/08/02/writing-excuses-10-31-how-do-i-control-the-readers-sense-of-progress/

Key points: Pacing controls the flow of time and the progress of your characters towards their goals. Progress is an illusion that you control. You want an illusion of difficult progress toward a goal to create a satisfying ending. To control the reader's perception of progress, control the character's perception of progress. When characters feel as if they are moving, readers see progress. Characters that are trapped are boring. There's plot progress, and then there's things happening, even if they aren't advancing the plot. Be cautious of things happening. Keep it interesting, and let the reader know why. Scenes should serve more than one function. A sense of progress toward a goal is critical. Make sure you know the promises that a reader is looking for, and that you are making progress on one of those promises. What effect does the reader expect your book to have? That's the tone promise -- mystery, excitement, romance, etc. The other promise is what the reader will see happen. Tone affects expectations about promises. For pacing, match your progress to your promises. 
Step-by-step, slowly I turned... )
[Brandon] Excellent. Dan, you've got our homework this week. You were going to talk about a magnified moment.
[Dan] Absolutely. This is an exercise that I use when I talk about suspense and how to write suspense. But it applies really well to this sense of progress. The idea is that the amount of time you dedicate to a topic can signal to your readers how important that topic is. So what I want you to do is you're going to write someone gets out of bed, walks across the floor, and opens the door. But you're going to take at least two pages to do that. You have to dig deep into all of the senses. What are they hearing? What are they... What noise are they making or trying not to make? The amount of detail you put into that can signal all by itself that something incredibly tense is happening, because otherwise, he would just walk across to the door. The fact that we are taking two pages to do it is going to add so much weight.
[Howard] I already want to know what's behind the door. Jerk!
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.
[Squeaky] I'm behind the door, Howard. He-he-he!

Writing Excuses 10.30: Q&A on Middles, with Marie Brennan

Writing Excuses 10.30: Q&A on Middles, with Marie Brennan

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/07/26/writing-excuses-10-30-qa-on-middles-with-marie-brennan/

Q&A Summary:
Q: How do you prevent tedium in the middle bits without something exploding every other chapter?
A: Discovery of new things. Make the characters care about things, and make it clear to the reader why these are important. Impressive failures!
Q: In short fiction, how do you prevent try-fail cycles from resolving too quickly without adding a ton more words? Do you use yes-but, no-and for this?
A: Yes. Don't cram them in, and make your characters try harder. Try-fail should not simply reset. Keep progressing, use yes-but to make variations and complications, and watch out for Brandoning your story.
Q: If Act 2 adds a lot more to the story, new POV characters, new subplots, new locations, etc., how do you spread out the introduction of these elements so that it's not too jarring to the reader?
A: Beware of adding new POVs too late in the story. Finish a subplot, then add a character. Make sure adding the new elements is natural, not forced. Foreshadow, and let us know that new things are coming (signposts!). Don't just add POVs, subplots, and locations and never finish! Beware kudzu plots.
Q: How do I weave subplots in without them turning into outright side quests?
A: Subplots for secondary characters should not have higher stakes or more interest than the main story. Look at how the subplots intersect with the main story and the other characters. Watch for subplots, side quests, that do nothing except make the characters jump through a flaming hoop. At the end of the side quest, something should have changed! Side quests, like ties or shoes, should contrast or complement the main suit.
Q: Especially in a longer story, how important are breather chapters that ease the tension?
A: Check your genre and pacing. Fast-paced, few, slower, maybe. Don't let the tension go, just vary the tension and texture.
Q: Do you have any interesting methods for organizing, developing, and interweaving plot and subplot threads? Even after the brainstorming, outlining, prewriting, how much do you weave in your head versus what you write in your outline notes?
A: Proprioception. When you get to the end, and a character is doing something wrong, there may be a hole in the middle. Try practicing by writing a single thread, then adding threads.
Betcha can't read just one! )
[Howard] Okay. Well, Michael, thank you for the great question. We are out of time. I've got an exercise for you that should take... Not just you, Michael. All of our listeners. From our month on middles to next month on pacing. I call this murdering the middle darling. You've worked your way through the middle. Go back into it, and remove an element from the entire middle, and see how that changes the read of things. See if that was really necessary to get you to the ending. Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. The easiest way to find out is to kill it. So, you're out of excuses. Now go write.

Writing Excuses 10.29: Why Should My Characters Fail Spectacularly?

Writing Excuses 10.29: Why Should My Characters Fail Spectacularly?

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2015/07/19/writing-excuses-10-29-why-should-my-characters-fail-spectacularly/

Key points: Middles are usually about failures. Struggling and failing, then succeeding is satisfying. Spectacular failures build sympathy. Try-fail cycles, but consider yes-but or no-and. Yes, success, BUT now things are more complicated or no, failure, AND there's this other little twist... Things get worse! Start with your ending and mirror that into earlier events. Try-fail cycles should prepare you for the ending, and are related to the goals from the beginning. Be careful about checklist mentality, always doing three try-fail cycles. Stories should feel organic, so use the tools to assess and fix problems, not as straightjackets for your stories. Make your try-fail cycles do more than one thing. Beware plot bloat, with conflicts adding complications -- make sure your conflicts are related to the central story you are telling.
Try again, soldier! One more time! )
[Brandon] We are out of time. We will talk more on this topic in upcoming podcasts, where we dig into pacing. But for right now, Mary has homework for you.
[Mary] Yes. So we are going to play with the yes-but, no-and try-fail cycle. What I want you to do is to look at the next conflict your character is facing and just think of the smartest thing they can do. Then start a yes-but, no-and cycle. Just for purposes of exercise, try it as a three cycle. So they're going to fail twice before they succeed. You can decide if they... If you have two yes-buts or a yes-but and a no-and. But each time they try, that thing needs to get worse.
[Brandon] Excellent. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.