mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker

Writing Excuses 20.45:  Now Go Write - Break All the Rules (Part 1)


From https://writingexcuses.com/20-45-now-go-write-break-all-the-rules-part-1


Key points: Break all the rules. Use passive voice! Does your protagonist have to have agency or do anything at all?


[Season 20, Episode  45]


[Erin] Hey, everybody. This is Erin, and I've got a question for you. What have you learned from Writing Excuses that you use for your own writing? Now, we talk a lot about tools, not rules. Which means there are things that we're going to say that you're going to be like, yes, that is for me. That's the tool I'm going to use in my next project. And there are others that you're going to be like, uh,  I'm going to leave that to the side. And what we want to know is which of the things that we're saying have really worked for you? What's the acronym you're always repeating? What's the plot structure you keep coming back to? What's a piece of advice that has carried you forward, when you've been stuck in your work? Or that you've been able to pass on to another writer who's needed advice or help? However you've used something that you've learned from us, we want to know about it, and we want to share it with the broader community. Every month, we're going to put one of your tips or tricks or tools in the newsletter, so that the rest of the community can hear how you have actually taken something that we've talked about and made it work for you. And I'm personally just really excited to learn about those, because a lot of times, y'all take the things that we say and use them in such ingenious and interesting ways to do such amazing writing that I'm just like chomping at the bit to get in these tools and tips and share them with everybody else. So if you're interested, please go to our show notes, and fill out the form there, and be part of this project and just share with us what you're doing, what you've learned, and how are you using it so that we can share with everybody else. Really excited, again, to get all this in because, honestly, what we say is made real and important and meaningful by what y'all do with it. With that, you're out of excuses. Now go tell us what works for you.


[Howard] [pre-roll gusto add copy take one] Speaking as a small business owner, I don't think anyone starts a business for the joy of calculating tax withholdings. That's where Gusto comes in, to take the stress out of payroll, benefits, and HR, so you can focus on why you started your business in the first place. Gusto is online payroll and benefits software built for small businesses. It's all in one, remote friendly, and Incredibly easy to use. So you can pay, hire, on board, and support your team from anywhere. Automatic payroll, tax filings, simple direct deposits, health benefits, commuter benefits, workers comp, 401k, you name it, Gusto makes it simple and has options for nearly every budget. Get direct access to certified HR experts to help you through the toughest HR situations. Try Gusto today at gusto.com/wx and get 3 months free when you run your first payroll. That's 3 months  of free payroll at gusto.com/wx.


[Mary Robinette] This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons, and friends. If you would like to learn how to support this podcast, visit www.patreon.com/writingexcuses.


[Season 20, Episode 45]


[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses. Now go write - break all the rules (part 1).

[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.

[DongWon] I'm DongWon.

[Erin] And I'm Erin.


[Erin] And I am excited to be talking about one of the sections that I am writing in the Now Go Write craft book, which is Break All the Rules. So I am very excited about writing rules and not following them. Because I like to destroy things, I guess...

[laughter]

[Erin] [garbled] I don't know.

[DongWon] Oppositional, even to yourself.

[Erin] Yeah. Exactly. Like, why? And so what I started doing when I was writing this section is I kept coming up with, like, different rules and how to break them. And they each, like, kind of spun off into their own little mini-essay. And so what I thought I would do for this episode is I have four of them that I want to talk about, and I wanted to sort of throw them out and say like, what do y'all think about this particular rule, when it should be broken, and I'm going to have Mary Robinette roll a virtual die to decide which one we talk about first.

[Mary Robinette] We're starting with number four.

[Erin] We're starting with number four, which is passive voice. So the rule here is do not use passive voice. Can one of you explain what this is, in case somebody missed it in all their writing classes?

[Mary Robinette] So, um, if you can say... It's basically she will be chased by zombies is different than zombies chased her. And zombies chased her is active, she will be... Or she is chased by zombies is passive, and it's supposed to be a distancing thing. That you can pick a more active verb, that you can make it more immediate.

[Erin] Yeah. I often see this as like, don't ever use is. Like, if is exists in your story, beat it to death with the adverbs that you also should be taking out of the story, which we will not be talking about today. But I really think that passive voice can be very, very useful. and a couple of ways that I think of that you can use passive voice to good intent, I'll tell you, tell me what you think, and if you have other ones. So one is by depersonalizing actions on purpose. So, like, she is chased by zombies is a couple things. Like, maybe the point is not who's doing the chasing, but that she is being chased. In the way that police actions are often reported...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] In the news, where it's like, the person, like, was killed by the cops, versus, the cops killed this person.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[Erin] Shows the attitude of what is important in this case.

[DongWon] The suspect was struck by 17 bullets. Like...

[Erin] Exactly. Which is...

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[Erin] Yeah, where it's like who even shot the bullets?

[DongWon] Yep.

[Erin] Who knows? They were just struck by those bullets. The important thing is that they were stopped and here's how, not who did the stopping.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] It shows where the focus of the story is, and if you're trying to show, hey, in this particular story, the focus is on the 17 bullets and the person being ended, not, like, who is doing it, then that's a way to use passive voice. I would say another one is if the who is doing it is a surprise. So I was bitten... By a zombie, is different...

[Chuckles]

[Erin] Than a zombie bit me, if you don't know a zombie exists in the story.

[Mary Robinette] Right.

[DongWon] Right.

[Erin] I was bitten by, like, gives you a chance to ramp up into the reveal of the sentence...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Which is the noun. Like, it is like the, oh, you weren't bitten by your dog, you were bitten by a zombie. Holy crap. And so that's another reason to use passive voice.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[DongWon] I mean, I think active voice, in general, or, like, the activity level of The Voice is a dial. Right?

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[DongWon] And you could be Spinal Tap and say this always has to be at 11, or you can crank it down sometimes. And, like, you can deliberately slow things down and deliberately add a little padding in there. And sometimes those extra words will slow your reader's pace down when you want them to slow down a little bit and be a little bit more abstract and then ramp it up again later as things pick up for whatever reason. Right? And so I think being able to use the passive voice is just another tool in your kit. Right? Not to be too on the point, but tools, not rules. This is a tool that you can use. Do people overuse it when they're first learning to write? Probably.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[DongWon] But...

[Mary Robinette] It's also a tool, like, you can also use it to do some really creepy...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] Things. Like, if you want your character to be a prisoner in their own body. So... The door was opened by her own hand...

[Erin] Oooh!

[Mary Robinette] Yeah. But she has no control over that. That can be, like, ugh!

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Yeah. And I think also, to, like super agree about the dial, it's like if you ever go out, not to use karaoke for everything...

[Chuckles]

[Erin] And hear somebody who is like a great belter, they have a very strong voice...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] But if they just belt the entire song at the exact same level, at a certain point...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] You will tune it out. Like, you're just like, at first, you'll be like, oh, exciting that you can do that, and then you'll be like, oh my gosh, like, again? And so I think that sometimes you see people use so much activity that it just becomes like Jane ran up the hill, Jane grabbed the bucket, like, everything becomes kind of same-y. And I think another thing that passive voice can do is to provide, like, a frame or a bed for the activity that is happening. The thing around it that makes the more active voice sentence stand out. Because it is the one that is doing it differently. It is belting out of a slow, calmer verse that brings all of this attention to...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Why have you become loud at this moment?

[DongWon] It can give us what we think of in film as an establishing shot. You know what I mean? Like, a broader framework of the action, and then we zoom into the more active thing that's happening. She was chased by a horde of zombies. she reached for the gun. You know what I mean?

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[DongWon] And the difference between those two things lets us zoom out and zoom in in a way that I think is really, really useful. And it's just a great tool in your kit.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[Erin] Exactly. The last thing I'll say about this one... Sorry, I didn't mean to... Ah, is to like I think things like weather, time...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Setting... I mean, yes, the sun can beat down upon you, and, like, the wind can beat you down or buffet you, but, like, sometimes, like, the setting is just existing.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] It's not actively opposing you. It is merely the thing that you are moving through. And it is nice to just kind of give it a bit more of a... It is passively there and doing things and you are doing things in the setting, as opposed to the setting is doing things to you.

[DongWon] Sometimes the wind was blowing through the trees is a better sentence than the wind blew through the trees.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[DongWon] Right? Sometimes you want that extra little bit of softness there.

[Erin] Yeah. And the feeling of ongoingness...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Like, the wind was blowing through the trees sounds like something that's happening over time, whereas the wind blew through the trees seems like it just started.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] And it is a new action that you have to pay attention to right in this moment.

[DongWon] Yep.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.


[Erin] Okay, another number.

[Mary Robinette] Two.

[Erin] Two. This is very similar in some ways. The inactive protagonist.

[Mary Robinette] Ah!

[Erin] Does your protagonist have to have agency or do anything at all? Does your... Answer the question... Does your protagonist have to have agency or do anything at all?

[Mary Robinette] So I've been thinking about this a lot, and I don't think that your protagonist does have to have agency or do anything at all. But I do think that it's going to be a more interesting story if they have an interior life, and are to some degree aware of their lack of agency.

[Erin] Yeah. I think that they have to do something, but the something can be internal.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[Erin] Not externally focused. So, a protagonist who survives... If you think about it, a lot of horror  movies are about survival. Sometimes that survival is active, like, I grabbed the knife and threw it at the zombie horde. But sometimes it's just like I waited, I listened, like... Which are actions, but they're very like... They're not actions of agency. They're actions of reaction. I'm trying to figure out what the threat is and how to deal with it.

[DongWon] I mean, ironically, we see this a lot in video games, actually, of a protagonist who's very passive. And very reactive to the situation around them, and then the active choices are being made by the side characters, the companion characters, NPCs, things like that, in part because they don't want to put too much on the perspective of the player. And so... It's sort of why we often see fan art or fan stories about side characters more than the main character. You think about like Mass Effect or Dragon Age fandoms. These are all obsessed with those side characters and less interested in the main characters. The main characters just reacting to whatever is going on. And we see this a lot in anything that has an audience surrogate kind of character. A lot of, weirdly, superhero movies fall into this model, too. Where a lot of times the main character is kind of inactive for a lot of it, and is responding to the things happening around them as the world acts crazier and crazier. But the big choices are being made by the villain, the big choices are being made by companions with them.

[Erin] Yeah. And that can create such an exciting feeling of tension, because often in our own lives, we don't have as much agency as...

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[Erin] We wish we did over the broader events happening around us. And so we can really identify... I think that's why it works for an audience surrogate.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] If the character has really strong agency, we maybe don't feel as much like we identify with that character,  more as we enjoy them. But we don't feel like that could be me. Because if aliens were attacking my town, I also would be hiding  out in my closet.

[Mary Robinette] Oh, yeah.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] And not necessarily, like, fighting them tooth and nail, scrapping right there.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah. It is one of those things where... like, I just finished a short story where the main character was a literal inanimate object.

[Erin] Oooh!

[Mary Robinette] And so there is no action that the character can take. Because it does not have movement. But it has all of the tension, because it's... Because it can't react. So, like, aliens coming in and you need to hide... You're not going to go out and fight the aliens? Yeah. Yeah, that's going to be a really tense thing because at any moment, they could come, and you still have no agency there, because they're aliens from another world.

[DongWon] Yeah. I would argue that the picaresque is an entire genre based on having a very inactive protagonist.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[DongWon] I mean, they're active in that they go from point A to point B, but they're not the ones who are inspiring the events when they arrive at that place. They're observing it and reacting to it. So, something like Confederacy of Dunces or something like that is... He's not actively making any real choices in his life. I mean, Ulysses, kind of the same... The Joyce's Ulysses kind of the same thing, of... I mean, kind of arguably, the original Ulysses, too. Anyways. But mostly that these characters are just wandering around and stuff is happening around them and they're observing it without really having a lot of influence on the outcome. And, I mean, these are some brilliant works of literature. They're very specific. They may not be for everyone. But there's absolutely space for a story in which your protagonist is kind of in the pocket.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah. But I think what Erin said about the... That they are still doing something...

[DongWon] Yes.

[Mary Robinette] Even if it's only an interior...

[DongWon] Yes.

[Mary Robinette] And that's evaluating or reacting...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] Or having an emotion.

[Erin] And often, like you said with video games, like, side characters will fill that role, like... Because something is changing, usually, in a story. So who is changing it? Either it is something that naturally changes, like the seasons. It is something that a character is changing, but it doesn't necessarily have to be your character. So I think I would say if you want to  have a more inactive protagonist, figure out where is the activity, where is the change coming from? Is it the world? Is it the other characters in the world? And then, how is your protagonist either a reflection, a survival of, a reaction to those active changes. And now it is time for us to take an action, and that is to go to break.


[DongWon] For more than a decade, we've hosted Writing Excuses at sea, an annual workshop and retreat in a cruise ship. You're invited to our final cruise in 2026. It's a chance to learn, connect, and grow, all while sailing along the stunning Alaskan and Canadian coast. Join us, the hosts of Writing Excuses, and spend dedicated time leveling up your writing craft. Attend classes, join small group breakout sessions, learn from instructors one on one at office hours, and meet with all the writers from around the world. During the week-long retreat, we'll also dock at 3 Alaskan ports, Juneau, Sitka, and Skagway, as well as Victoria, British Columbia. Use this time to write on the ship or choose excursions that allow you to get up close and personal with glaciers, go whale watching, and learn more about the rich history of the region and more. Next year will be our grand finale after over 10 years of successful retreats at sea. Whether you're a long time alumni or a newcomer, we would love to see you on board. Early bird pricing is currently available, and we also offer scholarships. You can learn more at writingexcuses.com/retreats.


[Mary Robinette] So when Erin says take a break, what we actually mean is, it's time for homework. When we originally recorded this, it was going to be one episode, but we've decided to split it into two. So your homework for this episode is to write down some of the rules you think you follow most rigidly in your own writing. Like, are you a big fan of show, don't tell? Do you think that you should cut all words that end with ly? But take one of these rules and begin to think about ways you can challenge the rule, you can break it, you can soften it in some way. What happens if you invert it? So, that's your homework.


[Mary Robinette] You're out of excuses. Now go write.


 
mbarker: (BrainUnderRepair)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 13.40: Fixing Character Problems, Part I
 
 
Key points: What do you do when readers say your character is boring? How do your characters relate to the plot? What about it matters to them, why are they hurting, what choices are they making? What is the role of the character in the story, and what unusual ways can they fill that role? When main, or point-of-view characters, are boring, they probably need something to be passionate about, while secondary characters need more external attributes developed. Make the character more proactive. Check for flanderization, and make sure you are using all their facets. Have you pushed yourself on a character and been rewarded? Yes. The hot girl who became a favorite main character. Sgt. Schlock growing a conscience. How did you do it? What are the steps? First, see the hot girl through someone else's experience. Show that she is an individual. Show that shopping is a hobby, and what is important to her.
 
Here it comes! )
[Brandon] This is Writing Excuses, Fixing Character Problems, Part I.
[Mary] 15 minutes long.
[Dan] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And this is going to take more than 15 minutes.
[Brandon] I'm Brandon.
[Mary] I'm Mary.
[Dan] I'm Dan. 
[Howard] I'm Howard. 
 
[Brandon] The reason this is a part one is, with our new format we started last year, we have different teams of podcasters, and I wanted to try something where we pitched some of the same questions at one team and then the next team, and see how the answers get shaken up and see how it feels different, because this is a… This is really a method podcast right here, this one, where it's like how do you go about this specific thing. In this case, it's how do you go about fixing problems with characters. So we're going to pitch most of these out Howard and Dan, because Mary and I will be next week in Chicago.
[Dan] Because we write really problematic characters.
[Chuckles]
[Brandon] Actually, you are one, so…
[Dan] It makes it easy.
 
[Brandon] So, my first question is, readers say your character's boring. What do you do?
[Dan] Make them interesting.
[Brandon] Ooo, okay.
[Mary] Well, thanks, Dan, for that insight.
[Dan] Yeah. Anytime. Okay. So, what I like to do with my characters is to figure out, and I've talked about this before, is how they are specifically related to this plot. Not in the sense that the plot is driving them, but what about this plot matters to them? What is hurting them? What choices are they making that no one else in the same situation would make? Often, when the character is boring, it's because those links are very soft.
[Howard] Oh, interesting. See, I'll often approach it from the more plot-driven way, which is to ask what is, in as clichéd terms as possible, what is this character's role in the story? Is it supposed to be a plucky sidekick? Is this the protagonist? Is this the grizzled veteran hero whatever? What is their role in the story? What are the things that they are supposed to be doing in order to move the story forward? Then, I follow that up with, what is the most interesting/destructive/unexpected way that they could fill that role? Even if it breaks the story, it's those… I put those answers on the table, because often, as I'm coming up with that, something will shake loose and I'll realize, "Oh, wait. That is… That's so crazy it just might work. Because that's not clichéd at all."
[Chuckles]
[Brandon] So, that's interesting, because when I've had this problem, sometimes it's the opposite problem. Meaning I have confined a character too much to a role, and I'm not allowing them to grow. In fact, the reason…
[Howard] That is absolutely… That is spot on. There are so many kinds of problems I can have with a character. Usually, when they're boring, it's because they're not doing anything interesting, and I start with the interesting things they have to do. Sometimes, they're boring because the things they're doing are predictable. Even if they're interesting things, they're predictable because they're fitting the story role too closely. Then, I ask the same question, what's the story role? What sort of extracurricular story roles can they fill in interesting ways?
[Mary] I think, for me, the way I handle it depends on whether I'm talking about a main character, a point of view character, or a secondary character. Because I don't handle it quite the same way for the two characters.
[Brandon] Well, talk us through the different ways.
[Mary] With the point of view character, I find when they are boring, it's usually having to do with the reader is not enjoying being along for the ride with them. So this often means that I have to give them something that they are passionate about that isn't directly related to the story, or I have to look at the ways that they are connected, as Dan was talking about, to the story. That I haven't sufficiently developed those. When I'm dealing with a secondary character, what I'm looking at are the external attributes of the character. Whereas, with a main character, it's all the internal attributes that are… That I think the reader is primarily responding to. So with a secondary character, there I'm looking at trying to make sure that I bring out a quirk or do something to make them more specific and distinct. But it's much more dealing with the way they are expressing and moving through the world, rather than the way they are experiencing the world, which is the way I tackle it with the main characters.
[Brandon] So, the times I've had the most trouble with this, I found the solution for me either is to make the character more proactive. This character doesn't… Often times, they just aren't doing enough. Everybody else is doing things around them, and they need something to work on themselves. Or, as the story I've shared before, when Dan read one of my more recent… It's been a few years now, books, and said, "The main character's the most boring one. Everybody else has passions about life and has character arcs, and your main character is static, and is playing a straight man for everyone else to bounce off of." Which, it's okay to have someone play the straightman for people to bounce off of, but when it's your main character and most of the viewpoints are from that person's viewpoint, it's going to be… End up being a boring story with this kind of hole at the center of it with all these active things happening around them.
[Dan] Another thing… We talked a few months ago about flanderization, and… Wear a character just becomes a quirk or a caricature of themselves. So I find… I don't do a lot of pre-work on characters all the time, but I try to, if I know I'm going to have a big cast, write up a quick sketch of who they are and try to make that is round as I can. Because if a character's boring, what's often going on is that I am just writing them the same way in every scene. They're not who they… They're not themselves, they're just that version of themselves that was in chapter one. So going back to that initial pre-write and saying, "Oh, there's all these other facets that didn't show up in the first chapter and I've been ignoring them, I need a way to pull those in."
 
[Brandon] Let's stop and talk about our book of the week, which is the Heroine Complex.
[Mary] Heroine Complex by Sarah Kuhn. This was pitched to me as The Devil Wears Prada with superheroes. It is a fun, kicky, literally often, story about the personal assistant… Told through the point of view of the personal assistant to a superhero. There are demons from another plane coming through, and the demons imprint on the first thing that they see. The story opens with them having, into a cupcake shop. So she is fighting demonic cupcakes. Which kind of tells you the tone all the way through. The thing that I love about this is that while it is about superheroes, it's actually about the interpersonal problems between the characters. I think that Sarah does a really good job of having characters that are very extreme, larger than life, but also very rounded.
[Brandon] Excellent. The Heroine Complex.
[Mary] By Sarah Kuhn.
 
[Brandon] All right. Question for you guys, and I'm going to ask this to the next week's podcasters as well. Are there times you've pushed yourself on a character and been rewarded? Meaning, the character was okay, but some of the feedback came back, maybe this character's little bland or you thought this character's not living up to what everyone else in the story is doing, and you pushed yourself, and it worked?
[Dan] I've got a great one for this. So, in the Serial Killer books, in book one, there's one character whose entire job is (A) to have a father who's a cop because I needed that particular thing to come out in a scene, and (B) to be really attractive so that my obsessive stalker main character could fixate on her. That character was Marcy, who, by the end of the trilogy, became many people's favorite character. That's because the writing group kept saying, "She is so one-sided and cliché. We need her to be more than just the hot girl." So pushing and giving her extra sides and giving her more to do really paid off.
[Brandon] Excellent.
[Howard] One of my favorite moments… And this wasn't something that grew out of reader feedback. It was the realization that… And I realized this 5 years ago. Sgt. Schlock is an iconic character. He's a character who doesn't get much of an arc. If you look at who he is in book 8 versus who he is in book 10, book 2, he's always just kind of got a 4 point moral compass. Kill it, eat it, talk to it, take a bath in it. Those are what he does. In book 13, I killed him. And brought back a clone that had lost 4 days. A lot of people were kind of shocked at that. "Oh, my gosh, you've upended your whole story, how does… this changes the whole dynamic of… How can you kill characters?" What I was setting up was something that I really wanted to do in book 16, which was Schlock growing a conscience. Where he is in a prison cell and is actually mourning over having killed people. Because he's killed a lot of people. It set up one of my very favorite scenes, which a lot of people have emailed me about, and said, "Wow, I was not expecting this amount of power in a story." It was the concept that a soldier's sacrifice is not dying, a soldier's sacrifice is killing so that other people don't have to. Because killing hurts. I couldn't tell that with any of the characters other than Schlock because it would ring too heavy. With him, I sort of trick people into thinking it was jokey, and then it was heavy, anyway.
[Chuckles]
[Howard] But that… That was incredibly pushy, and I remember one of the… Actually, a neighbor kid came over and asked me, "Why did Schlock have to grow a conscience?" I had to tell him, "It's okay. He'll kill things again someday."
[Laughter]
[Howard] Just not in the same way.
[Brandon] How did you make this decision? Like, was this early on, or…
[Howard] No, it was about… It would have been… During book 15, maybe book… Actually, during book 12, Force Multiplication, where I realized he's just… Whoever he's with, he is the commanding officer's… He is their sociopath. They know… I mean, he's an alien, and his alien mentality is kind of sociopathic, but not in the way that human doctors would describe it. I wanted to move away from that. How do you move away from that? Well, you make him feel bad about things he's done. How do I make that happen? I spent several years thinking about it, on and off. It's not like I was sitting there staring at the wall. But, when it happened, one of the things that I had to do, and this is one of the reasons it was so challenging, I can't just go back. I can't just have Schlock be all excited about going into combat and killing things. I have to have… There has to be… There's a governor on that now. There's a temper. There is a gauge, and it's a little bit different. I have to keep track of that.
[Brandon] Dan, with your character, Marcy, how did you do it? There, first person there is from John's viewpoint. How did you say I'm going to take this character and like, what were the steps that you took?
[Dan] The first big step is in book 2, where John goes to a high school event with Brooke, one of the other characters. That is the first time he really sees Marcy through the lens of somebody else's experience. He's… She's not just the girl he stares at, she's an actual person. She carries on conversations, and she has things that she likes, and things that she doesn't like. Kind of the very simple conceit of let them talk about the town. Some of the girls love living in this little town, some of them hate it. Some of them want to escape it. So showing 3 or 4 opinions all about the same thing is a nice shorthand to say, "Look. She's an individual. She's a person that stands out from everybody else." So, starting there and then building into book 3 when I just made her a main character and kind of built everything around her…
[Mary] I think one of the other things that I saw you doing as well is that she had interests that were not connected to the plot. You let us see them as glimpses… And her relationship with her family as well. A lot of times, when there's a character in this role of the super hot girl, which is a problem character a lot of times… The love interest to doesn't exist except as a trophy. They don't exist except in that role. They don't appear to have an arc of their own. Which, you set her up to have an arc of her own, and then brutally murdered her. Which is…
[Dan] Spoiler warning! Yes.
[Mary] The book's been out long enough.
[Dan] I know, I know. One of the things I did specifically with her in book 3, because I knew I had set her up in that problematic space of she's just the hot trophy. So I immediately tried to undercut that with giving her… What's the right word? One of her hobbies is shopping, because she's trying to get a good deal. That takes the specific aspect of her appearance and then re-contextualizes into this completely other thing. She's not trying to just look good for the sake of looking good. She just likes finding great deals on clothes. That's what's more important to her.
 
[Brandon] All right. We're going to have some homework, which I think is one of the most amusing pieces of homework we've come up with. Howard, you're going to tell us about this.
[Howard] Okay. Take your very favorite character that you have created. Hopefully, something in a current work in progress, because it might be more useful to do this in that context. But someone who is just interesting and dynamic and works well for your story. Take that character and write a couple of scenes in which you absolutely break them. Make them boring, make them non-proactive. Make them stale, make them cliché. Wreck them. Do everything wrong. Yeah. Just wreck them. I mean, you don't need to actually kill them. Because we'll talk about that later.
[Brandon] The point of this being that sometimes in order to diagnose problems, you need to break them down into their compliments, and see what your natural instinct will be when you're making someone boring, so you can better recognize it later. I'm really curious to see if this works for you guys, so post on the forums and let us know. All right. This has been Writing Excuses, you're out of excuses, now go write.
 
mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 13-4: Protagonists Who Aren't Sympathetic

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2018/01/28/13-4-protagonists-who-arent-sympathetic/

Key points: Non-sympathetic protagonists, aka antiheroes, come in two flavors, classic and pop! Classic or literary antiheroes don't protag. They don't move the story along, even though they are where a protagonist should be. Pop is an evil person who still does good. Why write an unlikable character? Well, one reason is a reverse character arc, where the character goes down, then redeems himself and comes back up. It does make readers uncomfortable! Sometimes it's a signal that the character is becoming an antagonist. Sometimes we do it to mimic reality -- some people aren't very likable! To make it work, hang a lantern on it, give the reader subtle hints that it is okay to dislike this character. Modern antiheroes? The Punisher, or other bad guys with a heart of gold. We like them because we wish we could forget the limits and just do it. Hulk smash! Also, the pop culture antihero has dramatic tension -- they aren't likable, but they are proactive and competent. Built-in tension! Or maybe they are likable and proactive, but not competent. Again, built-in tension. You may not like them, but when the aliens show up, they are the hero you need.
Motorcycle jackets and long hair... )

[Brandon] All right. Let's wrap this one up. I have some homework for you. I want you to take a slightly different spin on this. I want you to write a protagonist or a hero that the reader is supposed to like and does like. Right? You're going to make them likable. But you're going to try to create dramatic tension by having them… By having the reader not want this protagonist to succeed. So, generally, the reader's going to have information that the protagonist doesn't, or they're going to see things more clearly than the protagonist does. So you want the hero to fail. He or she is trying something, and you like them, but you still want them to not succeed. See if you can do that. It's very difficult. It's an interesting thought experiment. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 11.24: Stakes!

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2016/06/12/11-24-stakes/

Key Points: Raise the stakes does not mean make it more world shattering. What are stakes? Things that keep your characters from walking away from conflicts. What keeps people fighting when they have conflicting goals? What is important enough to keep them in the game? Often, the difference between a hero and a villian is the magnitude and type of stakes they are fighting over. To raise the stakes, don't add more villians or explosions, make it more personal for the main character. The destruction of the galaxy? Who cares? Saving the life of a friend? We're with y'a! Make it personal, and make the audience care. Get into the character's head and show us why it matters, what motivates them. Be aware, we can empathize with a villian, or with thieves in a heist. Consider likability, competency, and proactivity! Build engagement with character sliders. Don't forget selflessness and sacrifice as ways to build empathy. The Cornwell trick? Establish two sets of stakes, put them in conflict, and let the main character sacrifice personal gain for greater good. Revenge stories and other selfish tales often use the B plot to get readers engaged. Or proactivity, especially with something that just won't quit getting in the way.

Rare? Medium well? No, no, stake him... )

[Brandon] All right. Let's go ahead and do a writing prompt. Mary, you have a writing prompt for us.
[Mary] Yeah. So I've been doing this thing where I write a story in 15 minutes for charity. I start it based on three things. An object, a character, and a genre. So. Listener. Look to your left. That is your object.
[Chuckles]
[Mary] Look at the bookshelf. The first book you see, that is your genre. And your character is your best friend. Now write a story for 15 minutes.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
7891011 1213
14151617 181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 06:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios