mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 18.24: "Dark One: Forgotten" Deep Dive
 
 
Key Points: Dark One: Forgotten by Dan Wells and Brandon Sanderson. A six-hour audiobook as if you were listening to a girl's amateur podcast. Prequel to the Dark One graphic novel and book (being written), and let's do it as a true crime podcast. Light on the explanations! Slow on the supernatural. Recording together or separately? Mix. Ad-libbing? Just the swear words that got bleeped out. 
 
[Season 18, Episode 24]
 
[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses.
[DongWon] Deep dive, Dark One: Forgotten by Dan Wells.
[Erin] 15 minutes long.
[Dan] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.
[DongWon] I'm DongWon.
[Erin] I'm Erin.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Howard] And I'm Howard.
 
[Dan] So, today, we are going to do our deep dive into a book that I wrote. We said by Dan Wells. This is cowritten with Brandon Sanderson as well.
[Howard] But he's not here to get his feet…
[Dan] But he's not here.
[Howard] Held to the fire.
[Chuckles]
[Dan] So, the way this is going to work, we're going to spend our 20 or 30 minutes today talking all about this in detail. How it was written and why and… Everything, everything. Then we're going to spend the next seven episodes kind of using that as a guide to talk about a lot of different principles that I find really important or interesting that this story helps to illustrate. So, we warned you a couple of times in the past. You need to go and listen to Dark One: Forgotten. So we hope you've done that. If you haven't in your sticking with us anyway, spoiler warning. This is a six-hour audiobook that is kind of disguised as if you were listening to some girl's college dorm amateur podcast where she is doing a true crime thing. So, that's Dark One: Forgotten. I love it dearly. I open it to the rest of you. What do you want to say or ask about this story?
[Mary Robinette] So, first of all, I am enjoying the heck out of it.
[Dan] Thank you.
[Mary Robinette] It… One of the things that I particularly enjoy is the fact that it is an audio drama. That there are… They are characters that are playing off of each other. So that's a lot of fun. I love that you're like… That the format is part of the story. My question is how much of that was decided when you and Brandon were sitting down at the beginning? Like…
[Dan] Yeah. So, that, interestingly enough, that specific aspect is the only bit of guidance that I had writing this. This is kind of sort of the prequel to a novel that we are still working on. There has been previously a graphic novel put out of the Dark One story. This is the story that sets that up. Basically, the two things Brandon said were A) this is a prequel to Dark One, and B) I think it would be cool to do it in this format, where you… As if it were a podcast. So… Then it was just me, making everything up beyond that point. Then he came back later during the revision process and there was more collaboration. But initially, that was the one guiding principle of the whole thing, is make this sound like some girl's true crime podcast.
[Mary Robinette] So, you know the ending that you're aiming for, and you know the format, and everything else is like Whee!
[Dan] Yeah. Pretty much.
[Chuckles] It was interesting because while I have written, for example, the Zero G series that we talked about on the show before, I wrote those as novels and then adapted them as scripts. And, crucially, they still have narrators. Where is this, because of the format, does not. So, basically, I just went back and re-listened to a couple of seasons of Serial, did some other things, did some homework. It took me… I want to say five months, maybe six months, to write that first episode. Because I had to get my head around what the format was going to sound like. Then, the second episode took me about a week. Because all… I knew what I was doing, it all made much more sense.
[Mary Robinette] I'm going to challenge you on the narrator aspect, though, because there is a narrator. She's just an embedded narrator.
[Dan] Yes.
[Mary Robinette] As opposed to a separate narrator.
[Dan] Yes. So, the main character, Christina Walsh, she does kind of narrate her story. I don't think of her as a narrator because she's not serving the function that the Zero G narrator serves. Which was to provide blocking and describe what things look like. It's not that kind of a narrator. It's more of a framing device to say, "All right. Now we're going to go talk to this person." Then the scene will change and it will all be in scene.
 
[DongWon] I think one thing that's interesting in hearing you talk about where this project comes from is you've kind of framed it as a prequel, but it's prequel to a thing that doesn't exist yet.
[Dan] Yes.
[DongWon] So you're sort of…
[Dan] This is true.
[DongWon] Writing in this extended universe, but that's not a universe that we had the opportunity to meet yet. So this is kind of our introduction. Was that a particular challenge, knowing that you had to hit a mark at the end of this and set up all this future plot and content and world, or was this more like a natural thing for you in terms of writing your own thing, and then it being able to build off of that and leaving hooks to build off of?
[Dan] Yes. It was much simpler than that. Because one thing that we wanted to do with this was kind of have is light of a touch as possible on to the larger story. So, basically, if you've read the graphic novel, anyone out there, it begins with a particular person in prison. This is basically the story of how that person ended up in prison. The… We're full spoilers, so we're just going to tell you. This is a… As Christina's doing her true crime podcast, she is interested in this one particular case of a missing person. She stumbles onto what turns out to be a serial killer. Which then further turns out to be a supernatural serial killer. That's what is going to set up Dark One for us. But it was important in this project, at least important for us, to not really explain any of that. To let Dark One be its own thing, and just tell as interesting a story as we could without worrying about the explanation. In fact, we pared a lot of it back during revision. Initially, we did explain much more fully what Mirandus is, for example, which is this word that keeps getting tossed around in the story. Then we decided, nope, that's what the later story can do. This one needs to focus more on Christina and who she is and her investigation and we can leave those answers for later.
[DongWon] Yeah. I really liked all the supernatural elements of the story… I mean, to me, as a reader who's read supernatural stuff quite a bit, I could tell that that's what was happening, but I did like how grounded the characters were in their perspective and in their time and setting. Always trying to figure out, like, is this a drug? Are there other explanations? That led me to a point where I was like, "Oh, wait. Maybe it's not. Maybe it actually is some kind of other scientific explanation that looks more magical in this way." So when it got to the actual supernatural part, I kind of really enjoyed how much wasn't explained. Right? There was all these things that I could fill in the gaps, but you had such a light touch with it that left so many more interesting questions and still kept me grounded in the action that was happening on the page, and the ark that this character was going through, without kind of, like, weighing that last act down with all this extra information. So I thought it was really nicely handled.
[Dan] That's good.
[DongWon] Not a question there, I'm just complimenting you.
[Dan] Well, thank you very much. That's what I'm hoping most of this episode will be.
[Chuckles]
[Dan] I'm glad that that worked, because that issue specifically was difficult enough that later in our series, we're going to do a whole episode on it. Which basically is when you see Dan Wells and Brandon Sanderson on the cover of something, you know that it's going to be supernatural or speculative in some way. So putting a really slow burn on that, where the characters don't know that they're in a supernatural story until episode three or four, five, when it really becomes obvious, was difficult. To get that balance right, how could we do that without making the reader feel frustrated. Like, oh, these idiots are clearly in a story with magic. Why won't they just admit it?
 
[Erin] A question that I had is that you talked about this wanting to get this feeling of the kind of crime podcast out of the dorm room. As we start introducing, like, characters and, like, the interview this person, they interview that person, how much of that was driven by the story you were trying to tell, and how much of that was driven by trying to be really fidelity to the format that you were trying to replicate?
[Dan] It's a mix of both. One thing that you'll notice as you listen to it, is the first episode is much more in the style of Serial. Right? It is here's my investigation, here's me interviewing this specific person, and then we keep cutting back to that framing story of she's in her dorm room recording this. Then, once we get to episode two, they leave the dorm room, they go out into the world, and it becomes a much more overt adventure. By the time we get to episode five, the gloves are off completely, and she's just kind of recording her life is desperate things happen to her.
[DongWon] It does seem to go from Serial into The Blair Witch Project at some point.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] It becomes a found footage and found audio kind of thing, especially once no one can remember her anymore, and this is her only lifeline into the world. It really does have that feeling of like, "Oh, yeah. They went into the woods, and nobody knows what happened to them." Right?
[Chuckles]
[DongWon] It's like Out Of the Woods's ending.
[Howard] There's a nice verisimilitude to that. When we watch the early Marvel movies, and someone has a superpower, people very quickly twig to the fact that, oh, this is a superpower. When you look at… When you listen to this, it takes a long time for anybody to accept that there is not a rational, scientific explanation for what's going on. Which is how the real world, I feel, would work.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[Howard] It'd take me… I mean, I love magical science fiction whatever. It'd take me a really, really long time to believe that, for instance, Florida man gnawing on somebody under an overpass is an actual zombie and not just a one-off bad drug reaction. It'd take me a long time to come around to that. I like the way these characters were the same way.
[DongWon] Well, the way you kept hanging a lantern on it, with the Sherlock Holmes thing, with the Occam's razor thing, of like here's the simplest answer, and it's like… I, as the audience, am like, "No, there's a simpler answer. There's magic." Then I'm like, "That's not a simpler answer."
[Chuckles]
[DongWon] "That's… It's fundamentally insane. [Garbled]
[Mary Robinette] The whole impossible aspect of it. But one of the things that I really liked that you did, on the Into the Woods thing, is setting up the in-story mechanic of as a protection for ourselves, we are setting these up to immediately upload if we are… If there are problems. Which I think does two things. One, it forecasts it's gonna get bad. Two, it does give you that transition to the immediacy of the found footage as you go. Which I was just, very clever. Well done.
[Dan] Thank you very much. If… One of the very few regrets that I have about this is that I wish that the sound design had followed more of my scripts.
[Chuckles]
[Dan] There are absolutely cases where you can tell, oh, they're outside now, or, oh, they're in a coffee shop right now. But not all of those got translated across. So, while I do think they did a phenomenal job and the acting in particular is stellar, there's a couple of places where I wish some of that found audio sense was stronger, where a scene break is more obviously, oh, they are now in a different location. This should sound like an office.
[Howard] I have some questions about how you document that, how you make those notes. But I don't think I get to ask them until after our break.
 
[Erin] All right. Thing of the week is Zombies Run which is a game that you can play or listen to, experience I will say, on Android and iOS. It is a thing where you are somebody living in the zombie apocalypse, and you are being forced to run from place to place while conversations are happening in your ear and people are asking you to fetch things and do things. What it is sort of outside of the world of playing it is this brilliant way to kind of make fitness and gaming and audio work together in a really fun way. I've written some of the scripts for this in later seasons, and you're just running from place to place as really intricate stories happen around you. It helps you to think, wow, running is fun, and not, ugh, my knees.
[Mary Robinette] I'm going to tagteam in on this.
[Giggles]
[Mary Robinette] Because I love Zombies Run so much. It's the only thing that has ever gotten me to run. When I developed tendinitis in my hips, I was mad, because I was like, "But I need the rest of the seasons." So I've been thinking about doing Zombies Housecleaning.
[Laughter]
[Erin] I will say one random thing about this, which is when we were in sort of peak Covid period, we actually had a zombie invasion come into the town so that nobody could leave.
[DongWon] Oh, that's great.
[Erin] People started doing zombie, , like, housework and, like, how could you work out in your house.
[Laughter]
[Erin] To try to adapt the format to what was going on.
[That's so smart]
[Erin] So we are here for you, and for all of you, so listen and enjoy.
 
[Howard] Audio cues. Dan, audio cues. How do you notate those in your script? How do you keep track of that? Because, I mean, I have a hard time as a cartoonist who writes prose sometimes, I have a hard time remembering to describe the room, because I know I come from, "Oh, I'm just going to draw pictures for this." How do you notate it, how do you keep track of it, how does it go on your… How do you even…
[Dan] Yeah. Well. It's weird. This is why it took me five or six months to write that first episode. First of all, while I have written scripts for TV and for some other things, I really was kind of making this up as I went. So the first thing to tell people is don't necessarily expect the way I do this to be the way everyone does this. In particular, I did not use, for example, Final Draft to write this audio script, which is kind of the standard software if you are writing for Hollywood, but is not something that audiobook people necessarily know what to do with. So I did it all in Word. What I did is really tried to get myself into the mindset of that kind of found audio that I did. That everything we hear is something Christina recorded on her phone. Then, in lieu of narrative descriptions of what a room looked like, I would start each scene with a little bracketed paragraph, maybe just a couple of sentences saying, "Okay, they're in a coffee shop now. The audio needs to change, we need to hear in the background people murmuring or plates clinking, maybe somebody occasionally shouting Order up." Something like that. So that it sounds like they're in a diner or a café. When the phone gets dropped or manipulated because they pick it up, I would mark that. If somebody is shouting at them from farther away, I would say, "Distantly we hear…" And then the dialogue. So just kind of… That was my way of doing those audio cues. In brackets. To just let the audio engineer that assembles all of this no this needs to sound like it's coming over a phone. This needs to sound like it's being shouted across a park. This needs to sound like it's being recorded in a closet.
 
[DongWon] So, I mostly work on prose fiction, on books. The thing about writing a book is you can do whatever you want in it and it doesn't increase the marginal cost of the next page. Right? Every page cost the same, no matter what's on it. Now one of the things we run into in terms of getting a story adapted for TV or film is how expensive is it going to be to film this. So, was that a thing that was kind of in your mind as you were doing this, knowing you are going to have this full cast video? Was there a limitation for you, and somewhere was there a brake on, oh, if I put them in a new location, we're going to have to come up with a new Foley for that, we're going to have to cast another person to play this waitress in this coffee shop or this… There'll be interjections from other people, being like, hey, could you keep it down? Did you feel like, oh, I can't do that too many times, because that increases the cost by this much or was it more free-form, solve it, and once it's in production…
[Dan] Yeah. For me, some of that TV writer training came out. There were absolutely cases where I'm like, "This would be a very natural spot for a waitress to come and ask a question. But then we have to hire a waitress, so I'm not going to do that." I wasn't concerned very much with Foley or with sound design. What I did find myself doing was making sure the conversations themselves were long and interesting. So that in a given hour long episode… I call them six episodes. It's a six-hour book that's kind of split into parts. Initially, we thought we might be releasing them one episode at a time. But… So in a given hour, there will only be maybe five or six scenes. They take a long time and we get to really dig into it and have a long conversation. This served a couple of different purposes. It kept costs down in that we only had to hire five extras for that episode to do the interviews instead of like 20. It also meant that we could really dig into some of these questions. One of my very favorite conversations in the entire series is in episode two, where they go to a cult expert.
[Mary Robinette] Oh, I love that one.
[Dan] They're thinking that it might be somehow involved with a cult that is trying to cover this up. First of all, the actor they got for that was so great.
[Chuckles]
[Dan] His mannerisms and the way he speaks… Some of that was written in, and a lot of it was just the actor really bringing his all to it. But that's like a 15 minutes scene. It's huge. Because it was so long, that gave them the chance to just really probe every corner of this question. Is it a cult? Maybe because of this. Probably not because of this. Let me explain all of these other things which, for me, is fascinating, to just let interesting people talk to each other. Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] That was one of the most Dan Wells-ian scenes.
[Laughter]
[Mary Robinette] Because I'm like, "Um. Here we are. Dan is just going to bring out everything that he knows about death cults and cults."
[Dan] Yeah. Here's my quirk.
[Mary Robinette] Like, you didn't have to look up up any of these, did you?
[Dan] Here's the part where the expert just sits and talks about what they're an expert in.
 
[Mary Robinette] So, I'm actually curious about a process thing. When you are doing these, when they were recording them, was the cast recording together or were they recording separate?
[Dan] Much of them were done separately. There were places where they would bring definitely Christina and Sofia in to try to record together as much as possible. The two leads. Then, on occasion, I think the cult expert and maybe the drug scientist and maybe one or two others, they brought them in and had all three people in the room at the same time to try to get as much of a conversational feel to it. I mention those two instances in particular because I know there's a lot of talking over each other, there's a lot of interrupting each other. Something like, for example, in episode… I want to say four, there's a conversation with a pharmacist. That one I think they just recorded her separately, because it didn't involve as much back and forth. So it was easier to… For them, to just do it by themselves. But, yeah, I was really happy that for some of those scenes they got everyone together and just let them play it out.
[Mary Robinette] Did you get to be there for those?
[Dan] I was invited to be there for those and was not able to fit it into my schedule.
[Mary Robinette] Do you know if they got to do ad libbing?
[Dan] There are a couple of places where I know that some ad libbing happened. In particular, like I said, that cult guy, he added a little bit to it. But overall it is surprisingly faithful to the script that I wrote. Sophie did more ad-libbing than anybody else.
[Mary Robinette] That fits.
[Dan] Which fits her character. She's very much the kind of firebrand kind of character. I got to hear the unedited audio for several of these, and Sophie is the one who got bleeped all the time.
[Chuckles]
[Dan] I do not swear much, and I don't typically include a lot of swearing… A lot of English language swearing in my books. I put tons of Spanish swearwords. This was an opportunity for me, knowing that it would be audio and that Christina is the kind of person who would bleep it out, to just give Sophie the worst mouth…
[Chuckles]
[Dan] And she swears a blue streak, and then it just bleeps out. I got to hear the unedited, and she just went off. Because the script had said, "What the [bleep]" That kind of stuff. Sophie just improvised all of that.
[Chuckles]
 
[DongWon] Delightful. I have sort of a format question again. We've seen this explosion in fiction podcasts over the last several years. Right? Whether it's a [culmination] or whatever it is, there have been all these… Serialized storytelling has come back in this big way with full cast production, often with like big stars. You guys recorded a six episode podcast and released it as an audiobook. What went into the decision to do it as a single audiobook, as opposed to trying to do it as an actual podcast?
[Dan] I wish that I had a good answer for you.
[DongWon] Okay.
[Dan] That was a decision that I was not privy to. We didn't really know exactly what format this was going to be in until it came out, really. There was… Right towards the end of the process, there were some factors that made communication difficult between us and the people producing it. So, I like the decision they landed on. I think it makes it easier. We don't have to worry about a tail of people who listened to three and then forgot to listen to the third one… Err, the fourth one, and then it all falls apart. So I think that they probably made the right decision, although part of me does wish that we had released them one week at a time. Just because that's how they were written, and I like the idea that you're following this story as she's recording. Because she… Kind of the conceit in the story is that she finishes recording everything. She edits it together, and uploads it on the spot. Then, most of the episodes begin with her saying, "Well, lots of comments on the thing from last week." Which I thought would have been a fun little bit of interactivity. But…
[DongWon] Well, you get the variations of intros that change a little bit over time and that element, too. So… Yeah. It was really well done where it felt very cohesive as a single audiobook. But the conceit of it was also a real delight, in terms of hearing the audiovisual episodes within the greater whole as well.
 
[Howard] The question everyone wants to ask right now, the hot question on everyone's mind, is how much has 15 years of experience as a podcaster for Writing Excuses…
[Laughter]
[Howard] Helped you write this book as well as you did?
[Mary Robinette] Yeah, that was exactly the question that was burning in my mind.
[Dan] Exactly the thing that everybody wanted to know. I don't know. I don't have an answer to that. Sorry. It just made me brilliant. That's what it did.
[Chuckles]
[Mary Robinette] There you go.
[Dan] Yeah. I can promise to all listeners that it will make you brilliant as well. One thing I do want to talk about and make sure that we hit this point before we end is, like I said, this was a collaboration with Brandon Sanderson. He had the initial idea of let's do this as a kind of fake podcast. Then I wrote the entire thing and sent it back to him. He made one suggestion that, in hindsight, I can't imagine the story without it. It's embarrassing to me that I didn't think of this. One thing I made sure to include…
[Mary Robinette] Wait. You're not going to tell us?
[Dan] I am going to tell you. One thing I made sure to include in episode four, because it deals with memory. What's really going on is that the serial killer is impossible to remember. That effect kind of rubs off on to his victims. People forget them as soon as he takes them. That made it very difficult for a long time before anyone to even notice this was happening, let alone do anything about it. So I loved the idea, and you see this pop up in episode four, that she realizes she's already researched this. She has an external hard drive that she's carrying with her that has hundreds of hours of audio she's already researched and forgotten about. I thought, "Oh, that'll be really creepy, and that'll be really cool." Brandon said, "Yes, but what if something happens and she gets forgotten?" That's what happens at the end of episode four, which, again, in hindsight, how could I have done this without that?
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[Dan] She spends episode five and six basically also impossible to remember. Sophie forgets who she is, everyone forgets who she is, and she's kind of suddenly on her own, really at the mercy of this weird supernatural effect in the world and all of this stuff. It was a really vital part of that collaborative process to come up with that and then figure out how to make it work.
[Howard] From the listener standpoint, the discovery that she'd already been researching this gave me chills. The plot twist, the disaster of suddenly being forgotten, was that moment where… As a writer, I'm always doing the why did the meta not explained to me that this was coming? Why did I not see this from the meta? It was that moment where I was like, "Of course, that's what has to happen. That's the only possible disaster that we could have that would fit the tone of this book." So I see why you're so frustrated with yourself…
[Dan] Yeah.
[Laughter]
[Howard] That Brandon had to think of it for you.
[Dan] Frigging Brandon no. It was really good. But, yeah, in hindsight, it is inevitable that that would have to happen. That is the kind of third act twist, all is lost, oh, no, no one can remember me, I'd lost my entire support structure. Everything we built up so far has fallen apart. Which gave me the chance to really dig into the concept of memory. This is something you, if you've read a lot of my other books, I get into this a lot. There's three books in a row in the John Cleaver series that are really dealing with this. I love that idea of what is memory and how does it work and how do we interact with it. It's kind of a bit of a hobby horse of mine. So it was fun to see that from the inside.
 
[Dan] All right. We are going to be done with this episode. We are going to use this as a spine, is guideposts for the next seven. We'll be going to a lot of different topics. But right now, we're going to end with some homework.
[Mary Robinette] The homework assignment that I have for you is that I want you to think about something that you remember that no one else does. Then I want you to come up with a supernatural reason that that happened.
[Mary Robinette] In the next episode of Writing Excuses, we learn how I started writing prose, and how you can immerse readers in your world with clocks. Until then, you're out of excuses. Now go write.
 
mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 13.30: Project in Depth, THE CALCULATING STARS, with Kjell Lindgren.
 
 
Key points: (Beware of Spoilers) The Calculating Stars. Set During Mercury/Apollo era space travel. Start with We Interrupt This Broadcast, an alternate history about slamming a meteor into Chesapeake Bay in the 1950s. Add Lady Astronaut of Mars, an anthology piece that starts with the first line of Wizard of Oz. Then drop back to write the prequel, 40 years before! And you have The Calculating Stars. Decide that the loving relationship, the commitment, is not going to be a conflict point, although stuff going on around them can strain the relationship. Going up there and doing cool astronaut things is actually a very small part of the adventure for the whole team and the family. Put the focus on emotional reactions and societal pressures more than technical pressures. Survival training. Terminology. The emotional reactions to events, the visceral reactions. The vividness of your first launch. Get experts to fill in the jargon.  
 
What did they say? )
[Brandon] This is Writing Excuses, Project in Depth, The Calculating Stars.
[Mary] 15 minutes long.
[Dan] Because you're in a hurry.
[Brandon] And we're not that smart. I'm Brandon.
[Mary] I'm Mary.
[Dan] I'm wondering what evil plague you have in your lungs…
[Laughter]
[Dan] Over there, Brandon.
[Brandon] I don't know how many of these have aired yet, but I haven't been on the NASA episodes yet. You can tell why. I've been on book tour for a week and also caught a head cold.
[Dan] He was sick, so we had to quarantine him from the mission so the rest of us could carry it out.
[Brandon] But I'm stepping in for this one because we're going to talk about Mary's book and we have a special guest star, Kjell Lindgren. Say hi to the audience.
[Kjell] Hello, audience. I'm excited to be here.
[Dan] Welcome back.
[Kjell] Thank you.
 
[Mary] So I am especially excited about this specific Project in Depth, because it has two unique circumstances for you listeners. So, first of all, this is a reminder that in the Project in Depth's, we go full on spoilers. The Calculating Stars is not a heavy book to be spoiled, but if you're one of those people don't want to know anything ahead of time, read the book first, come back and listen. But the reason I'm excited about it is that we are doing this at an interesting point in the process. I have not yet finished… My editor has done all of the structural stuff on it, but we haven't done the line edits, which means that I'm actually going to be able to incorporate any changes that come up during this conversation.
[Ooo]
[Mary] And because this book is set during Mercury and Apollo era space, and it's involving my Lady Astronaut universe, and we have an actual astronaut here, this is also an opportunity for you to kind of hear sort of what it's like to have a sensitivity reader or a specific expert in to talk about a book. This is kind of what this process is like, although obviously usually it's not done in a podcast format.
[Laughter]
 
[Brandon] So, let's address, at least for me, what the elephant in the room is for this. This is a stor… A novel based on a novella that you wrote. Why did you decide to do it? How did you approach it? Like, just that concept? What's going on here?
[Mary] Okay. So what started with this… For most people. Most people first became aware of this through the Lady Astronaut of Mars. Which is not actually the first book in this series… In this universe that I wrote. I call this my punchcard punk universe. The first story I wrote in this was from a writing prompt. It's called We Interrupt This Broadcast. It was about slamming a meteor into the Chesapeake Bay in the 1950s. That one was… That idea I had was it would be really cool if there was a mad scientist and things went slightly wrong because he had forgotten to account for leap year. That was how that started. Then, Lady Astronaut began when I was asked to write something for an anthology called Ripoff in which we had to begin our story with a famous first line. So I began with the first line of Wizard of Oz, which is why I have the International Aerospace Coalition launching rockets from Kansas…
[Laughter]
[Mary] Because I got locked into that.
[Brandon] Did that ever feel like… I don't know…
[Mary] A giant mistake?
[Laughter]
[Brandon] [inaudible restriction?]
[Mary] Yes. Because it doesn't make any sense at all to launch rockets from Kansas. You want to be as close to the equator as you can be. It's nice to have a big body of water in case something goes wrong. I've got none of that in Kansas. So what happened with the novel is that it's set 40 years before the novella with the same character… Same main character. So there was a lot of stuff that I had to justify in the world that I was locked into. There's also stuff that I just… I looked at and like, "Oh, boy, that timeline was wrong." So Elma in Lady Astronaut of Mars just misremembered the dates on that. 'Cause…
[Chuckles]
[Mary] It doesn't make any sense.
[Brandon] Locked into some character things, right? You've got the relationship which... we know what happens in 40 years. So we know that they're going to be in a loving relationship for another 40 years and things like this. Like, there are certain things... Did that ma… Was this the sort of restrictions breed creativity sort of thing or was this a man, I wish I could just toss this continuity?
[Mary] There were times when I… Mostly timeline issues with continuity. The timeline does not actually make sense. But we just, as I say, handwaved past that. The character stuff, there were things about it… I was committed to having a loving relationship. That's… I liked…
[Brandon] That's one of my favorite parts about the book.
[Mary] Thank you. I feel like it's not depicted often enough. So I… One of the things that I knew going into it was that their commitment to each other was never going to be a conflict point. But that all of the stuff that was going on around them would cause stress… Would put strain on the relationship, but not in the OMG, are they going to break up? I never wanted that to be a plot point.
 
[Dan] So, before we get too far into this, I feel like we may have missed a link in this chain earlier. Where was the point where you decided, "Okay, I've written these two shorts. Now I'm going to go back and write a novel." How was that decision made?
[Mary] I don't actually remember completely.
[Laughter]
[Mary] I suspect that it was something along the lines of, "Hey. That just won a Hugo award."
[Laughter]
[Mary] "Can I market that?"
[Dan] Let's capitalize on this thing.
[Mary] Which is really crass. But it was… To a certain degree, it was looking at some of my favorite works. Like Anne McCaffrey's Dragonrider… The Ship Who Sang, which was a short story that got expanded and some other things.
[Brandon] Even Dragonflight won the Hugo before it was finished as a novel.
[Mary] Yeah. So I was interested in what that process was like. The other thing was that I have these characters and they've got this really interesting backstory that I haven't explored. Like, I talk about in the novella that Elma was one of the first women… The first people on Mars. How does that come about in the 1950s? How do you get to a point where you have women in space since it took a long time in the real world for that to happen? So how do I make it happen faster? So there was a lot of it that there were just pieces of it that I was interested in, but I don't actually remember what it was that made me go, "This is a good idea."
[Chuckles]
 
[Brandon] So, let's get the astronaut, first thing.
[Laughter]
[Mary] Thank you. Because I've been looking at Kjell. I'm like, so… Yes. Tell… So…
[Kjell] I'm coming at this from a completely blank slate. So, not having read the sequel that was first written, I get to kind of follow this chronologically from when Elma first becomes an astronaut. So… I have to say that the relationship between Elma and Nathaniel is one that… There's clearly a very loving relationship, and frankly, Nathaniel sets a very high bar…
[Laughter]
[Kjell] For husbands everywhere. But it's clear there that that is kind of the emotional core from which Elma draws her strength. I think that that really resonates for those of us that undertake these sometimes… Well, not sometimes. These very risky missions. That we, I think, largely recognize that we could not do this, we could not go through selection and go through training and do all that travel and do the mission as a single entity. It requires support at home from the family. Your spouse has to be on board with this. Your kids have to be on board and understand what all this entails. So, for me, personally, and I see that in Elma also, is that it is an adventure for the team, for the family. The other part of it is that you clearly are showing behind the scenes, that it's not just the astronaut that is going up there and getting to do…
[Mary] Really cool astronauty things.
[Kjell] Yeah, cool astronaut things. In fact, that is a very, very small part of…
[Brandon] Well, that's the book, right?
[Kjell] That's real life.
[Brandon] [inaudible]
[Kjell] That's true, that's true. I mean… So, that is real, also. In a typical astronaut career of… I don't know if you can call 20 years typical, that's maybe six months, maybe a year in space. So most of that time is spent on the ground, with this larger team that makes that possible. That is reflected in these… You know, the calculators that are doing the work and mission control and the engineers and all that. So that is, I thought, really well depicted and reflected in the book.
[Mary] Whew!
[Brandon] I'm going to build off this and ask you a question, because this is one of the most interesting things about this book to me. When you first started talking about it, I remember brainstorming with you. What is now two books was one book. A lot of the things you talked about were going to be… All ended up in the second book, right? The quote unquote exciting parts. Right? The actual flying, the rocketship, and [inaudible]
[Mary] Right!
[Brandon] Yet, this book is very compelling. You made an extremely compelling book out of quote unquote the boring parts. It's not boring at all. In fact, it feels breakneck to me throughout the entire story. So, how did you structure this, knowing that what everyone expected to be the book wasn't going to come until the second book, and how did you keep it paced and exciting?
[Mary] So, this was… when we were talking about it was… My plan was that I was going to structure it like three novellas. That novella one was dealing with the asteroid strike, novella two was the push to the moon, and novella three was the push to Mars. As I got into it and started… Was working on it, there were sections that… Because I knew I was going to be doing them in novella three with the Mars, that I was needing to skip in novella two, the push to the moon, because they felt… It felt… It was going to be repetitive. But it also meant skipping things that were really emotionally important. So I talked with my editor and said I feel like I have made a structural mistake and that this is actually two different books. As soon as we did that, and moved Mars to being its own book, that freed me up to deal with a lot of the unsexy stuff. But the things about… That I had been reading about in all of these different autobiographies by astronauts, talking about the selection process and getting the call and the first time that you do… The first training flights that you do and all of these different things that are these emotional points. So what I was trying to work with was… With this was not so much the question of… It's never a question of is she going to the moon? Is she going into space? That's never… But how and when and what is she going to have to push against? So what I wound up doing was trying to focus more on her emotional reactions to stuff, and also the societal pressures, rather than the technical pressures. The technical pressures, I felt like, well, this is our job, this is what we're doing, this is the thing we do. Then, the societal pressures were kind of more my major plot points. Because it's set in the 1950s, which is in the middle of the civil rights era.
 
[Dan] So, one of those kind of emotional arcs that you do in this book is her overcoming this kind of very intense anxiety disorder that she has. I am wondering how much of that was presaged by the previous books, or is that just you felt like it was important for her character and you created it for this one?
[Mary] It was something that I created for this. By 40 years later, she's got that pretty much under control. In part, because the specific anxiety that she has is a social anxiety disorder. You have things… You strap her on a rocket, she's fine. But you ask her to speak to a large room, she's like, "I'm not okay with that." That is true for a lot of people. Also, oddly, people with things like social anxiety disorder tend to be really good in a crisis situation because they're used to managing low level… Or high-level anxiety all the time. So they're actually quite levelheaded when things are going wrong. I added that because I had a character who was hyper competent. That was this canon thing. She's a pilot, she's this computer… Mathematician. I needed to give her a breaking point, a weakness. That one was a very obvious one for a number of reasons. One of which is that it also allowed me to highlight some of, again, those societal pressures. Because she's bucking against what it is that she's supposed to be doing, the hole that people keep trying to fit her in. So that was one of the reasons I added that to her character.
[Brandon] Oh, go ahead.
[Kjell] I have to say that that societal part was something that it was hard to read. The reactions to… The introduction of the female astronauts, and photos of them powdering their nose in the cockpit, or as they're doing a dunker test, putting them in bikinis. So from today's perspective, I have a really hard time with that. But when I think back to the 50s, and you've just introduced a new astronaut class and you ask this group about cooking in space and this cook about what they're going to accomplish during a mission. I mean, of course, that is very foreign to the experience… I hope is very foreign to our experience now, but it really brings you into the era that we're talking about.
[Mary] It was… That was based on two things, which are both unfortunately real world. One is the way the WASPs were treated in World War II, and a lot of the early women airline pilots… Just even becoming airline pilots. But there was… One of the things that they would have to do… I read about… I think this is in Jerry Cobb's book… But in one of the books about early women pilots, they would talk about how they would fly, and they would own their own company, or they would be… The captain. They would get in the craft, they would fly it to wherever they were going, and then they would have to slide their trousers off and slide a skirt on before they got out, because the people wanted to see them in skirts and heels. That they would have to powder their nose in the craft and put on the lipstick before they got out because that's what the client expected to see. Some of the first women astronauts talked about the different questions that they got from the press. You can read them and you're like, "Yup." I mean, I've pushed it a little, but not very far.
 
[Brandon] Let's stop for the book of the week. You were going to tell us about Riding Rockets?
[Mary] Yes. So this is one of the books that Eileen known very heavily when I was writing this. There were a number of them which we've talked about on other podcasts. But Riding The Rocket… Riding Rockets by Mike Mullane, who is a shuttle era astronaut. It is a fantastic autobiography. One of the things that's great about it is that he came into the program when a lot of the Mercury and Apollo people were still there. So he's got this perspective, where he's looking at the way the program is changing, and also he's a really compelling storyteller and very good with sensory details. I pulled a lot of stuff from that.
[Kjell] I really enjoyed that book as well. It's a great shuttle era book.
 
[Brandon] Let me ask you, Kjell, did you get freezing water squirted in your ear?
[Kjell] I did not get freezing water squirted in my ear. I spent three days and two nights in a freezing Russian forest. But I did not get surprised with a…
[Mary] Yeah. That was… I so wanted… That was one of the things that I wanted to fit into the book and just there wasn't a structural spot for it, was the wilderness survival stuff.
[Kjell] You bet.
[Chuckles]
[Mary] Ah, I wanted that in there. So I'm going to do…
[Brandon] What do you mean by that? Like, you actually… They make you do wilderness survival?
[Kjell] Absolutely. So they did it back in the Apollo days. In fact, there's a great photo of… Actually, I think it's the Mercury 7 out in a desert. They've cut up a parachute and tied it on their heads, they're in various states of undress, because they're out doing essentially desert survival.
[Mary] They weren't sure where they were going to come down.
[Kjell] Right.
[Brandon] Okay.
[Kjell] So, as a part of our training, we do water survival and winter survival to prepare us for the possibility of one, landing in water. The Soyuz spacecraft is designed to land on land. So a water landing requires some additional procedures and training. Then winter survival, because… I did in fact at the end of my mission land in the middle of the night in a blizzard. So had the team not been able to track us, then we would have to have been able to fend for ourselves for a little while. That technology's improved since the days that we really kind of started this training. We have GPS, we have satellite phones. So the fact that we would… The team wouldn't be able to find us is fairly remote at this point. But the winter survival training is a little bit of a… A little bit of a haze.
[Chuckles]
[Kjell] Just to kind… It's that Type II fun that I think in a previous podcast…
[Laughter]
[Kjell] That Tom Washburn was talking about. Type I fun being the fun that you're having in the moment, and the Type II fun the experience that you think back at and you're like, "It's fun, that that is done. That is over."
[Mary] Well, it's also… My father-in-law was Air Force, Vietnam-era fighter pilot, and they did survival training with them as well as a teambuilding…
[Kjell] Sure.
[Mary] And ways to test how you react under pressure situations without the safety net of well, I'm in a simulation. Like, no you're actually…
[Dan] No, you're not…
[Mary] You could actually die out here.
 
[Brandon] So, let's talk about the climax, because we're running… We only have a few minutes left. This book pushes toward lift off quite effectively. I wanted to ask, Kjell, this is your chance. What did she get right, what did she get wrong?
[Kjell] Well, let me tell you, it's clear that you've done your research, because the terminology that you use, even the tempo of the use of that terminology, is really good. The acronyms, people railing against acronyms…
[Chuckles]
[Kjell] That's all… That is all very common to the experience. So in the biographies that you've read, the pieces that you've borrowed, that feels very familiar and sounds very familiar. But you don't dwell on that. That is background. I really appreciate that. What you do… I thought you did a great job of is really focusing on the emotional reaction to various events. Talking… The description of taking off in a T-38 and the ground falling away below, and the same with her other flights, that sensation of taking off. Then the launch. It's not so much a description of necessarily what's happening. You certainly let the reader know what's going on. But it is that visceral reaction, it is the explanation of how she's feeling as she experiences these various milestones as they climb into orbit. That is really what rang true to me, is the description of the person that's going through it, and not so much the technical description of okay, now this is where the rocket is. So not just the launch, and not just taking off. Sitting in Mission Control. How you feel when you see a rocket explode. All these things rang very emotionally true to me.
[Mary] Oh, good. So, here are the hacks that I used to get that.
[Laughter]
[Mary] One is that I noticed in a number of the autobiographies when the astronaut began talking about their launch, their first launch, they switched to present tense. Chris Hadfield's… In his Astronauts' Guide to Life on Earth, says that he's switching to present tense because it is that vivid, that it feels like something that he has just done, because it is unlike… It doesn't fit… It doesn't get blended into other memories.
[Kjell] It's interesting that description of it. I see it in your book as well, is that it is not a narrative of… Like this is my launch narrative, this is what happened when I took off. It is snapshots of memories and emotions that you had at a particular time. So I remember the whole launch sequence, when the engines started, and that there are various specific times, when the launch shroud pulled away so we were able to see out the window for the first time. My first glimpse of the Earth, the arc of the Earth and the blues and whites contrasted against the sky. When… The first time I opened the hatch to get ready to do a spacewalk. Just various specific snapshots. It does feel very present and it's not… You can string those things together as a story, but… Yeah, these are very brief glimpses in time that you remember and just are able to relive.
[Mary] So, let me tell one other hack that I used… Or two other hacks. Because these will be useful for readers. Or for writers. One is that I basically grabbed the Mercury… Because NASA has these online. The transcripts of the Mercury launches and the Apollo launches. And used them as the outline for the scene, and wrote on top of it. Pulling up some stuff to… I'm like, "And we're going to skip past this very long thing." Then the other thing is that… Which Kjell is well aware of… I would write sections and be like, "Then the captain turned and said jargon."
[Laughter]
[Mary] "And he handled his jargon." Then I sent them off to experts. So I would email Kjell and I had a rocket scientist and for Fated Sky, I also had the person who does the algorithms to figure out where the landers should land. I would send it off to them and say, "Can you just play MadLibs with this?"
[Laughter]
[Mary] Katie Coleman also, who's a shuttle era astronaut. So, technically speaking, sections of this book were written by an astronaut.
[Brandon] Or multiple astronauts.
[Mary] Or multiple astronauts.
 
[Dan] The version of this that you sent to me was early enough that it still had a lot of that in there. I remember in particular, I'm fairly certain it's the sequence early on where she is flying the plane into Kansas, and it just broke, and there was about a half page all in brackets that said, "Okay, I haven't written this scene yet, but here's a bunch of jargon I've already collected." Then you just had some sentences that could be used to fit in as she talks to the tower to make the landing. Which is not something I've ever done. I thought that was a really cool trick too.
[Mary] I found a… Without one, I'm not sure if that's the one. There was one of them where I found a training video of how to… It's an Air Force training video from like the 70s or 80s of how to start a T-38. So there's an instructor talking through it, and it's real-time, and… So I'm just like, "Wait. Gonna pause that. What did they just say?"
[Chuckles]
[Dan] Write all this down.
[Mary] Because it's exactly the thing that I have, where I have a trainer, and I have a… The pilot in the back, and these are the back-and-forth between them. I'm like, "Okay. Noting that." My father-in-law had a number of things that were wrong with the… Which I think were all fixed by the time you guys read it. With some of the piloting stuff. Because he had flown all of the planes that I talked about. He was a test pilot, too. So…
 
[Kjell] So there is one piece, though…
[Mary] Yes.
[Kjell] In chapter 34…
[Dan] Oh. I'm excited.
[Mary] Yes.
[Kjell] Where you talk about… So it looks like a grab from shuttle era description of the TALs, the Transatlantic Abort. Talking about the OMS engine systems. So that is very, very shuttle specific…
[Mary] Ooooo...
[Kjell] So for anyone that knows kind of the shuttle lingo, they will see this as a… This is a shuttle lingo grab. So there may be pieces of that that are applicable. It's kind of the Mercury Gemini Apollo era vehicle. But this is probably some of that terminology. You'd have to really make sure that that fits. Because they didn't have an OMS… The shuttle had an OMS engine, but the…
[Mary] Right.
[Kjell] Apollo era did not.
[Mary] Of course they didn't.
[Kjell] We planned aborts for the shuttle, so that they would actually… Could land, so there's a Transatlantic Abort, there's a Return to Launch Site Abort. If you're aborting off of the capsule, you're basically just going into the drink somewhere.
[Mary] Random.
[Kjell] Along the flight path.
[Mary] Okay. Yeah. So that is… 
[Kjell] So we want to reconcile that with this era of spaceflight.
[Mary] Yeah. Thank you. I will totally go… Readers, you will not see that in there because I'm going to go fix that… And get more details on it.
[Dan] But the original version…
[Mary] The original…
[Dan] Will be available somewhere?
[Mary] We're putting the original version up on the… Of anything that I… Chapter 34, up on the Patreon, so you can see after I… See the Transatlantic Abort… No, that's… Of course. Right. I think I probably grabbed that because I couldn't find any stuff about aborting from Apollo and Mercury because of exactly that. Interesting. Huh. Anything else that I got wrong? Please tell me things.
[Kjell] Oh, boy. So, I just want to say, I really enjoyed this alternate history. Because there were brief glimpses… 
[Mary] That's not a thing I got wrong.
[Kjell] No, that's not.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] No, I'm… I don't have a whole lot…
[Dan] Yes, you did. Dewey loves [inaudible]
[laughter]
[Kjell] That's right. Dewey's in charge, and we hear… We see Aldrin and Armstrong and Collins name in the next… The new class of 35 astronauts. So there are pieces of our history that have been borrowed into this, and I really enjoyed that. I love that it started with a cabin in an earthquake, and that her description of the launch was shaking like a cabin in an earthquake.
[Mary] Yay. Circular stuff.
[Brandon] It is a really good book.
[Mary] Thanks.
[Brandon] You guys all have obviously read it, because we told you you had to, but if for some reason you haven't, you need to read this book, so that you can read the sequel.
[Mary] Right.
[Brandon] Which is…
[Mary] The sequel is all space, all the time. I mean, they have to get to space.
[Dan] Most of the time.
[Mary] Most of the time. Yes, and the sequel has a section that I changed because I was talking to Kjell at a convention and he talked about watching in The Martian movie someone changed direction in midair. I remember that he was continuing to talk, and I'm like, "I am rewriting a scene in my head, while this man is speaking to me."
[Laughter]
 
[Brandon] We are out of time, though. We've already gone about 30 minutes. So, Dan, you've got a writing prompt for us?
[Dan] Yes. Okay. So, what we want you to do is re-create for yourself a little of what Mary did with this. Take something you've already written. It doesn't matter what it is. Something you've already finished. Then write a prequel of that that takes place 40 years earlier.
[Brandon] All right. We want to thank Kjell for being on with us.
[Kjell] Thank you for having me.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.
 
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 7.19: Q & A at UVU

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2012/05/06/writing-excuses-7-19-qa-at-uvu/

Key Points:
Q: Why do books in a series become different as they go along?
A: Characters, stories, and stakes change. The writer grows.
Q: How do you approach the paragraph?
A: Each paragraph has a mini-arc, beginning, middle, end. Use topic sentences.
Q: When do you start thinking about a prequel?
A: When the backstory deserves it. But beginning writers should stick to in-late, out-early.
Q: How do you plot?
A: [James] Premise, brainstorming major events, major plot twists, and then I get so excited that I start writing. [Brandon] I write a little bit. Something sparks, is exciting, and I write that scene. Then I look at where do I go from this, what is a great ending, what's exciting about it, and work backwards to the start.
Q: How do you craft endings that are highly satisfying and leave the reader wanting more?
A: Answer all the questions set up in the beginning, then raise a new question. People live before and after the story -- point to that.
Q: How do you keep a really compelling and convincing villain from taking over the book?
A: Make the hero more proactive. Make sure the hero has a great scheme to achieve something awesome, so they are doing things, not just waiting to respond to the villain.
The details... )
[James] Okay. One day, you have a bunch of crazy people come to your house and kidnap you, and put you at a place called... It's an asylum for the criminally sane. [Laughter]
cutting out )

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789 101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 05:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios