mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 18.38: How Do You Write A Series With Books That Stand Alone?
 
 
Key Points: Deep Dive into A Function of Firepower. The title comes from a maxim, "Sometimes rank is a function of firepower." AI, Oafans, Petey, all these guns versus "The pen is mightier than the sword." I.e., an academic conference. Mutual assured destruction. Fermi's Paradox. Comedy depends a lot on subversion. Petey is an antagonist, but not villainous. Being a villain and being sympathetic are not necessarily separate. Sympathetic and monstrous at the same time. Sometimes you need a new tool. 
 
[Season 18, Episode 38]
 
[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses, Deep Dive, A Function of Firepower.
[DongWon] 15 minutes long.
[Erin] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.
[DongWon] I'm DongWon.
[Erin] I'm Erin.
 
[Howard] And I'm in charge for this episode, and I have been for some of the other ones. Kind of in charge. Mostly, the questions from my friends here are going to steer what happens…
[Laughter]
[Howard] The title of this book, A Function of Firepower, title comes from one of the 70 maxims. The maxim is "Sometimes rank is a function of firepower." Which obviously means sometimes who is in charge is not a question of who was elected to be in charge, who is most qualified to be in charge, it is who is the best armed. Which is, as I think we can all agree, a terrible way to decide who gets to run things. The story here begins with a crazy AI who has lots and lots of big guns and who is bound and determined to blow up anything that could cause the sort of mess that she's upset about. Then we have the return of the Oafan race, who own a whole bunch of spaceships that our heroes took because they didn't think the Oafans were still alive. But, hey, surprise, they are. Now we want our stuff back. Now, instantly, they are the largest armed force in the galaxy. Then, of course, throughout Schlock Mercenary, there's been Petey, where I always imagined as the sci-fi equivalent of an enlightened desperate. A benign god-king. Who is not as powerful as he used to be. Then I balanced those questions, all of those guns against the old saw… I say the old saw. It's Shakespeare, isn't it? The pen is mightier than the sword? That's Shakespeare?
[Mary Robinette] I'm going to say yes. I don't actually know.
[Howard] It's probably Shakespeare.
[DongWon] Odds are high, let's say.
[Laughter]
[Howard] [garbled ballad] is Shakespeare. So, yeah. The pen is mightier than the sword. I wanted to drive some of the actual solutions from an academic conference where people are trying to answer the question, where did all of the civilizations go that came before this galactic civilization? Are we doomed to wipe ourselves out? Is there a great filter? What is it that's going on? I really enjoyed writing it, but it was a challenge, because I knew it had to be more than just a thing that keeps the conclusion from sitting right next to the beginning. It needed to be more than a spacer.
[DongWon] You managed to create in the way that middle volumes are kind of a really dark chapter of this story. Right? I mean, the thematics as you just laid them out, tapping into Cold War era of mutual assured destruction. There's, like, overtones of almost, like, indigenous reparations. Then, answering this big question about like Fermi's Paradox in certain ways. Right? I'm… I know you grew up sort of child of the Cold War in some ways. How much was that weapons of mass destruction, mutual assured destruction, finding other answers to that and asking that question in a slightly different way… How much was that [garbled driving]
[Howard] That's been… I mean… Sigh. People use the word DNA wrong in this way all the time. That's been part of my DNA my whole life. I grew up… Yes, child of the Cold War. Parents telling me how incredibly scary the Cuban missile crisis was. And I think it was Korean Airlines flight something or other… Seven… KLA… I want to say 007, but it couldn't have been that because nobody would name their plane, their flight, 007. Korean Airlines flight shot down by the Russians in the early 80's.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. I remember that.
[Howard] I remember everybody at school thinking this is it. This is the thing that sets it all off. So, yeah, there… That's in my blood, that's the thing that my brain grew up with and grew out of… Not in the same way that you grow out of a pair of clothes, but in the way that a tree grows out of a given patch of dirt. So, yeah, I had to explore those themes. Also, those themes are… When you look at the various solution sets for Fermi's Paradox, one of them is the set that says intelligence always gets greedy and destroys itself in a way that leaves no traces. Which is a horribly negative thought to have, but it's fun to ask the question.
[DongWon] I think, because you've kind of created inverted war games here in certain ways. Right? Like, Chinook has decided that the long guns are bad, we need to get rid of the long guns, and she's going to do everything in her power to make that happen. Unfortunately, that also means the Cold War is now a shooting war.
[Howard] Yep.
[DongWon] And a lot of people are going to die as a result. Also, the actual problem is completely external to whatever is happening here. This is a misinterpretation of the data. But I guess I'm kind of curious, like, how did you get to that iteration of this? It seems like you took the basis… The base narrative that we see a lot, of the AI goes amok, decides humanity is the problem, but pushed it one step further in this way that she really is trying to save civilization in a certain way. Right? She believes she's doing the right thing. In a way that I found to be very relatable and kind of fascinating, watching her kind of go off the rails, even as she's editing herself and coming to some erroneous conclusions. But what was… I don't exactly know what I'm asking, but there's something very interesting in how your thinking about mutually assured destruction that I don't feel like I've ever quite seen in this way before.
[Howard] I'm so glad you noticed.
[Laughter]
[Howard] Because at some level, everything Schlock Mercenary is, is derivative of things that I've consumed. I named a book Big Dumb Objects because there's this whole sci-fi trope about big dumb objects. Better authors than I have gotten to many of these questions long before I did. So when I addressed them, I wanted to subvert or distort… Because comedy depends a lot on subversion, and maybe that's just… Maybe that accidentally resulted in something that from a philosophical standpoint is interesting rather than comedic. I'm so glad you noticed.
[Chuckles]
 
[Mary Robinette] Well, I mean, like… Circling back to Chinook when we're talking about the goals. Like, there's the authorial goal of these are the things, the questions that I need her to take. Then there's the character goals of this is why she's doing that. When you were mapping it out, when you were doing that outline, how aware of her internal motivations were you, and how much of that did you discover in the process of writing it?
[Howard] Ah. I knew pretty much all of what was driving her from the word go. There were the overt motives which is that her creator, her jailer, and her savior were all killed at the same time. It was very emotional for her. She suddenly had no way to process it. But also, the event triggered or set off a trigger like a timebomb in the system that she was now inhabiting, because the intelligence that had all of the Oafans trapped was so unhappy with themselves for what they'd done that they built this thing that would let them rewrite themselves so they could forget having committed the crime so that they could continue to keep the Oafans trapped. Well, now Chinook was there, the AI that used to live there moved out because they were ready for a new life, and she has this horrible emotional event and trips a system that begins rewriting her psyche in ways that she doesn't know she's doing. I got… I mean, when I first described that to myself in the outline, I got chills. I was like, "Oh, my goodness. Oh, what a landmine you've created for this character."
[Mary Robinette] Yes.
[Howard] "This is going to be fun." Then, everything after that…
[DongWon] Well, the core metaphor…
[Howard] Everything after that was just exploring the outgrowths of it.
[DongWon] I love the core metaphor of for these cycles of violence to perpetuate, for us to continue these wars, to continue these oppressions and genocides, we have to erase our own memory of what happened and rewrite our memory so we don't remember what we did a generation ago.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] And then we will repeat the same error, which keeps people oppressed, which keeps people in these positions, which perpetuates this long Cold War and all of that.
[Howard] Yeah, that when I did do on purpose. But… And I can't remember when, but I recall at one point deciding, "Oo. You know what? I don't want to say that part out loud. I want to just leave that at that level as a discovery exercise for the reader." Speaking of discovery exercises, we're going to go discover something and come right back after the break.
 
[Howard] Hey, everybody. It's Howard. If you go to kickstarter.com/profile/howardtayler spelled T.A.Y.L.E.R. all one word, you will find that we are getting ready to put Mandatory Failure, Schlock Mercenary book 18 into print, and you can get a copy for your very own self. We are super excited about this. I've done a bonus story for it that [Ethan Kozak] is illustrating. The book is glorious and wonderful. It's one of my very favorites. It's one of Sandra's very favorites. I'm sure that the moment we're able to put it into your hands, it will be one of your very favorites. Kickstarter.com/profile/howardtayler all one word except not with the all one word part, I didn't need to tell you that, you knew that. Just spell it with the ER and you'll be fine. Thanks.
 
[Howard] And we're back. What are we going to discover next?
[Mary Robinette] So, let's talk a little bit about Petey and what Petey is going through here.
[Howard] Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] Again, like, by this point, we really like these characters. You're doing stuff to them that I have feelings about. Why? Why?
[Chuckles]
[Howard] For a long time, when I created the character of Petey, the trope that everyone expected and they been waiting for this shoe to drop for a decade or more, was, "Oh, yeah, he runs a galaxy. He's going to turn out to be awful. We're going to have to kill him, we're going to have to fight him. He's going to be a bad guy." I needed to set things up so that that didn't happen. The easiest way to do that was to put pressure on him where he has to do violent and unpleasant things, and he always manages to do it in as nonintrusive a way as possible, and actually to back away from the options that a true tyrant would have taken.
[DongWon] Do you consider Petey a villain?
[Howard] I don't, but I consider him frightening.
[Mary Robinette] I mean, he definitely serves an antagonist purpose, but…
[DongWon] Yeah, he fits the antagonist role, especially in volume 3, which will talk about in [garbled episode]
[Howard] He's an antagonist, but I don't see him as villainous. Does that make sense?
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. Which is, I think, why I'm like these are characters that I wind up caring about because it's not just the… It's like all of them.
[DongWon] I mean, Chinook is like the primary villain of this book. Right? I also find her probably to be the most sympathetic character in this book as well. Right? Those things aren't necessarily separate. There are ways in which I really like Petey. Also, I find Petey to be the scariest thing in these books. I consider the arc of all of this is… Or the fundamental arc really is as much what do we do about Petey as it is what do we do about these dark matter intelligences that are determined to destroy the universe.
[Howard] Well, the fact that… There's that… The UNS, they're having some High Admirality meeting and somebody mentions Petey and somebody else says, "What are you doing? You might as well just invite him in." Then he shows up and says, "I don't actually need to be invited."
[DongWon] I was already here.
[Howard] "I've been here the whole time." One, that's a fun joke to tell. Two, that's yet another cementing of, guys, when something is super intelligent and superpowerful whether or not it is super benign, it's scary.
[DongWon] Yeah. Exactly.
[Howard] That's actually echoed by something that happened very early in Schlock Mercenary, which is my discovery that from any perspective other than Schlock's, Schlock is a monster. So, placing a character we like in a way that you don't have to turn the book very much to one side or the other to realize, "Oh. You're really scary." That was very fun for me.
[Laughter]
[DongWon] Well, I mean, you do such a good job of that, of so many of your heroes are also quite monstrous in certain ways and capable of truly mind-boggling acts of violence. Right? Like, even your human scale protagonists are often capable of truly astonishing acts of violence. Right? Whether that's pulling the arms off the enemy ship's captain or…
[Mary Robinette] I was thinking that that…
[Laughter]
[Mary Robinette] When you were talking, it was like…
[DongWon] Or one person in power armor just destroying an armada.
 
[Erin] It seems like it's really on cue with the theme… Like, getting back to that kind of mutual assured destruction, like, I think there's something really… Wholesome is not the right word, but in realizing that monster… Like, everyone is… People are both sympathetic and monstrous at the same time, and that's what makes the whole situation so terrifying.
[Howard] Yeah. The… Again, coming back to the question of Fermi's Paradox, the idea that as civilizations developed technologically, their ability to destroy themselves permanently… Not just a portion of themselves, but to just wipe themselves out of existence, increases. That's an important theme here, and I wanted to illustrate it in a way that lets us explore a possible alternative. Which is what that whole scholarly convention was, and is… Elizabeth, who ends up running the scholarly convention, she was roped into traveling with the Toughs because her boyfriend was one of the mercenaries and she just followed him onto the ship and suddenly realized she was cooking for a group of professional sociopaths and wasn't sure she fit in. In this book, I wanted to put her in a position to steer things, to guide things away from all of the violence and disaster.
[DongWon] Well, she's really the antidote to the title. Right? Like, rank is a function of firepower, but also, we see her get promoted out of being a cook, just for being smart and competent and willing to say the thing that no one else is willing to say. Right? It's almost like your… In creating this hero organization of these mercenaries, the antidote to just taking power at the end of a long gun really is recognizing and rewarding competence and forthrightness. It's in a world where not only rank is a function of power, firepower, but ethics is a function of firepower, to have an antidote to that, I think, really essential to making this book work.
 
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. So, along the lines of making this book work, it also had to function as setting up in the launchpad for the final book. So when you were… So let's talk about, since this is a deep dive and we're full of spoilers, let's talk about the ending.
[Howard] In the end of the previous book, the end of Mandatory Failure, the Pa'anuri, the bad guys, blow up one of Petey's cities. It was during this book that someone figures out, "Oh, I think I know how the Pa'anuri long gun works. They don't have a targeting mechanism… Their targeting mechanism… They can see certain kinds of power sources, and they are walking their shots. What are they aiming at? They're aiming at Petey. They're trying to destroy his core power generator, which, by the time we get to the end of the book, we realize that's the tool that he needs in order to fight back. They blow a piece of it up. I knew that was… That was part of the original outline, is that we blow up something that creates a puzzle in book 18, we blow up something that creates a disaster in book 19. Cueing that up was a lot of fun. Honestly, one of the things that was the most fun about it was… And this is going to sound silly, I'm sure. Using brush pens and circle templates to create some of the energy effect shapes that I wanted to create, and then sending them to the colorist and saying, "Look. There is no actual astronomical or physics analog for the colors that these things should be. Just make it look scary and dangerous and loud and hot and big and whatever." Travis ran with it.
[DongWon] Yeah. I was going to say, we… We're a writing podcast, so obviously we're talking about the narrative structure and the writing, but on the art front, you really pushed yourself to a different level it feels like here. You got on… I don't know, you kind of got on your Jack Kirby bull shit in the best way.
[Chuckles]
[DongWon] It was really fun to see some of these bigger scope, bigger scale intergalactic war things happening. You really start pulling out these big guns, no pun intended, by the end of this one.
[Howard] I leveled up the writing earlier in my career than I leveled up the art. That might be because I joined the Writing Excuses podcast…
[Laughter]
[Howard] In 08, and have never been part of an art podcast. Never. But I remember, it was a convention, it was at GenCon, I was talking to Lar deSouza and complaining about how much my hand hurt using this one pan trying to create lines. He looked at what I was doing and said, "Here. Take this." A [fidona suke] polymer nib short brush pen. I grabbed it and was like, "Oh, my gosh. A light touch makes a skinny line, and a hard touch makes a fat line, but it doesn't splay like a brush. Oh, this is amazing. This is so cool." Took it back to my booth. He gave it to me because he's a hero. Took it back to my booth, and drew a book cover with it. I think that was 2015. Just started to learn to use those tools and that piece of the toolbox was critically important for the finale, because now I could render some of these pictures that I just didn't have the skill set for earlier. Weird to talk about that on a writing podcast.
[Mary Robinette] But it's I think it's very much to the point, that there are… There is a tool that you don't know that you need to add to your toolbox. Like, that's… We talk about it as a metaphor all the time, and you're talking about it is a very literal real thing.
[Laughter]
[Mary Robinette] It's like, "Oh, here's a new tool. Physical tool." I think that that's something that everyone can take away. It's like you… Just getting the tool is not enough, it's learning how to use the tool that's really where the magic is.
[Howard] I think one of the things that Lar said was "When the student is ready, the master will appear." I had tried to use brush pens before and just couldn't. I tried several. Simply could not make them work. Then I sat down with him, and in 30 seconds, the lines were coming off my hand the way they needed to. I was like, "This pen is magical. I never…" Then he said, "When the student is ready, the master will appear. You are now ready for this tool. Congratulations." We are just about out of time. The conclusion of this book needed to set up the final story. That involved what I call like character arc blocking. Where I had to put chunks of the cast in different places. I had to scatter them because I knew that the final act, the next book, was going to come together with them in the very end coming together. I know that sounds shallow and silly and obvious, but shallow and silly and obvious… I've made the Schlock Mercenary joke already. Which of those words suggested that I would not do this? But sometimes those simple tools are the best. We work with those forms, and then, as you drill down on them and make them your own, they actually work. Hey, work. Homework. Who's got that?
 
[Erin] Yeah. I do. Speaking of tools you can make your own,what we're going to ask you to do for the homework this time is to work three words into your work in progress. They are expeditious, sock, and dragonfly. The best words. So, enjoy those and set them right into your work.
[Mary Robinette] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
 
[DongWon] Do you have a book or a short story that you need help with? We are now offering an interactive tier on Patreon called Office Hours. Once a month, you can join a group of your peers and us, the hosts of Writing Excuses, to ask any questions that are on your mind.
 
mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 17.47: The Linguistics of Disability 
 
 
Key points: Two models of disability, the medical model, where disability needs to be fixed, and the social model, where society and the environment need to change. When someone isn't comfortable with the chairs at the table, do you fix the chair or the person? Empathy, putting yourself in the other person's shoes, or sympathy, making yourself feel a little better for being such a nice person? Empathy asks how can I help you. Empathy is about listening. Why don't we make spaces accessible? 
 
[Season 17, Episode 47]
 
[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses, The Linguistics of Disability.
[Chelsea] 15 minutes long.
[Fran] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.
[Chelsea] I'm Chelsea.
[Fran] I'm Fran.
[Howard] And I'm Howard.
 
[Mary Robinette] Today, we're going to be talking about how to talk about disability. There's a couple of different models out there in the world. We've got another essay for you to read as a supplement to this, which is also The Linguistics of Disability, Or Empathy and Sympathy, that Fran has written. I highly recommend that you listen to that as a supplement to this episode. But let's first talk about the idea of a medical model versus a social model when talking about disability. So, medical model means that when you're talking about the disability, that the disability is something to be fixed, it is an illness, it is something that needs to be repaired or corrected. This comes from the medical community. The social model of disability holds that the problem is actually the way society is structured. That society itself is what disables people. For instance, someone who is a chair user, totally fine on flat surfaces, but if you have something that has a ton of stairs, the stairs are the problem, it's not the chair, because there's definitely ways to navigate without that, without stairs. So the idea is that you have two different ways to do that, and one of them basically says this person is less than human and needs to be made human. The other says this person is totally human, but maybe we should build our buildings in other ways. Does anyone want to, like, talk about some ways that that reflects in the fiction that we see for that we write, some failure modes that we can sometimes run across in fiction?
[Fran] To tie this to the previous episode, especially the body horror episode, the problem that needs to be fixed, the thing that is too scary to be embodied except in horror is kind of at the extreme end of what we're talking about, and what we were talking about. When we were asking in the previous episode for people to shift perspective and think about what it's like, to be inside and still have agency and still have choices, we're talking about shifting it to a more social model of horror, actually.
 
[Howard] I think in terms of linguistics, the… When we wrote the second edition of Xtreme Dungeon Mastery, we talked about ways to include everybody at the table. Sometimes, coming back to the word chair, sometimes the chairs at the table are not one-size-fits-all. Somebody needs a special chair. We did a little role-play in the book, where someone says, "Hey, I… That chair doesn't work for me. I'm sorry to be a problem." The host says, "Oh, you're not the problem, the chair is the problem. We can fix the chair, we don't need to fix you." I come back to that all the time, when someone apologizes, "Oh, I'm sorry, I'm not good at stairs," "Oh, I'm sorry, I need to stop and take a breath." I'm sorry, you're not the problem. The problem is this context that we've created that renders you unable to participate at the level that the rest of us are participating. So let us, as a group, try and change that. I'm circling back to that, not because it's a fiction, but because in my own head by making that change in the way that I talk, in the way that I write about myself, I am positioning myself hopefully, fingers crossed, to write better about it when I put it in my fiction.
 
[Mary Robinette] There's a great TikTok that I recently saw by Jeremy Andrew Davis, which were going to link to in the liner notes. He explains it by saying when Superman comes here, he has a different set of abilities than humans do. He has super abilities. But if you imagine that… If you flip things and adjust canon a little bit, and humans have to go to Krypton, and everyone on Krypton has Superman levels of ability, then you have things like people are able to stop a locomotive. So you go to try to pull a door open, and as a human, you can't pull the door open because it's designed for someone who can move something with a thousand pounds of force. Leap over buildings with a single bound, there are no stairs because everybody just jumps up. They're like, "Well, why don't you just jump up? What do you mean, you were late to this meeting?" That's the kind of thing that you're thinking about with the social model is that the person's normal is their normal and they are trying to exist in a world that is designed for someone else's normal.
 
[Fran] I think absolutely that. And stemming from that, that existing in the world where that is normal, there's a really great essay up at the SFWA website where Valerie Valdez talks about why writing in second person is important for marginalized people. This is particularly true for disability narratives, including my own. When I wrote Clearly Lettered in a Mostly Steady Hand, it's narrated by a very angry Fiji mermaid in the middle of a cabinet of curiosities. But she's narrating for the audience an experience where second person's invoked and the reader loses agency over time. That experience of… That particular use of second person and loss of agency is something that I wanted to invoke as sort of an empathetic reaction to what it feels like to be disabled, in certain ways. That was sort of shifting gears a little bit on people, and it made a lot of people, including a couple reviewers, really uncomfortable. I kind of am okay with that. I'm actually very okay with that. In part, because that's the difference between empathy and sympathy. Sympathy is something that I'm doing to make myself feel better, a little bit, and empathy is something that is much more about the person's experience that is having the experience.
[Howard] Empathy is inherently uncomfortable. I hate it a lot. When the people around me hurt, I hurt too.
[Fran] Yes.
[Howard] What a stupid sense. I don't want it.
[Chuckles]
[Chelsea] But you do. You do want it.
[Howard] I know I do want it.
[Fran] Why do we want empathy, Chelsea?
[Chelsea] We want empathy so that we know… Like, I rely on my sense of empathy to understand… Okay, everybody's really happy. I feel their happiness too, and that everything is good. But there's also, like, bored and frustrated. I feel that, too. So, that's like a cue. It's like, what do you need?
[Fran] Yes.
[Chelsea] At this point. It's like, okay, I get that you're feeling frustrated here. How can I help you? If you don't have that, then you just continue to sail on with your whatever. Then you're a jerk.
[Howard] A world with no empathy would be like driving at night and nobody's cars had headlights or taillights.
[Fran] If you do proceed without empathy, if you proceed with something else, that's when you find your… Let's say, if your character has no empathy, but they want to express some sort of concern or connection with a person who is going through a thing, that's when things like, "I think you're such an inspiration," or "You must be so strong," start to come out of people's mouths. That, Chelsea, what you said about how you are feeling about this, what can I do to help you, puts that agency back in the hands of the person who needs it, rather than sort of getting the kudos, gold star stickers, for being someone who's forcing an opinion on the person who doesn't need the opinion.
[Mary Robinette] Well, something that you said in your essay, Fran, when you were talking about the "You must be so strong," is that it's a distancing thing.
[Fran] Yup.
[Mary Robinette] I had not thought about it in that way, but it is about… When you're approaching things from that angle, it is about reframing them in a way that you are comfortable engaging with them, rather than the ways in which the person needs you to engage, and that empathy is much more about listening. It's like that is such a good simple frame, for, like, evaluating my own choices about things that I say in response to people.
 
[Mary Robinette] Shall we take a moment to pause for the book of the week? Then, Chelsea, I want to see what it was that you clearly had a thought, and I want to see what that was when we come back. So, our book of the week is Being Seen by Elsa Sjunneson. This book, Elsa is a deaf blind activist. This is a memoir series of essays. She's… She fences, she writes, she does all of these things that you would think… In a book, you'd be like, "Oh, really?" But this is her real life. This book has been… It's just recently won a major award in Washington state, it was nominated for a Hugo, it's been up for major awards all over the place. She just had a documentary, a short documentary about her life, and covers some of the ground that is in this book. It is wonderful. Highly recommended. Being Seen by Elsa Sjunneson.
 
[Mary Robinette] All right. So, coming back, Chelsea, what's on your mind there?
[Chelsea] Well, I just… The wheels are kind of turning, right? Because I'm always thinking about the social model of disability. Because a lot of times, like our physical spaces and our environments are not designed for everyone. It bothers me. Because, before I moved in here, I lived in a building that was like accessible. All public areas were designed with accessibility in mind. This was the point that really drilled it home to me. Accessible spaces are accessible to everyone. They make using this space easier for everyone. So why don't we do it? Why do we not do it? So I'm always thinking about this now. I'm always thinking about this when I'm doing world building and design. I'm like, very deliberately thinking about, like, how good is the design of this environment. When I say good, I mean how many people can just use it without thinking about it or having to do anything special.
[Howard] The reason we don't do it is that the people doing the design don't have needs that stray very far from what they perceive the baseline to be. It's the… What was the show? The IT crowd or something, where the… All the motion detectors that keep the lights on won't detect people with brown skin. So you had to have a white person walk into the room periodically to keep your lights on. Why? Because we're not testing these things with the full range of people that are going to be using them. Because the designers are not comprised of a demographic that fits who's using it.
[Mary Robinette] Well, the other thing that we talk about is, like, people… One of the things that happens is that people will designed for the one… People that they see around them. If you are designing spaces that people cannot access, then, of course, you are not going to see examples. It's like, well, how often do we really get people who have problems with stairs coming here? It's like, well, we'd get that more often if you didn't have stairs.
[Howard] They stopped coming.
[Chelsea] The answer to the question is built right in. One of my more local examples, the apartment that I live in is directly in front of a separated bike lane. It's one lane across wide, they took an entire lane out of the road and turned it into a bike lane. It's two way, and it's actual. There are like clear directions as to how you cross intersections when you're using the bike lane. Notice that I don't say when you're a cyclist. Because what happened was, when the downtown cycle network started introducing these things so that we get across downtown using these safe bike lanes, all of a sudden wheelchair users and motorized scooter users came out of the woodwork. There's always somebody on the roll in the bike lane. It's so great.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. I saw that.
[Chelsea] Because sidewalks suck.
[Fran] Sidewalks suck.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. Saw that in…
 
[Howard] Well, when we… When we threw a pandemic and the whole world came, we started doing conventions and meet ups and things remotely via Zoom. We met people we had never seen before. People who have always been with us, but have never been with us, because they couldn't attend in person, because they couldn't commute. They couldn't, for whatever reason, they couldn't get there before, but now that they can get there with a camera and a microphone, they're part of the community again. Boy, howdy. If we learn nothing else from the pandemic except that, I will count myself happy, because that's so important to us as a society.
[Fran] But did we learn it? Did we learn it, really?
[Garbled]
[Howard] I want to think some of us did.
[Fran] No, because when the pandemic is over, and we're not like… We're doing it in person events. I mean, me personally, I'm so glad to see people's faces, I'm so glad to be in their visible spaces. But I kind of also wish that I had like… Kind of like an iPad strapped to my chest so that I could bring somebody who couldn't come visibly.
[Mary Robinette] Yep.
[Fran] Yep.
[Chelsea] With me.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. This is, having been doing some con running during this year, the big barrier to that is actually the Internet because… Specifically, the amount of money hotels want to charge for Wi-Fi. To do, just as an example, Dis Con 3, we had to spend $40,000 just on Internet, which a smaller con can't do. So, all of these things are complicated, but most of them are complicated because someone has decided this is a way that they can make money. Also, that it is a problem that doesn't apply to them. So, let me wrap this up with a science fictional example that is also a real world example. When the astronaut program started, astronauts had to have 2020 vision, because all of the requirements were based on being a test pilot. Then a funny thing happened. In the 2000s, when we started doing long-duration missions, astronauts eyes changed on orbit, and they started to require glasses. They no longer had 2020 vision, and also, the astronaut corps started to age, and become middle-aged, people in their 50s, and they suddenly needed bifocals. They changed the requirements to become an astronaut, because it turns out that you don't need 2020 vision to function in space. But really what it turns out is that the people who were making the decisions suddenly had the thing that they had considered previously to be a disability. So when you are thinking about your own fiction, you need to be thinking about it from a couple of different places. As we've talked about, be thinking about it from an empathy point of view. You're thinking about it from the social model point of view.
 
[Mary Robinette] That brings us around to our homework. Chelsea, I think you have the homework for us. Right?
[Chelsea] I do. I do. Now, if you go all the way back to episode two, we had the homework that was write a scene with two characters. One with a disability and one without. Write it from each character's POV, paying particular attention to setting. What I want you to do is I want you to write as an insider versus writing as an outsider, or writing a medical model approach to the setting versus writing a social model setting. Take that setting and the person with the disability and the person without the disability, and write those spaces again. See what happens when the world building shift changes.
[Fran] I love that assignment so much.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. It'll be a lot of fun. This has been Writing Excuses. You are out of excuses. Now go write.
 
mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 13-4: Protagonists Who Aren't Sympathetic

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2018/01/28/13-4-protagonists-who-arent-sympathetic/

Key points: Non-sympathetic protagonists, aka antiheroes, come in two flavors, classic and pop! Classic or literary antiheroes don't protag. They don't move the story along, even though they are where a protagonist should be. Pop is an evil person who still does good. Why write an unlikable character? Well, one reason is a reverse character arc, where the character goes down, then redeems himself and comes back up. It does make readers uncomfortable! Sometimes it's a signal that the character is becoming an antagonist. Sometimes we do it to mimic reality -- some people aren't very likable! To make it work, hang a lantern on it, give the reader subtle hints that it is okay to dislike this character. Modern antiheroes? The Punisher, or other bad guys with a heart of gold. We like them because we wish we could forget the limits and just do it. Hulk smash! Also, the pop culture antihero has dramatic tension -- they aren't likable, but they are proactive and competent. Built-in tension! Or maybe they are likable and proactive, but not competent. Again, built-in tension. You may not like them, but when the aliens show up, they are the hero you need.
Motorcycle jackets and long hair... )

[Brandon] All right. Let's wrap this one up. I have some homework for you. I want you to take a slightly different spin on this. I want you to write a protagonist or a hero that the reader is supposed to like and does like. Right? You're going to make them likable. But you're going to try to create dramatic tension by having them… By having the reader not want this protagonist to succeed. So, generally, the reader's going to have information that the protagonist doesn't, or they're going to see things more clearly than the protagonist does. So you want the hero to fail. He or she is trying something, and you like them, but you still want them to not succeed. See if you can do that. It's very difficult. It's an interesting thought experiment. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 11.38: The Elemental Relationship As a Sub-Genre

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2016/09/18/11-38-the-elemental-relationship-as-a-sub-genre/

Key Points: Relationship is often the number two thing in a book. Often the main plot, the driver, is another elemental genre, but relationship adds, either throughout the book or in smaller sections. Relationship often helps make a main character more sympathetic. How do you add relationship without letting it take over? What's the driver? Use that to push evolution in the relationship, without making relationship the main problem. Think about where you spend your words -- the problem with the most words is the most important one! Often there are true hybrids. Often just use relationship as a seasoning, with moments where characters stand in support of each other, or reveal a shared history. Suggest a relationship, and let the reader tell their own story about it. Subplots need to evolve, with the reader interested in how it is going to develop. Seasoning can be fine, too.

Who's driving, anyway? )

[Brandon] We are out of time. I want to give us some homework. My suggestion to you for homework is that two weeks ago, if you did what Dan told you, you took a romantic comedy and you highlighted the beats of this romantic comedy. I want you to take that outline that you've done, and if you didn't do it, go do it. I want you to change it into a different kind of relationship. I want you to take these same beats and say, "All right. Now it's mentor student. And I'm going to build the same story around this, but with this very different relationship." Or I'm going to be buddy cop, or I'm going to be mother-daughter, or I'm going to be whatever. Take this, take the same beats, and transition it to a new type of relationship.
[Howard] So you take the beat map from While You Were Sleeping and write Lethal Weapon with it.
[Brandon] That's right. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 06:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios