mbarker: (BrainUnderRepair)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 17.34: Developing Subtext
 
 
Key points: Text, subtext, and context. The words on the page, the layer of meaning underneath that, and what's going on around the words. How do you provide the clues to let the reader get the subtext? Body language, character interpretation. The emotional charge in what's being said. On the nose!
 
[Season 17, Episode 34]
 
[Dan] This is Writing Excuses, Dialogue Masterclass Episode Seven, Developing Subtext.
[Mary Robinette] 15 minutes long.
[Maurice] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're between the lines.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.
[Maurice] I'm Maurice.
[Howard] And I'm Howard.
 
[Dan] Awesome. So. We are going to talk about subtext today. I think the very first question I want to ask you, Maurice, is what is subtext?
[Maurice] So, subtext. So, when I think about subtext, so… I'm going to try a math analogy here, so bear with me. So dialogue operates in three dimensions. There is text, subtext, and context. So the way I think about it is text is like the words on the page, subtext is the layer of meaning underneath the words on the page, and context is what's going on around those words. So when I think about subtext… I mean, we all intuitively understand subtext, because if I come home and my wife is on the couch watching TV and I go, "Hey. Is anything wrong?" And she says, "No! Everything's fine!" Like, my Spidey senses are going to go off. Just on an intuitive level. I know something's going on, but the words on the page were "No, everything's fine." Yet I know, because of context and subtext, yeah, maybe everything is not fine. So that's what I think about… That's one way I think about subtext.
[Dan] Yeah. Subtext is very useful in a lot of different ways. There's a lot of things that you can accomplish with it. You can say things without coming right out and saying them. You can have the characters inferring and implying things. You can even get around various censors, is some of the ways that I've used subtext in the past as well. So it's a useful dialogue tool because if you can pack something with a subtext, you can… It becomes very information rich. Right? The same things are being said, but we understand much more than just the words that are being said. So I guess the question is how do you do that? How do you imbue something with this extra hidden meaning?
[Mary Robinette] So I want to use what… The framework that Maurice has already set up, which is that there is the text, subtext, and context. Subtext, and this is important, exists between the text and the context. You cannot have subtext without having context to compare it to. So here's an example which I think I have used before. So I come from the American South, which is what is called a high context region. So high context culturally means that in order to participate in the conversation, you have to have a lot of context, because so much of it happens subtextually. So these are examples like the American South, large parts of Asia, Brazil as I understand it, will have big parts of the conversation that everybody understands, but is not actually said out loud. So, my husband, by contrast, comes from a low context culture which is you just say things directly without much subtext. So here's the actual conversation. My mom says, "There's a bag of apples on the counter in the kitchen." I reply, "Oh, okay, I can have a pie made for dinner tomorrow night." My husband's like, "Wait a minute. Where did the pie come from?" I'm like, "Well, she just said that there's a bag of apples on the counter in the kitchen." Because to me, contextually, this is very clear based on the relationship my mom and I have. All of the subtext in there is "I bought a bag of apples. If you have time to make a pie, it would be really great, but I don't want to put you out." I'm like, "Oh, making a pie sounds awesome. I don't have time or energy tonight, but I could do it tomorrow night." But you only get the pieces of dialogue on either end of that. "There's a bag of apples on the counter in the kitchen." "Great, I can have a pie for tomorrow night." My husband is like, "Wouldn't… Don't you think she was just offering you an apple?" I'm like, "No. Because then she would have said do you want an apple, or, more likely because high context society, she would have just brought me apples to avoid the other conversation which is would you like an apple? No, thank you, I couldn't. Really, they're very fresh. No, seriously, I just can't take an apple. But these are apples that were picked at my grandmother's farm. Oh, well, in that case, of course I'd love to try an apple." So when you're thinking about this, this subtext, you have to think about the context that goes around it. Because… This is the other fun thing, people will read the subtext based on their cultural understanding of how subtext works. They will bring their own context to the conversation. So if I said to my husband there's a bag of apples on the counter in the kitchen, and he didn't… Well, actually, I would never say that to him because I know that he… Let's be clear, I know that he does not have the context. But, if I were writing a novel and I wanted to make things awkward, then my character would just say that, and then my character would get mad because he didn't read the subtext. Which would be very clear to everyone there. So, thinking about the subtext as the unspoken part that is kind of held in suspension between text and context.
 
[Dan] Okay. So let me follow this up. Let's say that you were going to put into a book that conversation with your mother. How would you provide the right contextual clues to let a non-Southern audience understand what was really going on?
[Mary Robinette] So this is where you have to use the non-spoken… The other pieces of dialogue. So we've been talking about dialogue as the lines that are said out loud. But there's also all of the other pieces. There's body language, and then there's the character's interpretation of the line that is said. So this is where you would deploy something like free indirect speech where the character interprets it as part of the narrative or… So that my character might think, "Oh, I know that mom really wants a pie. So that's why she's mentioning the apples." Or, actually, if it's free indirect, "She knew that her mother really wanted a pie. She didn't have the energy to do it that night. So she made a counter offer. I could have a pie ready tomorrow night."
[Dan] Awesome.
[Howard] Yeah. In thinking about the pie thing, it occurred to me that the way the apples are described tells you whether or not they are pie apples or eating apples.
[Mary Robinette] In a bag.
[Howard] There's a bag of apples on the counter is pie apples.
[Mary Robinette] In the kitchen.
[Howard] I've… In the kitchen on the counter. Yeah, I've… Bag of apples in the kitchen. I put apples and the fruit basket on the counter is I found some apples that I think you will love and I have set them in this basket and I would love for you to try one because we have this thing about artisanal apples and eating them and whatever. It's the difference between the bag in the basket.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. Context.
 
[Dan] Okay. Let's pause for the book of the week, which, Maurice, this is you this time.
[Maurice] Yeah. So, it's a book… It's not out yet. I believe it comes out early 2023. It's called The Lies of the Ajungo. It's by Moses Ose Utomi. So, it's a novella. I've read this novella twice already. I really love it. I'm just going to read the back cover copy for you real quick. "In the City of Lies, they cut out your tongue when you turn 13 to appease the terrifying Ajungo empire and make sure it continues sending water. Tutu will be 13 in three days, but his parched mother won't last that long. So Tutu goes to his oba and makes a deal. She provides water for his mother, and in exchange, he'll travel out to the desert and bring back water for the city. Thus he begins his quest for salvation for his mother, his city, and himself." The great thing I love about this book is this book moves at the speed of fable. If that makes sense. Moses has a way of just weaving magic into his… All the lines in this book. So, like everything has a certain weight to it, on top of just the lush language that he uses. So I've really enjoyed this book, obviously, twice. It's just I love the magic that it just… This book is just imbued with.
[Dan] Cool. That is The Lies of the Ajungo by Moses Ose Utomi. That'll be out next year, in 2023. So look for it then.
 
[Dan] Okay. So, let's talk some more about subtext. Howard, how are you able to put subtext into the work that you do?
[Howard] In comics, it's actually pretty easy. Because you can have a dialogue bubble whose words disagree with, at least on the surface, the facial expression, the body language, of the character. I didn't have to use words to describe how the character was standing. I can just communicate all of the body language with the dialogue, and the subtext is right there. In prose, it's something that I've had to learn, and it's something that I've actually had to back off of a little bit because I can see… When I'm writing, I can see the way people are talking, the way they're… The things their faces are doing, the things they're doing with their hands, and I have to decide which of it is important and which of it is not. Because I'm capable of describing all of it, but it really slows down a scene when I do that. So, for me, subtext is an exercise in… It's like an exercise in risk reward management. Which of these little bits of body language can I describe for the most impact, and which do I just need to let slide because there isn't enough page.
[Mary Robinette] The other thing that you just said that I want to keep up to this is body language and seeing them interact. But sometimes what the subtext is is not a specific line that I just didn't say out loud. Sometimes the subtext is just a mood. That the subtext is this character is annoyed all the way through this scene. Because there's what's called direct versus indirect communication. I referred to this earlier, direct is, "Will you pass the salt?," indirect is, "Is there salt?". Even more indirect is, "Oh, this soup is a little bland." Although…
[Howard] Oh, that's direct.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah, that is direct.
[Chuckles]
[Mary Robinette] Actually, that's… Scratch that. Those are fighting words. Unless you're [garbled]. But thinking about, when you're crafting that subtext, thinking about your character's emotional state is also going to really express… Really help you guide how that happens.
[Maurice] Yeah. So I think…
[Dan] Uh… Oh, okay, go ahead Maurice.
 
[Maurice] One of the ways I think about subtext is, just like Mary Robinette said, it's like subtext is the emotional charge underneath what's being said. Right? A lot of times, as you're seeing the scene, the characters, they're going to betray what they're really feeling in some subtly different ways. Right? What… Again, I'm a TV junkie, but one of the shows I watch, one of the police procedural's I watch which really helped me out a lot in this was a show called… It only lasted like three seasons… Called Lie to Me. It was based on a book by Paul Ekman. I think he wrote a book called Telling Lies. But it's all about micro-expressions. Right? So, just watching how they would explain how micro-expressions work, all of a sudden I'm just like, "Oh. Hang on." So now I am getting to see just the direct correlation between what the body betrays about what a person's really feeling and now I'm able to convey that in the text. So for us as writers, it's like oh, I don't need as many dialogue tags if I'm writing their physical reaction to something. What was their physical reaction? What was their facial expression? What other kind of body language are they betraying with what's being said in the moment? So that's one of the things that helped a lot.
[Mary Robinette] So, while we're talking about this, I actually want to talk about the opposite of subtext, which is on the nose. Because one of the flaws that you'll see sometimes with early career writers or published writers to is that you'll read something and be like, "Wow, that's really on the nose dialogue." What that means is that the character is saying exactly what they're thinking in the moment without any subtext at all. It is exactly serving the plot in that moment. There's no tension, there is no… It's just statements…
[Howard] There's nothing to unpack.
[Mary Robinette] That are not… There's nothing to unpack at all. It's fine for a character to do that occasionally. But if you have a string of it, where everyone is doing that, that's where you wind up with on the nose dialogue.
[Dan] Yeah. The… Both on the nose dialogue and subtext can be very useful tools culturally. So for… A good example of on the nose being very good, I just watched a movie from India called RRR. It's about two guys, two revolutionaries in the early 1900s in India who end up meeting each other. Then there's a song, because it's an Indian movie and they have songs. They have a whole song where the lyrics are as on the nose as it could be. These two guys just met each other, now they're best friends. Even though one of them is secretly working against the other one and doesn't realize it. Like it's… The whole plot of the movie just described to you by a guy singing a song. Culturally, that's really valuable, because I don't… I'm not a part of that culture. There are nuances to their interaction into their relationship that I would have missed without that song to say, "Hey. Gringo who's watching this, let me explain some stuff to you." At the same time, subtext can be really useful for cultural reasons as well. Some of the write-for-hire stuff that I have written… In one, for example, I wanted to make two of the characters gay and they did not let me for corporate reasons. They're like, "No. We will not allow that. We're not going to have gay characters." So I was able to make them clearly gay in subtext so that someone looking for it will be able to see it and someone who doesn't want that in their fiction doesn't have it. That kind of stuff is so useful as a way of giving your audience the kind of stuff that they need. The ability to see yourself in fiction, especially for marginalized groups, often comes through subtext because we can't say it out loud.
[Mary Robinette] Just, again, to underline what Dan is talking about, the thing is that those clues are there for someone who has the right context, and is looking for it.
[Dan] Absolutely.
[Mary Robinette] But for someone who does not live in that context, they aren't there. Also, I think that we should all acknowledge that the corporate overlords are in the wrong in that particular case.
[Dan] Absolutely. That was the subtext of my statement. Yes.
[Mary Robinette] Yes. I was saying the quiet part out loud for you.
[Dan] Thank you very much.
[Chuckles]
[Howard] Very on the nose.
 
[Mary Robinette] Yes. So. Let's slide into our homework. I want you to… We're going to force you to develop subtext. I want you to take a work in progress… If you want to grab that transcript that we had earlier, that's also fine. But grab a scene with dialogue where you understand what's going on in that scene. As a writing exercise, I want you to just delete every third line, regardless of who's saying it, regardless of how important it is. I just want you to delete every third line. Then go back and try to use nonverbal cues to make the dialogue still make sense.
[Dan] This is Writing Excuses. You are out of excuses. Now go write.
 
mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
 Writing Excuses 13.33: Reading Outside the Box
 
From https://writingexcuses.com/2018/08/19/13-33-reading-outside-the-box/

Key points: To understand what you are reading about another culture, start by understanding the culture. Ground yourself with a good spread of writing by people from inside the culture. Try reading nonfiction. Culture is not a monolith, it varies from place to place, even within a single family unit. Think about how many things your neighbor gets wrong. Read things produced for the culture by people from that culture. Read advertisements! Be aware of subtext and context. Be cautious about what you think you already know about a culture. Watch for evolution and time. 
 
Plenty of discussion to follow... )
[Dan] This is Writing Excuses, Reading Outside the Box.
[Mary] 15 minutes long.
[Aliette] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Mary] I'm Mary.
[Aliette] I'm Aliette.
[Howard] I'm Howard.
[Dan] And we are currently trapped in a floating box in the Baltic Sea, but it is okay because we are here with wonderful special guest Kristie Claxton.
[Kristie] Hello.
[Dan] Awesome. Kristie, tell us very briefly about yourself.
[Kristie] I am a POC writer. I… In my typical day job, I am a mom to about nine people…
[Chuckles]
[Kristie] During the day, then I go home and I'm a boss to four people.
[Laughter]
[Dan] Very well put. Awesome. You're also a writer as well.
[Kristie] I do write. I typically… I typically submit to a lot of contests and pray that someone will notice how great I am. It doesn't typically happen, but sometimes I do. Right now, I'm writing a thriller about a con woman who comes to meet her… The fiancé of her deceased daughter, and she is picking up the con that her daughter had started.
[Dan] That sounds awesome, and I'm excited to read it. Cool. Well, we are happy to have you here, Kristie.
 
[Dan] We want to talk today about a question… We're currently on the Writing Excuses cruise… The retreat… And in one of the classes that Aliette taught yesterday, a really good question came up and we said, "We are totally going to answer that in an episode, because everyone needs to hear this." The question was, basically, if I remember correctly, "How can I know when I'm reading about a different culture, that what I'm reading is accurate and respectful and well done?" So, Aliette, what would you like to… Where would you like to start us on that answer?
[Aliette] Well, I think the… If you really want to have an idea of whether something is respectful or not to a given culture, then you need to actually understand what the culture is. To get a good grounding on what that culture is, then you need to read as much as possible that comes from people inside the culture, so that you have a good reference for okay, this is what's happening. You also want to get a good spread, because cultures are going to be… Like, no culture is a monolith. You're going to get very different perspectives. Like, for instance, in Vietnam, if you go… It's still happening to some extent, North Vietnam, south-central Vietnam, and South Vietnam are going to be very different entities, and of course, you know, every province have their own. So you have to get a sense of, like, every author is going to have their different biases. It's really hard. I mean, especially if you're coming from outside, it feels very much like you're staring at a wall of everything that feels similar, but as you read more and more, you become more aware of how things are playing out, and how someone's… Someone may have prejudices against their neighbor, and the neighbors might give it back to them. Then, when you have… I think when you have that sort of grounding, then you can start getting a sense of whether the story that you're… The one that you're actually reading actually makes sense from that culture's perspective.
[Howard] The thing that I've found, and I think I first discovered it when I was reading The Black Swan by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, who is a Syrian Christian. In his descriptions of… The book is about how we tell ourselves stories in order to make the world make sense, but our stories are wrong. Our stories create a narrative, and then reality will deny that narrative with the introduction of an element that he would call the black swan. But in reading it, he told… He shared anecdotes from his life. It's a nonfiction book. I learned things about the Syrian Christian community, which was a thing that I didn't even know existed until I picked up that book. In picking up that book, I recognized that the void in my own life was, one, I'm not reading enough nonfiction, and, two, I'm not reading enough anything written by people who aren't me. So the filter that I see on fiction, whether or not the people are from my culture, is that fiction is when we make stuff up, and if I'm from outside the culture, I can't tell if they're making up things or if they're reporting things correctly. So I start… Boy, I hate to lay this at everybody else's feet, because I haven't done it well yet, but if you read nonfiction from people who aren't you, you are more likely to get the straight story that will then help you judge the fiction that you read.
[Aliette] Why do… I don't know if we really get the straight story, because… I mean, we all tell stories, that's how… I mean, one of the things that I was talking about in the course is that when you have family histories and family stories, for instance, no two people are going to give you the same explanation of what went down on Aunt Bea's wedding, right?
[Laughter]
[Aliette] So, whenever you tell a story that's a bit the same, you're telling it from your perspective. But I agree that with nonfiction, you don't have the filter of I have to make up this to be entertaining, to follow certain conventions, so memoirs are fine. Like, one of the memoirs that I always recommend very heavily is Andrew Pham's Under the Eaves of Heaven, which is about his father's life in Vietnam from around the 1950s to when they settled in America, after the Vietnam War. It's a really interesting piece about, like, that section of Vietnamese history seen through the eyes of his father, and seen through the eyes of the sun as well, so you really get that sense. I think it's a really interesting thing for getting the sense of the life of both the father and the son.
 
[Mary] I think that's a really good point that you make about the fact that… We always say culture is not a monolith, but it's not just, "Oh, people who are coming from here have a slightly different…" Like, I'm from the American South, and my family is East Tennessee. I grew up in North Carolina. There are cultural differences between the two places. But it's not just that, it's even within a single family unit, you will have these differences. Kristie, you and I were talking yesterday a little bit, and you had some… Right after Aliette's class, and you had some things to say.
[Kristie] Well, I think it's very important not to just take one point of view or read just one thing. I'm from the American South. My family is from Tennessee. Southern Tennessee.
[Mary] Whereabouts?
[Kristie] Right before the border of Georgia.
[Mary] I'm from Chattanooga.
[Kristie] I do not… Okay. Yes.
[Chuckles]
[Mary] We are…
[Kristie] Kissing cousins. I didn't grow up in Tennessee. My father was in the military. I've lived all over the place. I do not have the same experiences as someone from the… Someone who's lived in the South for any long period of time. Because I've lived in the North, we've lived in Germany, we've lived out West, I've lived… I've spent the majority of my time in Rhode Island. However, I've lived a completely different life than someone who has spent all of their time in Tennessee. So you can't just take one point of view or one story or one… You can't just interview one person and think, "Oh, I just know everything there is to know." That's… No.
[Chuckles]
[Kristie] Next to impossible.
[Mary] I mean, just think about how many things your neighbor gets wrong.
[Chuckles]
 
[Dan] Yeah. Let's pause right now for our book of the week, which Kristie is going to tell us.
[Kristie] I recently read Warlock Holmes: A Study in Brimstone. It is a retelling…
[Laughter]
[That is so fabulous]
[Dan] Which is too perfect to not have already existed. That's amazing that… Okay. So tell us about it.
[Kristie] It is a retelling of Sherlock Holmes and he has taken the majority of Sherlock Holmes' stories and just made them supernatural. Where Watson is the logical deductive reasoner, and Warlock Holmes is the one who is using magic to solve the mysteries.
[That's great.]
[Kristie] There is also a sequel as well. 
[Dan] That's fantastic.
[Kristie] The Hell Hounds of Baskerville.
[Laughter]
[Dan] Who… Who's it by?
[Kristie] You… No.
[Mary] That is something that we will Google and include in the liner notes.
[Dan] Excellent.
[Mary] We're on a ship…
[Howard] If you can remember Warlock Holmes, you've got it. If you can't remember Warlock Holmes…
[Aliette] Maybe it's not the book for you, right?
[Laughter]
 
[Mary] But since we are talking about books, one thing that I want to say is that when you're looking for… Since this prompt is for… This began from the what should I be reading. One of the things that I would say… Encourage people to do is read not just fiction and not just nonfiction, but making sure that you're reading things that are produced for that culture by people from that culture. So magazines are actually really useful, and not just I'm going to read an article here or there, but actually read the entire magazine, cover to cover, including the advertisements. Because what people are trying to sell to other people within their community is really telling. Like, what do we sell on this podcast? We sell books that are science fiction and fantasy, predominantly, because that is who our community is. We also try to sell you that we know what we're talking about.
[Chuckles]
[Howard] Jonathan Coulton's song SkyMall, where he deconstructs the SkyMall magazine on airplanes and sings from the point of view of a SkyMall shopper… I wept when I listened to it, because he turned that high-end consumer life into something just so empty, and yet so full of wonder. Yeah, you read SkyMall and you think, "Who are these people?"
[Laughter]
[Howard] "These people are not me. Who are these people?" SkyMall's not a great example, because it's trying to advertise to a cross-section of people with more money than sense, but any magazine will fulfill this in different ways because of... With the advertisers, because of that desire to feel a need they have.
 
[Aliette] I do want to caution this… That's why I was talking about grounding, which is a lot of these things are going to have subtext that you're just not going to see. The example I always take for this is there's a series of short stories that are set during the Ming dynasty, and for the life of me, I can't… It's Stories to Warn the World [Stories to Caution the World?], and then i can't actually remember the name of the author. But I remember being very struck because at one point, a woman crosses the street, very slowly, very daintily, and there's a lot of description… It's like two sentences of description or something. The subtext is she would have had bound feet, and that's why she was crossing the street so slowly. If you don't know this, then you'll just miss it. It's the same with like, a lot of… For instance, the Vietnamese magazines are going to have… I saw one that was for a shampoo brand, because there is a tem… [Garbled] it was based on a Vietnamese fairytale, where one of the characters actually gets the other out of the house under the pretext of washing her hair. If you don't know that this is a reference to this particular fairytale, then you're like, "Oh, this is nice, but…" You kind of… You don't have the vocabulary. It's like when you're learning a foreign language, and all those proverbs are like, "I'm sorry, what does that mean exactly?"
[Dan] That's a really good point, that sometimes without context, you can miss a lot of those clues. One of the cultures that I love to read and to read about is South American literature. One of my all-time favorite authors is Isabel Allende. If you have the chance, for example, Allende writes for both a Chilean audience and for an English-speaking audience in different books. It's fascinating to read both of them and compare what is she emphasizing when she's writing House of the Spirits versus some of her stuff that's written in Spanish. So if you have the chance to compare two works like that, and see what gets emphasized or what gets left out, that can tell you a lot about those contextual clues.
[Kristie] I just wanted to mention using vernacular because I think a lot of… I… Like I said, I spent a majority of my time in Rhode Island. There are a lot of things that are specific to New England that I know about, that someone may not pick up if they're from, say, the South or the Northwest or even from another country. I think that's one of the biggest things around here that, with Writing Excuses, is that we're trying to be everything to all people. Sometimes you can get that. And sometimes you can't. You have to be very careful about how you put it when you're doing it.
[Howard] I've found that the best I can hope for personally is to be honest about myself to all people, and to be honest about what I don't know when I'm trying to tell stories that involve other people. Because the older I get, the stupider I get.
[Choked laughter]
[Howard] The less I know that I know. Does that make sense?
[Mary] I want to say, on that note, that one of the things that you have to be most cautious of, the thing that I would encourage you to do is that… The things that you think you know about another culture are the things that are all… Those are the things where you are at the biggest risk of getting it wrong. Completely and totally wrong. I was writing a novel that was set in theater in 1907, and I'm like… I was researching the clothes, the hats, streetcar timetables. Didn't do any research on the theater, because I've spent 25 years in the theater. Dress rehearsal. Not a thing. Tech rehearsal. Not a thing. There were all of these historical mistakes that I was just making right and left. So, also, when you are… Along with that, remember that cultures evolve over time. So it's not enough to just be like, "This is the way it is now." How was it 10 years ago, 15, 50 years ago? Because that evolution is also going to tell you a lot about conflict points between characters. So when you're trying to write another culture, it's not fast research.
[Kristie] No. It definitely is not fast research, and you have to pay attention. Because my mother will say something that does not translate to what I think at all.
[Chuckles]
[Kristie] When my mother goes into a store, they're following her because she's black. When I go into a store, they're following me because they want to sell me something.
[Laughter]
[Kristie] So you've got to be… You've got to take all stories as much as possible. Unless you're truly trying to say something just from one person's point of view, from the South. You can tell that story.
[Howard] A couple of things that I think are worth watching. One of them hasn't come out… One of them hasn't come out yet, and that's Marvel's new Black Panther movie. Which has a black director and a largely black cast. They are… They appear to be trying to do justice to a lot of these cultural things. The original Black Panther comic book did not do any of that. So it'll be fascinating to see what they come up with. The other was the Netflix Luke Cage, which I, as a white dude, watched and I could tell I am missing inner-city cultural note…
[Laughter]
[Howard] After inner-city cultural note. I know there is context I don't have, but I was… There were tears in my eyes as I realized there is a huge library of knowledge here I don't have, but other people are getting it and they didn't used to get this from TV. They didn't used to get this. I've watched it a couple of times now. I still don't understand it. So the trend of native voices producing things, there's no substitute for that. There's no substitute for that. Consuming that is the only way I'm going to approach any sort of knowledge.
 
[Dan] All right. This has been a really good discussion. Mary, you have our writing exercise, our thing for the end of the episode.
[Mary] Right. I'm going to give you homework that I actually did. This is a year-long project. Because, as we've said, this is not simple. This thing of learning to write outside of your box. What I want you to do is I first want you to identify your box. This is tricky. There are two ways you can do it. One is you can categorize yourself by census records. So, like, I'm a white woman, American white woman. The other thing you can do is walk over to your bookshelf and look at your bookshelf and categorize the patterns that you normally read in, specifically, since we're talking about life experience and lenses, specifically the kinds of authors. Their background. So I did this and discovered that despite all of my feminist rhetoric, I was tending to read mostly men. And tending to read mostly white American men. So I spent a year in which I said, "Okay. I'm not going to read white American men." Specifically, I'm not going to read white Americans. I'm not going to read American fiction for a year. That was the box. Because I had already experimented with not reading… Not reading white people. Some of my best friends are white people, but…
[Laughter]
[Mary] I still identified that pattern and spent a year reading fiction from people who were from Europe, from Asia, from Africa, from Australia, and people who were not white. The things that I discovered about my own defaults have made me a significantly better writer. Because you don't realize the defaults that you have until you start reading fiction by people who do not come with the same set of defaults. So it's a long project. You're still allowed to buy books by other people, but I just want you to put off reading them for a year. Part of the reason is the first month that you're doing this is about deprogramming your brain, and learning to read outside of that box.
[Howard] The first book will be a real hurdle and be really tricky. But this doesn't start to pay off until book three.
[Mary] Three, six… Three or four was when I started to realize what was happening to my brain. It's very useful. No matter which box you find yourself in.
[Dan] Awesome. This has been Neurological Hacking Excuses.
[Laughter]
[Dan] You are out of excuses, now go write.
 
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 11.39: Elemental Relationships Q&A, with Greg van Eekhout

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2016/09/25/11-39-elemental-relationship-qa-with-greg-van-eekhout/

Q&A Summary:
Q: What is your favorite way to establish relationships? Is it through dialogue or is it through background or is it through narrative? How is it?
A: Dialogue, because it can quickly establish the relationship. Action, because it shows characters that know each other well.
Q: How do you recover when a relationship between a hero and a supporting character starts to feel forced?
A: Throw something in that messes up expectations. Banter.
Q: How do you show a best friend relationship?
A: The same as for a romantic relationship, intimacy in dialogue and a degree of physical comfort with each other. Leave out the gaze. Best friends stay together even when they fight. Best friends are the ones who are still there after everyone else leaves.
Q: When doing romance, how do you decide to move fast or slow?
A: It depends on the kind of book. Erotica? Jump in fast and stay there. Others, much more slowly.
Q: Do you try to make the nature of the relationship between characters clear, or do you often leave things to subtext? Do you use different techniques to write different types?
A: Yes. Relationships in Schlock Mercenary depend on whether people like working together, and on relative rank. How close characters are governs how much subtext you use.
Q: How do you approach writing a relationship with a transsexual character without making it stiff or unnatural?
A: Deferred. Talk to people who have primary experience.
Q: What are your favorite relationships to write?
A: Happy marriages. Functional families. New friendships. Prickly antagonists. Working relationships where characters are discovering each other's competencies.
Q: How do I write a starting relationship, a friendship or things between two characters that the reader doesn't even know well yet? How does someone start off with that?
A: What do the two characters need and want? Similar, so they work together, or opposed, so they work against each other? Either way, use banter as they explore how they are going to interact.
Q: How do you transform love into hate and vice versa?
A: Time. Money. Betrayal.
Q: When writing a love triangle, how do you keep from making it obvious the final couple ahead of time?
A: Make them both plausible choices.
Q: Recommendations for books that focus on familial friend relationships rather than romance.
A: The witches in Terry Pratchett's Discworld. Mother-daughter in A Wrinkle In Time series Nancy Drew and her dad, Monica Mars and her dad.
Relationships mean never having to say you're sorry? )

[Brandon] Well, why don't we end with a writing prompt instead? Greg, you've got a writing prompt for us.
[Greg] Yeah. How about take a look at the actual place that you live, the city or the neighborhood, the general region. Find some source of magic that is specific to that location that if your story were taken somewhere else, taking place someplace else, the magic would have to be different. Something endemic to where you live.
[Brandon] All right. So, thank you, audience at ComicCon.
[Whoo!]
[Brandon] Thank you, Greg van Eekhout.
[Greg] Thank you guys. This is fun.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses Season Three Episode 30: Unreliable Narrators

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2009/12/13/writing-excuses-season-3-episode-30-unreliable-narrators/

Key Points: Unreliable narrator, third person limited, depends on how wrong the character's perceptions are. Unreliable narrator, first-person, often just lies to the reader. Unreliable narrator can add a subtext, another layer of meaning that the reader deduces. Another use of unreliable narrator is to let us see the character's viewpoint more clearly, since we experience their flawed view of the world. Yet another use is as a plot device to hide a twist. Epistolary stories, told through letters and journals, often are unreliable because people hide things in their writing. You can also have epigraphs that are clearly mistaken. Using third person limited unreliable narrators who are competing can introduce tension and characterize because the reader sees both sides, even though the characters don't individually know enough. Some books have a character who misleads by paying attention to red herrings and discarding real clues as meaningless. Seeing the uncertainty -- experiencing the confusion of the unreliable narrator -- also builds sympathy. Just don't withhold too much, have good reasons for what you withhold and why.
behind the curtain... )
[Brandon] I'm going to go ahead and give our writing prompt this time. I would like you to do... to have one event occur, and then have five different perspectives of that event which are... none of which are completely true. Just people's own views of what happened. They did this once in the X-Files, it was a wonderful episode. [Note: probably X-Files Jose Chung's "From Outer Space"] The movie Hero accomplished this, different narratives explaining the same event.
[Howard] There's an episode of CSI that did the same thing.
[Dan] Rashomon by Kurosawa.
[Brandon] Give this a try yourself. This has been Writing Excuses, you're out of excuses, now go write.
[Howard] Five times.
[Dan] You're out of five excuses.

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789 101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 05:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios