mbarker: (Me typing?)
[personal profile] mbarker

Writing Excuses 21.08: Setting Expectations 


From https://writingexcuses.com/21-08-setting-expectations


Key Points: Expectations? What is the shape of the story? What are we going to do? Genre, plot structure. What kind of ride will this be? Beginning? First couple of scenes. By the end of the first chapter. Short stories? Small proportion. Microcosm in the first half page or whole page. How do people engage with their world? Hacking the brain and checking the label. Hit the markers to identify the kind of story. MICE quotient. Understanding the character's perspective. The feel, what is going on. Build reader trust. Make a promise and fulfill it. Let readers feel clever.  Let the reader figure it out just before you tell them. Raise a question and then answer it. Don't try to be mysterious. Sometimes the surprise can be how something happens. Control the tone, so the beginning matches the rest of the book. Use common human experiences. 


[Season 21, Episode 08]


[unknown] Every Lenovo is built to let. Them. Go. Let them work and rework. Let them animate. A dinosaur. No, a toaster. No, a hamster in a jetpack. Finally. Let them make it. This back to school season, join Lenovo's online education store for free at lenovo.com, where students unlock exclusive pricing, 10 times Lenovo reward points, and access to a thriving creator community. Lenovo.com. Let creatives create.. [singing Lenovo, Lenovo]


[Mary Robinette] This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons, and friends. If you would like to learn how to support this podcast, visit www.patreon.com/writingexcuses.


[Season 21, Episode 08]


[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses.

[DongWon] Setting expectations.

[Erin] Tools, not rules.

[Mary Robinette] For writers, by writers.

[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.

[DongWon] I'm DongWon.

[Erin] I'm Erin.


[Mary Robinette] And today we're going to talk about setting expectations. So, we have been looking at the things that you need at the beginning of the story. And, after taking a little break to go dive into my short story, we are back and we are talking about one of the specific things that you need to try to accomplish in the beginning, which is to set the expectations of a reader. So when we say expectations, like, what does that cover?

[DongWon] I mean, I think that covers everything from what is the shape of the story... I think that's the thing I say the most when talking about openings, is, this didn't communicate to me what the shape of the story is to come. What kind of things are we doing? Is this... And that includes genre, but that also includes sort of just like a hint of overall plot structure. And so those expectations for me are really like what kind of ride am I about to go on? I think of it as a roller coaster, and I look ahead and I can see, oh, there's a loop de loop, there's a drop, I don't know what that's going to feel like when I get there and there's stuff I can't see, but, like, okay, that's the kind of thing that says, versus one of those ones that just goes straight up and drops you right back down.

[Erin] I also have a couple of questions about that. Let's interrogate that.

[Chuckles]

[DongWon] I love roller coasters.


[Erin] No. I'm curious when you say beginning in this case, how large of a piece are you... Like, does it take for you to get that kind of... Is this a one-page thing, is this, like, a three chapter thing? How do they set that for you?

[DongWon] I think this is more of. like. a first couple scenes thing. So not necessarily first page. Like, first page is so much about setting a vibe and tone in a lot of ways as we were talking about in the last epi... Or a couple episodes ago. But I think in terms of setting expectations, I think really by the end of the first chapter, depending on how you've structured your book, I kind of need a sense of not necessarily who the protagonist is, but also, like, a feeling of, like, the kind of protagonist we're going to have. Right? So, if our opening is a cold opening with a character who's not going to recur, I think that's totally fine. But then the action of that should give me some indication of what kind of story I'm in. So I think of Six of Crows as a great example of this, which starts with the POV character who's... Spoiler... Is dead by the end of that prologue or first chapter or whatever it is. But I got the kind of sense... It introduced me to the magic system, to the setting, to the world, but also the like, oh, this is going to be a story of a certain kind of crime story, a certain kind of about resisting oppression, a certain kind of, like, violence will be present in this story. And I'm like, okay, I know what ride I'm on now, by the end of that. And so my expectations feel really thoroughly set by the end of that. And the rest of the book continues to deliver on that.


[Mary Robinette] So I'm going to answer that from short stories. Because I think it's the same thing, but I think one of the places that people get into trouble when they're going from novels to short stories, or the other way around, is that it is about proportions.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] So, the end of the first scene of a novel is like 1% of a novel-ish.

[Erin] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] And this is a really... Like, I've pulled that number out of my ass. But it's a really small proportion of that novel. And when you look at the first 1% of a short story, you're looking at the first half page, sometimes the first full page. Where you've got something that tells the reader the same thing, but you're just having to do it a lot more economically. So I think of it like if you're making a layer cake, and you decide to cut the recipe down to make some cupcakes. Right? It's the same proportions, you just aren't using as much flour for that cupcake as you do for the layer cake.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] So, for me, I'm thinking about the same things. Like... But I specifically try to get that microcosm in within the first half page, because I also know how editors read when they're reading slush. And that first half page is where they have to make the decision about whether to turn the page or move to the next manuscript.

[DongWon] I also think that's how readers read it, though. Right?

[Erin] Yeah.

[DongWon] I do think readers make their judgment. I think they're actually even meaner than industry folks are, because we... We're in it with, like, a hope of, like, that we want the story to be good, that we want to be excited about this. And so when we're reading slush, I do think there is a little bit more generosity afforded than sometimes a reader, who's like, I'm not paying for that. You know what I mean? That's my general impression from talking to readers, of like, oh, you guys are brutal.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah. I mean I certainly... When I've been in a brick-and-mortar store and pulling something off the shelf...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] To decide, sometimes it's like I decide within a paragraph whether or not I'm going to read it.


[Erin] Yeah. It's funny, I was thinking about, like, how do you set expectations, and thinking about like when I used to slush read, a lot of it was like how the characters... Like, not necessarily what they were doing, but, like, how they were moving through the story. If you think about a whole bunch of people confronted with, like, a clock... A clock table for whatever reason. Like, there are the people who would decide, like, how can I take this apart? What are its components? A technical approach for example. Where there are other people who would be like, this reminds me of time and what is the meaning of time? A more lyrical, poetic approach. And so that tells me as I'm moving through the story, okay, what can I expect in terms of the way that people engage with the world around them. It's almost like the way you think about people engaging with the way around them. If you think about the people you know, like, people carry their own stories with them, but if you have five friends and the same problem, they would all approach it a little bit differently and would probably give you a hint pretty early on as to how they would go through it.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah. And that's... I think that how they would go through it is a lot of it. If you've ever had an experience where you encounter someone... And it turns out that they were just having an off day, that's not the way they carry themselves for the rest of their life. But if you're reading the story, and it's like, this is the experience that you're going to have, but then the rest of the story is not like that... It can be... It can have this real disconnect.

[DongWon] Yeah.


[Mary Robinette] It's like that's not what I signed up for. I often talk about writing as a drug made out of words. Which is something that I got from, I think, Cory Doctorow, that writing is designed to hack the human brain. Because that is how he would phrase it. But... That with novels, what you're thinking about is a slow release, long acting drug. You're dealing with immersion, like, often a cocktail. And with short fiction, it's a fast-acting thing, it's designed for a very focused experience. You may go through different emotions while you're taking that to treat whatever symptom that you're trying to treat. But that you are picking it up for a reason. And that first page is kind of like checking the label to see is this going to address the symptoms I have?

[DongWon] Yeah. In terms of hacking the human brain, I think about it in terms of pattern recognition. Right? I... I talk about this a lot. Human brains are really wired for pattern recognition, it's like how our cognition works. And so storytelling is our way of communicating patterns that we've observed to other people and to Future Generations. Like, one of the things that makes humans special quote unquote is our ability to discover and communicate information and dangers across generational divides and communities. And so storytelling is kind of how we do that. Right? And so what you're trying to do in the opening is hack that process. You're trying to get me to match the patterns that exist in my brain of... So when I say the shape of the story, I want you just to like... I don't need you to tell me what's going to happen. I need you to hit certain markers that will activate my brain that goes, oh, I'm in a Law and Order episode, or, oh, I'm in a romance, or, oh, farm boy is going to find a sword in like three pages. You know what I mean?


[Mary Robinette] This is one of the places that I often reach for the MICE quotient. Because that means that in the beginning, I can have a small version of that problem happen. So if it's a milieu story, which is... it's about crossing thresholds and navigating, then I can begin with a little bit of a navigational problem at the beginning. If it's about a character story, I can begin with a little bit of angst. It's not the big angst yet. If it's an event story, something small goes wrong. It doesn't have to be the big thing. A lot of times when you're reading horror, there's just something that is out of place and unsettling. But it's not... like the haunted object has not yet hit the page. So often just saying, like, this is going to be a story about the status quo being disrupted, this is going to be a story about... Where we're going to have to be dealing with trying to be kinder to our self. Like, this is... These often help me make decisions about the kinds of information to give the reader in the beginning to set the expectations for what I want to have happen later on in the story.


[DongWon] I think it's really important that it comes down to perspective. Understanding the character's perspective, how they approach a problem, I think... One of my favorite openings is Lee Child, I be... Is it the first Jack Reacher novel? I think it's called The Killing Floor. And it starts with him getting arrested in a diner. And the main thing that strikes me in that is it's a very staccato opening, because you just feel Reacher tactically assessing everything in the diner. Of like, oh, this is, like, vulnerabilities, these are my entrances and exits, as these cops pull up and start coming towards the diner to arrest him. And you just... Moving through his perspective tells me everything I need to know about this character, everything I need to know about the story I'm about to get, which is going to be a very smart man dealing with very violent situations. And that is precisely what the book is going to deliver for the next however many pages, and it's a great thrill ride.


[Erin] I think sometimes it's about, like, the character, and sometimes it's about the feel, like maybe the milieu, the what is going on. I was thinking about Law and Order, because you mentioned it earlier. And in the, like, original Law and Order, openings are always two New Yorkers talking about something deeply New York-y.

[laughter]

[Erin] And so they stumble over a body.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] And I think that really sets, like, place is important, like, there's a New York atmosphere, especially to early season Law & Order that that captures. Like it doesn't start with the victim, it doesn't start with the body already there. It's them being like, oh, I can't believe I gotta be in this rent controlled apartment. Oh, no...

[DongWon] Fo'ged about it. Ah'm working here.

[Chuckles]

[Erin] Exactly. And I think it's like, okay, that gives you a sense of what you are getting from the story. And it's like if you liked this...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] You can get more of it. This is the expectation and we will fulfill it.

[Mary Robinette] Yes. It's the [garbled Brooklyn accents?]

[DongWon] Exactly.

[Mary Robinette] So we're going to take a quick break. And then when we come back, we're going to talk about some more tools for building reader trust.


[unknown] Lenovo gaming devices, like the Lenovo Legion 7I Gen 10 are engineered for victory. With powerful GPUs, ultra-responsive displays, and advanced cooling that stays chill under pressure. This back to school season, upgrade to a gaming PC that takes you from study mode to game mode in an instant. With exclusive student pricing, 10 times Lenovo reward points, and more through Lenovo's online education store. Join for free at lenovo.com. [singing Lenovo, Lenovo]


[Mary Robinette] Welcome back. And, as part of building our reader trust, I'm going to fulfill the promise that I made before our break and we are going to talk about how to do that. Because that's one of the important things that you're doing in the beginning, especially as a debut author, especially early career, or just... The honest thing is that if someone has never heard of you, even if you're five books in, you're a debut author to them. I had the joy of introducing someone to this author they had never heard of before, a little-known author called Ursula K. Le Guin...

[Chuckles]

[Mary Robinette] And so for them, Ursula was a debut author and had to build reader trust. So, like, wherever you are, you have to build reader trust. What are some of the tools that we can use to do that?

[DongWon] I think part of it is... You kind of mentioned this in a previous episode, but you make a promise and then you fulfill it. Right? You make some... You set some small expectation and then you pay it off. And that can be as little as like... I wanted to have a sandwich, oh, I have a sandwich. You know what I mean? And just like having... Just showing this thing in a very small way... And it's almost like animal training in a certain way, of, like, I'm going to set an expectation, I'm going to give you your treat. Proving that I'm a reliable source of treats. Now, I'm going to make a big promise, and you're going to get that treat by the end of this book.

[Erin] I think it's also, like, letting readers feel clever...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Is always a great way... Who doesn't like to feel clever? So in a book in which you start with a sandwich, even something as simple as having a character gather the ingredients for a sandwich, so a reader will be like, oh, they're making a sandwich, I can tell, like, they've got turkey there and lettuce and tomato. And then they're like, as I enjoyed the sandwich, just for one second you get to go, like, just like I knew they were going to do. Which makes you feel like I get the story. What I expected from what you gave. All the ingredients is what it was, and I'm smart. And everyone loves that.

[DongWon] Because that's part of the relationship, Trust, too. I'm trusting you to figure out that this is a sandwich one line before I say it's a sandwich. Right? And I think that's one thing that you should think about in reveals in general is let the reader figure it out right before you tell them. You know what I mean? Don't... If you're trying to completely surprise them, it feels bad. If you let them be like, um, this is a sandwich. Hah, I knew it was a sandwich. I think that is a really satisfying interaction, and builds that trust, because if the author is saying to the reader, hey, I know you're a smart reader and you know that I know how to build a reveal. I think once you start building that rapport, that relationship between creator and audience, that's going to create a really fun experience of reading this book.


[Mary Robinette] I think... Absolutely. I think with that, one of the other variations on that is specifically raising a question in their brain and then answering it.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] Which I wound up doing... It's one of the tools that I use in With Her Serpent Locks, because there was a thing that I was trying to do with that particular story. Which I... Like, the surprise that, ooh, look, we are actually dealing with Greek mythology. But, to start with, to get to the place where I could reveal that, I had to build reader trust. And I do it by saying, hey, cuz, as my starting line, and that raises the question, who's talking?

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] And then within the first paragraph, I'm like, her cousin wanted to visit, the asshole favorite grandson. So I immediately answer that question. And one of the things that I've found is that if you raise a question, and it's a small question, and you immediately provide the answer, you raise it and you provide the answer, and you raise it and you provide the answer, then you can raise a question and not provide the answer...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] And at that point, the reader is like, ah, I understand now. They are going to give me the information I need at the point that I need it, so I don't need it right now.

[DongWon] Yeah. Exactly.


[Mary Robinette] And that's when you can start playing. But what I see the failure mode of that is people raising up questions because they want to be mysterious. They want the reader to figure things out. But they aren't giving them the trust and... To know that they're going to get the tools to figure it out. And so it just makes the reader feel ungrounded and unsafe.

[DongWon] The thing I'm always telling... When I'm giving critiques on opening sections, I'm always like, just tell people stuff. Just tell people how your world works. You don't need to be mysterious about it. Just tell me, like, this is a mystery or this is what they're thinking about. Or let them solve problems early. And that lets you... Yeah. Have the big questions later. But I think there's such a feeling for... I see this a lot in TTRPGs, actually, too, of GM's being like, oh, I can't tell them this yet, because that has to be the big reveal. But sometimes I'm like, no, you can just be like, this is the big bad, this is the villain, he's bad. We're going to spend the rest of the time chasing this man. And that can be a really fun narrative thing. Right? Not everything has to be a surprise.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.


[Erin] And sometimes the surprise can be how it happens...

[DongWon] Exactly.

[Erin] Not that it happens.

[Mary Robinette] Yes.

[Erin] I mean, the entire Final Destination series is basically like, you goin' die. But how?

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] And where? And, like, in what horrible way?

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] And I think about that with one of the... I think the very first story I ever published was a story in which I wanted there to be this, like, big surprise at the end, and it just was not working for people. And so I made it, like, much easier to figure out, like, that this kid is the son of the other character in the story that he hates. And then, as you see him want to, like, hurt this person who is his father, then, like... It's bad. Because, like, you can see it coming, he doesn't get it, but you get it, and it's this feeling of, like, I cannot stop this, like, Greek tragedy from happening between the father and son, versus, like, surprise, that's his dad. Which is fine, but, like, just didn't have the same emotional weight. Because it kind of, like... we'll get to this with endings, but it's like, when you punch somebody in the stomach, you want to, like, wait a second to, like, watch that unfold before you run away. Like, if you punch someone and run away, you don't know if the punch hurt them. If you punch someone and stand there and watch them go ulp, then you know it landed. And then you run away.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[Erin] Before they can get you. And that's kind of what you want your story to do. But sometimes the surprise...

[DongWon] This is not tactical advice.

[Chuckles]

[DongWon] When you punch someone, you should just run away. Don't wait.

[Chuckles]

[Erin] In real life, don't do that.

[DongWon] Yeah. In real life, don't do that. Just to be clear.

[Erin] Comfortable. But...

[DongWon] Unless you got to. But, yeah.

[Erin] But, like... You punch people, you want to like... You're spending all this time, like, gearing up for the punch...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] That you're not even going to watch happen. And I think that can be... It feels like... It can never hold the force that you want it to. Because, like, everything cannot come down to this one surprise.


[Mary Robinette] And a lot of times, giving someone an answer at the beginning and they are like, oh, how is that going to happen? The opening line of The Calculating Stars is do you remember where you were when the meteor hit?

[DongWon] Ooh, that's good.

[Mary Robinette] And then what is that first chapter? The meteor hitting.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] So you have a piece of information that the protagonist does not have while she's experiencing that. And so you can... You understand contextually what is happening as she is piecing it together, and it's one of the ways that I built trust...

[DongWon] Yeah.


[Mary Robinette] With the readers for the rest of the story. It's like, yeah, I'm going to give you every piece, you're going to get to be a little bit smarter than her, sometimes. And those are things you can do. The other thing that I think you can do to build reader trust is control your tone. Because this is another place that... A failure mode that I'll see that someone will have is a total opening that's like... Like, really in media res action-packed thing, and then the rest of the story is this contemplative thing. That they've been told that they have to have something that's very hook-y...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] And interpreted hook-y to mean action...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] And fast. Or having a very slow opening that then is for a story that's super fast paced. So I think sometimes that's a place that you can play with.


[Erin] Yeah. I was thinking about those action openings. Because I do like them, and I think... I tried to figure out what makes them work. And a lot of times, it's... I think we can also hook into things that are common human experiences. A great way to kind of figure out... Like, if you have somebody who's nervous about giving a speech in public, that is something that a lot of people can relate to. It makes the character... Oh, that's a thing I got, and then, like, as they're on the way to give the speech, the spaceship explodes. But, like, while they're running through, they're like, oh, I'm sad the spaceship exploded, but I'm glad I don't have to give that speech. I'm like, I get that. That feels very... It feels really real to me, even though I don't know the character much yet. So, I find a lot of times action pieces work really well for me when there's something in them where the character has one driver...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] That is something that I understand as a driver that doesn't require me to understand the world. It's something that is very personal instead of like it is part of the World building.

[DongWon. Yeah. Giving a really simple relatable goal can be a way to carry somebody through an outlandish experience. But as part of why these action openings almost never work... They're really, really hard to do, actually. Because I don't care about this character yet, so I don't really care if they live or die or get hurt. I need to care about some aspect of it. I'm thinking of like the Harley Quinn movie where she has her breakfast sandwich. And the thing that matters is preserving this breakfast sandwich. And so... I mean, that's like a comedy beat way to do it, but giving a really small scale achievable goal to care about let you feel... Understand the character in a deep way, because the character cares about something, and then I can see how is she responding, how does she act? I learn who she is by her working through this scene of trying to save the sandwich, and failing.

[Mary Robinette] I think these are all really great ways to get people to trust you at the beginning. And, to continue building our reader trust with you, I think it is time for us to move to a little bit of homework.


[Mary Robinette] So, what I want you to do is I want you to review the first chapter of your work in progress. Make a list of all the story promises you've made. Keep this list somewhere you can easily refer back to as you progress through the story. So that you can make sure that you're staying on track. And if there's a promise that you set up, then maybe you should think about how you're going to fulfill it. But... Start with the list.


[Mary Robinette] And now, you're out of excuses. Now go write.


 
mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 17.9: Let's Talk About Structure
 
 
Key points: Beyond Freitag's Triangle, Save the Cat, Truby's 22 steps, and other overarching story frameworks, what are the specific techniques that fit into these narrative shapes? What is the writer's version of copying the masters? Sometimes you have a story, character, setting first, and then try to find a structure to fit. Other times, you have a structure or element of structure, and need to develop the other parts. Think about what is the important aspect of the story, and how can the structure enhance that. Look at what you are trying to do, and think about what structure can help bring that out.
 
[Season 17, Episode 9]
 
[Dan] This is Writing Excuses, our structured deep dive class, Episode One, Let's Talk About Structure.
[Mary Robinette] 15 minutes long.
[Peng] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.
[Peng] I'm Peng.
[Howard] And I'm Howard.
 
[Dan] We have a brand-new class starting, eight episodes, we're going to talk about structure. You've heard us talk about structure a lot, so we wanted to bring in Peng Shepherd to get her take on all of this incredible stuff. Peng, tell us about yourself.
[Peng] Well, first of all, thanks for having me. My name is Peng. I am a speculative fiction writer and the author of The Book of M, which came out in 2018, and The Cartographers, which is coming out in March.
[Dan] Well, excellent. Thank you very much. Now, we are starting today to talk about structure. This is your class and your outline. Where do you want to start in this structural discussion?
[Peng] Well, I think we should just talk about… We should just talk about structure in a kind of general way just to open this deep dive series. I also just want to say how important it is, I think. So what I really want to do with this series is go beyond the Freitag's Triangle, Save the Cat, Truby's 22 steps, these really big overarching story frameworks and look at structure much more closely as really specific techniques that can fit into these really big general narrative shapes that often get talked about. Because I think that structure at this level of detail gets overlooked a lot. We spend a lot of time as writers talking about plot and character and world building, but we don't often give structure the same level of attention. It's just something that sort of happens naturally to a lot of our stories. But I'd like to talk about ways that we can be a lot more intentional with structure as we write.
[Mary Robinette] One of the things that I was excited about when we were talking to you and bringing you in for this was exactly that, we tend to go back to the same things. So, two things that I wanted to say. One is that I asked Peng to come because I've been working with her for the past couple of years doing programming for the Nebula conference. When I was president, she was in charge of that with Erin Roberts and [K. M. Szpara]. So, it's really nice to have someone with this kind of breadth of knowledge of the industry. The other thing that I've been thinking about a lot recently, which is one of the reasons I was so excited about this topic, is the idea of structure in general. When we're talking about things like Freitag's triangles, Save the Cat, all of that, what we're really talking about is something in art that we call copying the masters, where you take an existing structure like what you used to do as an artist and sometimes still do is that you would take a painting and you would make an exact copy of that painting as a way to learn the techniques. Another related thing that you would do… Can do is you would take a painting and draw circles around the major elements. Then remove the original painting and put your own elements into the structures, into those circles, to kind of copy their compositional structure. I think that a lot of times what happens to us as writers is that we are constantly copying someone else's structure as a kind of reflex. It's like, "Oh. I've found Save the Cat." That works. It works every time. Except that it… The problem with that is that it gives you… The problem is something that can give you repeatable results is that you are always going to be repeating the same kind of story. So what I'm excited about with this is that we're going to be talking about a lot of different structures, which is going to really broaden the kind of story that you're going to be able to tell.
[Dan] Yeah. I… On my other podcasts that I do called Intentionally Blank, we did an episode about Encanto, the movie, which follows… Which ignores a lot of what we think of as kind of structural norms, because it is based on Latin American magic realism. Which does not follow a lot of the structures that we think of. It's been fascinating to have that conversation with a lot of people in the audience who, some people thought, "Oh, this didn't work. The ending didn't land. It's because they were expecting one thing and got another. Other people in the audience were very thrilled by seeing something that was so new and different that they hadn't seen before. A lot of that just comes from using different structural techniques. There is not one way. I do think, and I'm guilty of this myself, we often teach that the existing structure that we use is there because that's just how brains work. It isn't really. It's a cultural artifact. There are lots of different ways of doing it.
[Howard] Yeah. We talked about this at great length in the setting expectations class we did at the beginning of this year, end of last year. We talked about how when people recognize the beginning of a structure in a work that they're consuming, whether it's a movie or a book or whatever, you've set their expectations for that structure unfolding per formula through the rest of the work. If you're not seeing that structure, they will often be disappointed. It's which is what some people who saw Encanto experienced. That doesn't mean that it's wrong. It means that we haven't yet educated the audience to set expectations for a structure they've never seen before.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. A lot of structures exist for reasons that aren't… That are just kind of encoded. Like, the three act structure that we are all very familiar with, one of the things about that is when you listen to… When you really unpack what's happening with the three act structure, it's like, well, there's a beginning, and then there's a middle, and then there's an end. That's not actually all that useful when you really dig into it.
[Chuckles]
 
[Mary Robinette] I'm wondering if we should actually pause for a book of the week, since I think we are about at the middle right now.
[Dan] Yeah. I think that's a good idea.
[Mary Robinette] Speaking of structure.
[Dan] Let me take that one. I've got our book of the week this week, which is actually another magic realism novel called The Inheritance of Orquidea Divina by Zoraida Cordova. She's been on the show before, and she's a really wonderful author. This is the story of a magical family with Ecuadorian roots, but living in a place called Four Rivers in Oregon. The grandmother, the matriarch of the family, calls everyone together right at the beginning of the book to tell them that she is dying and they need to come and collect their inheritance. This being a magic realism novel, the inheritance is not money, it's several other things both good and bad that spin out over the course of the novel. It's told in multiple timelines, we get the modern stuff interspersed with the life of the grandmother as she grows up. The woman, Orquidea. It's a really wonderful book. I'm absolutely loving it and I recommend it very highly. It does have a very unique structure. It's not following a lot of the rules that we expect. It's very surprising and delightful to not see so many things coming. So, anyway, great book, check it out.
 
[Mary Robinette] So, I'm particularly interested in this whole topic, and I'm about to ask Peng a question. Because I am in the process right now of working on the outline for the Martian Contingency, which is book 4 in the Lady Astronaut series. The structure which I used for Relentless Moon was the seven act structure that… Seven point plot structure that Dan teaches. It will profoundly not work for what I want to do with the Martian Contingency. I've been like trying all of these different structural ideas to try to figure out exactly what the framework is that I'm hanging the thing I want to talk about, the thing I want to explore in the story. So, Peng, what are some… When we're thinking about structure, what are some of the implications that are there for us when we start looking at how to pick one of these, a different structure than maybe one that we're used to working with?
[Peng] Yeah. It's an interesting question. I think there's two ways to come at it. Because there are some writers who probably come up with a story or a character first, and then you have to figure out what kind of structure to use, which is what it sounds like is happening for you. The story and the characters are already really, really set. Then, on the other side, you could come up with… Or just have a structure or an element of structure that you really want your work to center around, but you don't have anything else yet. It's sort of like you come up with the character first or the premise first or the setting first? So, I think… I don't know which is harder. They're both hard. If you come up with the structure first or you come up with the characters first. But I think that if you've got the seed of a story, you've got the seed of the character, and you're trying to figure out what type of structure would be best for that, you first have to ask yourself, what is the most important aspect of your story that you're trying to explore? Is it the character or the relationships between characters, for example? Because then you might want to consider structures that focus on that, like multiple timelines or multiple perspectives. Or is the thing that you're trying to emphasize most the world or your world building or the setting? In which case, you might want to focus on a structure that is built around… And we're going to talk about all these in depth in future episodes. But you can focus on a story that's built around a specific thing in your world, or stories that have footnotes. Or, if the thing that you want to focus on the most is maybe like a twist, if your whole story is built around a twist, there are different structures that lend themselves really well to that kind of reveal, more than others.
[Dan] In a lot of ways, I feel like what we're saying is similar to the episode we did last year with Amal about poetic forms. That there's lots of different forms of poetry, whether it's a Shakespearean sonnet or a sestina or something like that, and the form you choose will help guide the poem itself and the impact that it has on the reader. We often think that there's only one structure and we have to use it. That's not the case. There's lots of different ones. Like Peng was just saying, the one you choose can help draw out elements of your world building or your characters or the twist you want to focus on or things like that. They can change the pacing and the tension. I think that's a really great point to make.
[Howard] One of the things that I… And I do it instinctively at first, and then I fall back on craft when I realize I'm doing it. If I've come up with a fascinating setting or a fascinating… A location or a thing or a technology or a plot twist or a character, I will begin structuring the story I want to tell around how our understanding of that thing unfolds. If it's a character who's undergoing transformation, then… Are there beats in that transformation? Well, those beats become structural landmarks around which the story paces itself. Are we exploring a location? Well, the geography becomes kind of a map to the structure. Once I realize that I've started doing that in my head, I take a couple of steps way back and say, "All right. Does this map onto an existing structure that I know how to use? Does this map onto seven points? Does this map onto kishotenketsu? Does this map onto… What does this map onto and how can I use it?" Usually I don't catch myself soon enough, so there's lots of slop.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. The… I was actually just thinking about kishotenketsu, which is the first time that I really… When we… I had talked about, oh, there are other things, like the rule of three is very Western, but other places it's the rule of five, the rule of nine. But until we did the episode with Dong Won Song, where we looked… Did a deep dive into Parasite, the film, and they were talking about kishotenketsu, I hadn't really thought about what… How that worked and why that film was so satisfying. So in that structure, you have… It's a four act structure. You have interaction, ki, development, sho, twist, ten, and conclusion, tetsu. It's… It is… It's really satisfying, and one that I'm… It's the one that I've been thinking about, contemplating, for Martian Contingency. But it is this thing where there are so many options out there that it's just exciting to be talking about this.
[Dan] Yeah. Well, I… Before we end, I want to point out that this doesn't have to be a massive sweeping thing. It could be something much simpler than we're making it sound. For example, Avatar The Last Airbender, the cartoon. It is split into three seasons, each of which follows one of the major nations that's involved. We get Water, and then Earth, and then Fire in season three. That, like Howard was saying, that's just the geography of the world and the world building influencing how the story is told. So, just thinking in those terms, you can come up with, well, why did they use three seasons? How did that fit their story? Well, it allowed them to explore each of the three extant nations. The Air doesn't get one because it doesn't exist anymore. So that's… At some level, that's what we're saying. Look at what you're trying to do and see what structure is going to help bring that out.
 
[Dan] Anyway, we've gone slightly over time. So let's throw this to Peng. What is our homework for this week?
[Peng] Your homework for this week is to pick a favorite book with an interesting or unusual structure and see if you can identify how the author's chosen structure enhances some aspect of the story, whether it's the tension or the plot or character development.
[Dan] That's wonderful. Thank you very much. We will be back next week with more talk and some specifics about structure. Between now and then, you are out of excuses. Now go write.
 
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 6.4: Microcasting

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2011/06/26/writing-excuses-6-4-microcasting/

Key Points:
1. Is is still safe to go the traditional publishing route? Yes. Take a look at both, though.
2. How do you balance serious with silly? It depends.
3. What are the alternatives to the 3 act structure? Writing a stupid book. Dan Wells' Seven Point Structure. MICE. Goal-based writing.
4. Do you ever lose your drive, and what re-inspires you? Yes. First, look at why it's happened, then figure out what to do to get out of it.
5. How does your writing life affect your non-writing life? Depends on where you draw the boundaries.
6. What was the defining moment in your life that said to you that you could be a writer? Selling a story to Cicada.
7. How effective do you feel video book trailers are? How do you measure effectiveness? Useful to send to people. Consider the cost -- $2000 and up.
more words... )
[Brandon] Anyway, let's do a writing prompt. Let's see. I'm actually going to grab one of these twitter questions and turn it into a writing prompt. So. Spencer Pager asks... Penger asks... "What are your thoughts on using traditional fantasy creatures in writing?" So, my question for you, my writing prompt is, you have to have a story in which people are using traditional fantasy creatures in writing. Meaning the actual physical creatures! Like you're grinding up unicorn horns and writing with...
[Howard] Hey, hey hey hey. Not that one. I actually do that.
[Brandon] Or you're using orcs blood or you're doing... Somehow, the fantasy creatures physically are necessary.
[Dan] Are involved in the writing.
[Brandon] In the writing process.
[Dan] This book is printed on the finest elf skin.
[Mary] Quill of the Phoenix... You have to write very quickly, and not burn your hands.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234 567
89101112 1314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 26th, 2026 05:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios