mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker

Writing Excuses 21.21: Rhythm and Words


From https://writingexcuses.com/21-21-rhythm-and-words


Key Points: Rhythm, a form of sequencing. Accidental couplets! Negative space. Blocks of text. Put the reader on a horse. Iamb. Spondee. Trochee. Read your work out loud. Internal rhymes. Swearing.


[Season 21, Episode 21]


[Mary Robinette] This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons, and friends. If you would like to learn how to support this podcast, visit www.patreon.com/writingexcuses.


[Season 21, Episode 21]


[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses.

[DongWon] Rhythm and words.

[Erin] Tools, not rules.

[Howard] For writers, by writers.

[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.

[DongWon] I'm DongWon.

[Erin] I'm Erin.

[Howard] And I'm Howard.


[Erin] Today, we're going to kind of continue our conversation from last week about sequencing, where we got kind of micro at the end by talking about rhythm, which is a form of sequencing, honestly. And as somebody who loves music, I love thinking about sequence, like, how rhythm works and how rhythm creates, like, a sense of movement through a piece. And, I'm curious, like, how much... I think a lot about the rhythm of sentences. Like, obsessively so. I will change words over and over and over again to get the right emphasis, to find a word that is, like, this means big, but I also want a three syllable word with the emphasis on the second syllable so that the way that I rhythmically wrote it is the way that other people read it. So my question to you is, am I just controlling or do other people do this too?

[DongWon] No, I think you're absolutely spot on to be paying attention to that, interested in that. I think a real failure state of people who are trying to write elevated prose quote unquote is they reach for the bigger, more complicated, more flowery language. Right? They make it a language thing versus... Or a descriptive thing. They're just going to go all in on talking about the architectural details of this mansion or whatever it is, when one of the main ways to grab your reader and make something feel really beautiful, make... Put us in an emotional state where we really appreciate the thing is to use musicality and rhythm. Right? Is to use breaths and pauses and word length to pull us through and give us something that feels beautiful.

[Howard] I think a lot about the rhythm, and I also think a lot about the syllable sounds. And when you're reading silently to yourself, I suppose it could be argued that there's no noise. But those syllables still have... They still have sounds. You can have a jumping marsupial or you can have a kangaroo. And kangaroo is... The K and the G just kind of make it a funny word. In the same way that jackalope is kind of a funny word. I don't know why. I just know that when I am looking for... When I'm looking for the right rhythm to make a point, I'm also looking for the right sounds to go with that rhythm in order to make the point even better.

[Mary Robinette] I also think about it, as well. I... Going back to what you were saying, I think the... As you said, a lot of people think more is better, and it's not always. Partly it's coming out of puppetry and art, but I think about the negative spaces. There is a thing with puppets where we have a zero position, the spot that they return to. And then the movement comes out from that spot. So I tend to think about that a little bit on the page, about what is the zero position or the resting state of this prose, the natural sentence length for this thing. And then, using my repetition... Not my repetition, my rhythm to break from that. So I'll go into a sentence that's much longer than that for one type of emphasis, or a sentence that's much shorter, or a paragraph that's much shorter. And, likewise, Erin, I also will massage the words so that the stress falls into the right spot. In part because, when I'm narrating, I'm sometimes narrating other people's stuff and they have accidental couplets in their fiction. And I... It's like trying to fix that as a narrator is so hard, and it's drawing attention off into things that you just don't want attention drawn to. Just 100% an accident.

[Howard] One of...

[Erin] Accidental couplets in their fiction?

[Mary Robinette] Oh, my goodness.

[Erin] That causes friction.

[choke]

[DongWon] Good Lord.

[laughter]

[Howard] Anybody want a peanut?


[DongWon] One thing I think about a lot when it comes to this as well is negative space. Right? There's this Japanese concept of ma, which is sort of the space around the thing, or considering the negative space as its own thing that should be considered and has value and weight in a scene. And this can be applied in a number of ways, both in terms of, like, thinking about what you're not describing, think about where the breaths are in your sentences. And then, literally think about how it works on the page. Right? One thing I see a lot is really dense blocks of text. If you have, like, an entire paragraph that's just dense description with no line breaks, with no paragraph breaks, it's very hard to ingest. Right? My... One of my deep interests in my sort of academic background is in British modernism. It's like one of my favorite periods in literature. I'm endlessly fascinated with the modernists. They... One of the things they did was start to play with that negative space in very deliberate ways. You'll have... I mean, Ulysses famous... Or James Joyce famously, in his books, will have entire pages that are just one sentence with no breaks, which was designed to create a very deliberate emotional effect in the reader, which is one that is a state of complete overwhelm and being subsumed in the interior monologue of a character. Because there are no breaths in it, it is incredibly difficult to read, and overwhelming to try and process what he is talking about. Because there's no space for breaths in it. Right? And so, when you think about how to use that negative space, when you think about sort of, like, poets who started to break traditional line structure, and sort of give that blank space for half of a line, or breaking in the middle of a word, those kinds of things, you'll start to sort of see the potential of using the physicality of the page, using those points where you can take a breath as active things that you are including in your fiction.


[Mary Robinette] I'm glad that you talked about the visual aspect of the negative space on the page, because even if you're not doing poetry or you're not doing something that's experimental, you can still sort of get a sense of the rhythm of your piece by just backing the view away.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] Like, you can set up your word processor so that you can see multiple pages all at once. And if you look at it, and there's, like, a... There's a certain sameness to it, to your paragraphs, then you're using the same rhythm over and over again. There are times that's actually 100% appropriate. But, as we've talked about with other forms of pacing, when you're rhythmically all the same, it can become fatiguing without anyone knowing why it is fatiguing.

[DongWon] A very simple example. It makes me insane when somebody sends me jacket copy that is one big paragraph. Right? Or if you're writing a query letter... Here's my biggest query letter pitch, or my pitch sort of note for you. Right? Simple tip. Make sure no paragraph is longer than three sentences. Make sure each paragraph is short and to the point, and give me negative space so that I can read it quickly and process it quickly. If you give me one long paragraph, it's so hard to process it when you're trying to go fast, as one is when reading jacket copy, when reading a pitch.

[Mary Robinette] And I'm just going to flag that this is definitely a tool for submitting to a specific agent...

[laughter]

[Mary Robinette] And that other agents may have different preferences.

[DongWon] Always. They are wrong...

[laughter]

[DongWon] And they should feel bad about it.

[laughter]


[Howard] There is... There are circumstances in which the words that you put on the page, you have 100% control over the way they flow, where the line feeds are, where the breaks are. The most common case of this is squarely in my wheelhouse, and that's in comics. A comic dialogue bubble... I find that most of the skills that I have for wordsmithing something, for massaging the text, grew out of necessity, because when I'm trying to put things in the bubble, I want to be able to break the words so that they will easily form an ellipse, they'll be contained by an ellipse, or be... If they're up in a corner, that they will be kind of an elliptical shape on one edge and a corner shape on the other. And that there won't be rivers and valleys, the spaces between the words. You won't have a stack of O's, or E's, or I's right on top of each other. And this seems like a really silly thing for a writer to need to think about. But there are definitely circumstances in which you realize that what you've written won't work, because the way it is being printed on the page, it is full of rivers and valleys and stacked letters. Which creates a distraction, and it will no longer be read the way it would be spoken if you didn't see it on the page.

[Erin] I find it really interesting that we've been talking about these, like, blocks and blocks of text on the page, because I recently went to a writing group, and somebody noted that one of my sentences was 87 words long.

[DongWon] Oh, yeah, let's go.

[Erin] And I'm going to explain why that's totally okay, using poetry, after the break.


[Howard] The cruise ship sailing up to Alaska this summer is completely sold out, except for the cabins we'd reserved for Writing Excuses attendees. These cabins are only available until June 4th. On June 4th, any cabins not reserved by Writing Excuses attendees will revert to the cruise line, and will be sold to the general public. If you want to join the Writing Excuses hosts and 100 new friends on our final annual cruise as we read, write, critique, and learn while reveling in the stunning scenery, visit writingexcuses.com/retreats. Don't delay. We're holding the very last unreserved cabins on the entire ship, and they will not stay unreserved for very long. Again, that's writingexcuses.com/retreats.


[Mary Robinette] One of the challenges of writing is finding a subject matter expert, right? Particularly when you are still in the early part of your career. So, I'm going to give you a hack. Masterclass. For instance, Chris Hatfield's course on space exploration feels very much like sitting down across from him. And I've met him. His class covers training, Mars In situ resource management, what it's like to launch. It's pretty great. I was also reassured to hear him talk about his first day in the office as an astronaut candidate, AKA as-can, because he had imposter syndrome too. So, it's not something that just hits writers, apparently it hits astronauts. And one of the great things about Masterclass is that it fits into real life. Audio mode, short lessons on your phone or TV. You don't have to carve out hours. You just have to start. Unlike other learning platforms, Masterclass puts you in the room with the people who define their fields. Not just experts, but the best in the world. They have 200 plus classes across 13 categories. Business, writing, cooking, creativity, wellness, and more. With plans starting at just $10 a month billed annually, it really does fit into any schedule. Audio mode turns your commute or workout into a classroom. Download lessons for offline access. Learn on your terms. And it actually works. Three oj four members feel inspired every time they watch. 83% have applied something they've learned to their real lives. It's no risk. Every new membership comes with a 30-day money back guarantee. So if you're trying to research something and don't know a subject matter expert to reach out to, you can always take a class. Masterclass keeps adding new classes, so there's never been a better time to get in. Right now, as a listener of this show, you get at least 15% off any yearly membership at masterclass.com/excuses. That's 15% off at masterclass.com/excuses. Go learn about space from Chris Hadfield or apply the principles of improv to your life with Amy Poehler. Go to masterclass.com/excuses to see the latest offer.


[Erin] As promised, one of the reasons that I love rhythm is that I love long blocks of sentences. I want to beat you over the head with large blocks, and large blocks on the page.

[Chuckles]

[Erin] And so, one of the ways that I do this...

[DongWon] Once again, I feel like I need to not be sitting next to Erin anymore. I feel very stressed.

[Chuckles]

[Erin] Yes. [garbled] And one of the ways I do this is if you can create a rhythm in the way in which somebody will read something... This is why I think so much about stress, it's sort of... You don't notice it. It's sort of the way that, like... I feel like sometimes I'm just putting my reader on a horse and then just like hitting the horse in the butt. Is that how you get horses to go?

[DongWon] Yes.

[Erin] And then sometimes it's like... And they're just galloping off. And when you're galloping on a horse, something I haven't done since I was three, but I'm going to assume there's some sort of rhythm.

[Mary Robinette] Why were you galloping on a horse when you were three?

[DongWon] Three is so young to be galloping on a horse. [garbled]

[Erin] Anyway...

[Mary Robinette] That's true.

[Erin] But anyway, so what you are doing is, the horse has some sort of rhythm and it's just carrying you along.

[DongWon] Yep.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[Erin] I want my story to be your horse.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.


[Erin] That sounds weird. And so I like to think about it, like, some of the things that poets use. Which are like the actual, like, if you ever talk to poets, they will explain, like, this is in, like, trochaic foot...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Or iambic pentameter, or all of these other things, and I'm going to share with you some of my favorites, because I want to...

[okay]

[Erin] Okay, so iamb. Iamb's from Shakespeare. That's dahdum, dahdum, dahdum, which is... My favorite two examples of this are, but soft what light through yonder window breaks, but also, thank God Almighty, we are free at last. And I think there's something about them... I don't know, somebody tell me if you think this is true. That, like, makes you feel... There's something about them that is a lean in. Because the emphasis is on the second syllable, and because it's a double, which is like, a lot of, like, just like a horse. Dadum, dadum. There's a lot of feeling like you're leaning in to what the other person is saying, and you need to understand what's going on. And so it makes sense when you're speaking to Juliet on her balcony or trying to convince a large number of people, as the second example, like, that this is... Like we have made it to the promised land. Preachers love a good iamb... And preachers love rhythm in general. If you want a good example of rhythm, listen to a Southern Baptist preacher.

[DongWon] Oh, my God.

[Erin] They are great at it. Like, they will take everything and make it sound rhythmic. They'll be like, I went, to the grocery store. And you're like, oh, my gosh.

[DongWon] I mean...

[Erin] This is amazing.

[DongWon] Rap and hip hop as well. Old school boom bap. That's an iamb. Right?

[Erin] Yeah.

[DongWon] Yeah.


[Erin] Speaking of, actually... I'm going to skip ahead to a spondee, which is where both have the same. So, as opposed to emphasis being on the front, which I'll get back to, or emphasis being on the back, it's like everything is the same. It's paired, but it's like there's no emphasis one way or the other. And my favorite example of this is, that butt was stuffed.

[laughter]

[Erin] [garbled] because he's doing all this other rhythm, but then he stops and he uses equal emphasis because all of those words are important.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] And also because it draws attention, much like the butt does to Sir Mix-a-Lot to that section of the rhythm.

[DongWon] And it brings it to a screeching halt in that moment, and we have to take a beat to process it, and then it picks up again. Right? [garbled]

[Erin] Exactly.

[Mary Robinette] As opposed to if it had all been straight emphasis all the way through.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] You would have not... Who would have cared?

[Erin] Yeah.

[DongWon] Who would have noticed that butt?

[Howard] Stuffed or unstuffed.

[Erin] Wow.

[laughter]

[Erin] I'm sorry. I've taken us off the... We're on a horse now.

[Howard] This epo... Are we in Mississippi or is the horse named Mississippi?

[Erin] I'm so glad...

[DongWon] We've been from James Joyce to Sir Mix-a-Lot, and I'm delighted. Yeah.


[Erin] And then, the other one, the last sort of, like, doublet that I really like is the one where your emphasis is first. So, datum, datum, datum. This is the Poe.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered weak and weary...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] And so it's also used... Taylor Swift, was it? Like to meet you, where you been...

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] I feel like there's a lot...  Taylor Swift often uses those things because I think it... I don't know, it makes it pop more.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] It's in your face a little more, and it feels a little more... I don't know...

[Howard] Like the trochaic tetrometers of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Is that the same?

[Ooh!]

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] I like that. It is...

[Howard] Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble... Where the accent is first.

[Mary Robinette] Double Trouble.

[Howard] Double, double... Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] I mean, Double Bubble, I guess, if you're doing...

[Howard] Double bubble chewing gum.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah.

[DongWon] Yeah.


[Mary Robinette] But Shakespeare, there was a... There's a great TV show called Slings and Arrows. I think they only had three seasons, and it's following a theater company. But, in one of the episodes, they're doing Lear, and this older Shakespearean actor is railing at one of the younger actors who is trying to ignore the meter. And he's like, no, the meter tells you where it is important. It's... Shakespeare would put the emphasis on the important words, and... But soft, but is not important, but soft, what light... And that is kind of an interesting thing when you're thinking about your own prose, where do you want to throw the emphasis, and when do you want to break that rhythm to draw people's attention to it?

[DongWon] Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow... It's... Are the and's important or is the tomorrow important? Right? And how you read this, standing on that, changes the meaning of the lines wildly. Right?

[Mary Robinette] There's also really fantastic hilarious thing where diff... Where there's an actor who's attempting to do Hamlet, and different things, people who have played Hamlet, come out and give him a, like, read on, to be or not to be, and each of them takes a different word to emphasize, which changes the meaning. And that's something that's very easy to do in spoken word, but on the page, when you're playing with rhythm, not only are you looking at these beats, but you're also looking at italics as a tool that you can use or wildly misuse.

[DongWon] It is worth sitting down with a breakdown of a [Ken Meyer? Garbled] song and just see how he uses rhythm to shift your attention and your emotional state when he moves from doubles to triplets, when he moves back. Like, the number... The complexity of what he's doing with rhythm. Same with M&M. If you go and look at the complete breakdown of how they're using rhythm, when they're using twos, when they're using threes, things like that, can be so useful for understanding the musicality of prose. Right? Once you... I mean, it sounds like we're getting... We're talking Shakespeare, we're talking literature. we're talking music, like, all these different things that may feel far from trying to write contemporary science fiction or fantasy prose, but I promise you that the more you internalize these tools, the more you can apply them unconsciously in moments where you need that [garbled]

[Howard] Knowing the names of them, knowing that a trochee is double, accent unaccent. That a spondee is all the same, that an iamb is unaccented accented. Just having words for it means that when you are troubleshooting what you are writing, you have names for the problem you're trying to solve, and you can sort things out in your head more quickly.

[DongWon] I will say your mileage may vary on that.

[Erin] Yeah. Yeah.

[DongWon] For me... I struggled when I was being formally taught poetry, because I had to learn all the names of things. Once I learned to sit and appreciate poetry, then I had a very different relationship to the rhythms of it and... But for a lot of people, learning the structure and the names will be very helpful.

[Mary Robinette] And you don't have to, either, because again, most of this is stuff that we have actually internalized...

[DongWon] Yeah.


[Mary Robinette] And then reverse engineered to come up with names for. But the simplest thing you can do to check the rhythm is to read your work out loud.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Mary Robinette] And if reading your workout loud is not something that works for you, have a machine read it out loud, because if it is possible for that machine to get it wrong, and it is, it will do it.

[DongWon] Right.

[Mary Robinette] So, reading out loud is a very, very useful way... That's where you will stop [garbled] oh, I do have an accidental couplet here, or I've... Like, internal rhymes can be really... We didn't talk about this much, but internal rhymes can be a really. really powerful tool, but you can also, like, completely break things by... I'm constantly accidentally writing, she rose on her toes. I'm like, oh...

[Chuckles]

[Mary Robinette] It's like drawing attention to something that I...

[Howard] As long as she doesn't do anything with her nose at the same time.


[DongWon] I think one thing that's also really useful to think about is think about cussing. Like, where... Basically, swearing is all about rhythm.

[laughter]

[DongWon] Like, where you're putting the cusses in your sentences, where you're putting that, or how you're sequencing and ordering them. Someone who's bad at it is always putting them at a wrong place and you can feel it. And there's no impact to it. When you get someone who's like phenomenal at swearing... This is why Shakespeare swearing is the best thing in the world. Because when you can just, like, get the rhythm of it. Right? It's so dependent on that. It's... Swearing is so dependent on the musicality of the words that we choose. And that's why certain swear words are just more fun than other ones.

[Mary Robinette] Thou art a knave, a rascal, an eater of broken meats, a base, proud, shallow, beggarly, three suited, hundred pound, filthy, worsted-stocking knave. A lily livered, action-taking knave, a whoreson, glass-gazing, super-serviceable finical rogue, one that I will beat into clamorous whining, if thou denies the least syllable of thy addition.

[DongWon] You can say that one more time.

[Mary Robinette] That's...[garbled]

[Erin] [garbled] your face.

[Mary Robinette] Yeah, I know. King Lear. Yeah. Yeah. I'm not surprised, I don't think. King Lear, Act 2, scene 2. Kent to Oswald, and I have it a little bit wrong, but it's pretty close.

[Erin] I will say that... Before we head to the homework or start insulting each other...

[Chuckles]

[Erin] That I also like, in addition to looking at hip hop, looking at covers.

[DongWon] Yeah.

[Erin] We see an artist, like a really well-known song, like, 10,000 people have done this same jazz song. One way to distinguish it is by playing with the rhythm. If you ever have a song and you're like, wow, this new interpretation made me think about the meaning of the song differently, because the emphasis is in a different place, you are actually seeing what is happening when rhythm is tweaked in real time. And so, with that, I'm going to take us to the homework.


[Erin] And your homework for this is to listen to a piece of music that you really like, and think about how does the rhythm work within that. Are they emphasizing the first word or the second word? Does it get faster and then slower? You can use really official terms and be very poetry class, or you can just be like, fast here, many words, yay. And then I want you to take a piece of your writing and see what happens if you use that same rhythmic structure in your own piece, and how it changes, like, a piece of description that you have in your own writing


[Mary Robinette] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

 
mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 19.11: A Close Reading on Voice -- An Overview and Why Time War
 
 
Key Points: Voice in fiction. Voice, mechanical, aesthetic, and personal. Tools for voice on the page: pacing, accent, attitude, and experience. Pacing is cadence or rhythm, pauses, punctuation. Accent is word choice and sentence structure. Attitude is attitude. Experience is how the character views the world. Aiming to give you tools so that you say, "Oh, I can do that." 
 
[Season 19, Episode 11]
 
[Mary Robinette] This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons, and friends. If you would like to learn how to support this podcast, visit www.patreon.com/writingexcuses.
 
[Season 19, Episode 11]
 
[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses.
[DongWon] A Close Reading on Voice -- An Overview and Why We Chose Time War
[Mary Robinette] 15 minutes long.
[Erin] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.
[DongWon] I'm DongWon.
[Erin] I'm Erin.
[Howard] And I'm Howard.
 
[DongWon] So, this episode is the first of our close reading series. I'm very excited to dig into this one. We've chosen for our first module here to focus on the aspect of voice in fiction. We thought what better book for that than Max Gladstone and Amal El-Mohtar's This Is How You Lose The Time War. This was a novella that was published in 2015 that features two alternative voices from two different POVs and [garbled] as letters written between them. It won a bunch of awards. It's been very popular. I think the voice in this book is very distinct and very powerful and much of the charm of the book is in how these two different writers are approaching these characters and how the voice is carrying through.
[Howard] There's also the elephant in the room which is when I got this book out to reread it and showed it to my 22-year-old and told them, "I think you might like this book a lot," they said, "Yes. Bigolas Dickolas said the same thing."
[Ha]
[Howard] "I will get to it eventually." They will get to it eventually because I'm going to bring this copy back and shove it in front of them. Yes, this book got huge props… Was it 21, 22?
[DongWon] It was the… Oh my gosh… What, 23?
[Howard] I do not remember.
[DongWon] Summer 23.
[Mary Robinette] 23. Summer of 23.
[Howard] This is… I mean, we're recording this in fall of… Or in December of 23. So…
[DongWon] It was this summer.
[Howard] It was this year.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. It won all of the awards when it came out, and then it was rediscovered by Bigolas Dickolas, and now is a phenomenon sweeping the globe.
[DongWon] Yes.
[Howard] Part of the reason it's doing that is that the voice is so strong and so… It speaks to a lot of people. I think voice is the reason it does that.
 
[Mary Robinette] So, I want to just put something out, that is we're talking about voice, that the voice of this is one of the things that is so important. But voice is also one of those wiggly words that we use a lot. I find that it tends to mean 3 different things. There is the mechanical voice, which is, like, the style. First person, 3rd person, the mechanics of it. There is the aesthetic voice, what it sounds like. Then there's the personal voice, which is what the author brings to it. We are primarily going to be focusing on the aesthetic and mechanical voices when we're talking about this. In part because we don't know which parts which author wrote, so it's harder to pin down and say this is because of their life experience.
[DongWon] They have said who wrote which part.
[Mary Robinette] Oh, they have now?
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] For a long time, they refused to.
[DongWon] Yeah. Oh, I'm pretty sure that's public. So I have the other elephant in the room is that I have a particularly inside perspective on this book, because the first 2 books we've chosen, I swear to God, I did not do this on purpose, I did not suggest these, are both books that I have worked on is a literary agent. So, Max and Amal are both my clients and I have worked on Time War since its inception. So I have a little bit of inside perspective and sometimes filtering out what is public and what is not is a trick for me.
[Howard] Drop the knowledge, DongWon.
[Laughter]
[DongWon] But I will very gladly give a few peeks behind the curtain when I can.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. Double check them on that one.
[DongWon] I will.
 
[Mary Robinette] So, the… For me, one of the things that struck me immediately the first time I started reading this was that there was a poetic denseness to the language that you see less often in science fiction. It's… I can think of other examples, but the poetic denseness was one of the things that pulled me in, and also, slowed me down. Because I felt like I needed to savor the book as I was going through, that the language, the voice itself was as important as the plot. That it was inextricably tied together.
[Erin] Yeah. I think some of that is the form of the book itself. Because so much of it is epistolary, it's in letters, I think that there's a certain indulgence in some ways that, as readers, we give to a letter. We sort of assume that it will be like… That you're going to lean into maybe the poetry of things when you're writing a letter to another person and what… I think it was such a smart idea, because while in like non-letter prose, you might be like, oh, this is a lot, in a letter you're like, oh, no, this completely makes sense, because it's such an expression, such a personal expression, and therefore a way in which a voice can come out so cleanly and clearly.
[Mary Robinette] Interesting, because I actually have the opposite experience when reading, which is that the letters are the more straightforward prose than the 3rd person passages.
[Erin] Interesting.
[Mary Robinette] Isn't it interesting?
 
[Howard] An example. The piece… There are 2 pieces that hooked me on the first page. The first piece, 2nd line and beginning of the 3rd paragraph, "Blood slicks her hair. She breathes out steam in the last night of this dying world. This was fun, she thinks."
[Chuckles]
[Howard] Okay. I'm on board.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Howard] I'm on board. Then, paragraph 4, this is where the prose gets dense and does a whole bunch of worldbuilding for us. "She holds a corpse that was once a man. Her hands gloved in its guts, her fingers clutching its alloy spine. She let's go, and the exoskeleton clatters against rock. Crude technology. Ancient. Bronzed depleted uranium. He never had a chance. That is the point of Red." Okay. You've thrown a bunch of cool technical terms at me, and I'm like, "Oh, wow, future battlefield… Wait. Crude technology. Wait. What?"
[Mary Robinette, DongWon] Yeah.
[Howard] Now I have… That's the 2nd hook.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Howard] The first hook is, "[gasp] That was fun." The 2nd hook is how advanced is this? Please world build some more for me.
[Mary Robinette] Right. I think that that was part of what I'm thinking about… And we're going to dive into this way more in the next episode, when we're talking about… Like, we're going to do really close reading about Red's perspective, looking at these first pages. But, in general, one of the things that Amal and Max are trying to do in this book is describe this time war which is technology that we don't have and an understanding of time that we don't have. So they are using this metaphor poetic language to attempt to communicate something to us because we don't have the language for it. So that juxtaposition of those 2 things, of, like, this is a very highly technical thing I'm going to attempt to explain to you people who are locked into this single timeline… It makes things really juicy and lovely.
 
[DongWon] Yeah. I mean, it's one of the main reasons I wanted to pick this. I wanted to pick it both because I deeply love the voice of this book, I find it very affecting and very sort of pleasurable to engage with. But then, there are really almost 4 different voices in this book. Because you have the Red sections, you have the Blue sections, you have Red letters and Blue letters. Each of them has a distinctly different voice that is communicating different information and different worldbuilding as we go. So one of the reasons I wanted to examine this one is we get to sort of do that contrast between, okay, what's happening here versus what's happening here versus what's happening here. So it felt very useful as a teaching tool in addition to one that is just, oh, they are executing this at a very high level and is delightful to engage with.
[Howard] Yeah. Let me circle back on that teaching tool briefly. You can pick up to similar books by different authors…
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Howard] And compare voices and ask yourself, why do these sound different? Why do these feel different? Why do these work differently? That's valuable. Having that experience in one book where the same narrative, a singular narrative is being run in multiple voices is utterly invaluable. There's… I cannot think of a better teaching tool for voice then reading and rereading and analyzing your own experience as you pick up the book again and again than this book.
[Erin] While this book is… Has a very sort of unique style, it's also something that you can do in books with multiple POVs. So if you wanted to take what we're doing in this close reading and apply it somewhere else, you could take a book that has a lot of different points of view and think about how is the voice being done differently by the author from one character to the next.
[DongWon] Yeah. I mean, this is just an extreme case, which I think is what makes it so useful. Right? Of having such distinctly different voices, and it's such a voice-y book. What I mean by that is there just leaning so much into that voice as a forward component of it. Which, in part, they get away with because it's a shorter book. Right? It doesn't overstay its welcome. This might be more difficult to do at great length. But, given the compactness of the book and how quick the experience of reading it is, you can really push pretty hard on the voice lever. Which they've done in this case.
[Howard] I have a question that I'm going to pose after our break.
 
[DongWon] I want to talk to y'all about Scavengers Reign. Which is one of the best things I saw in 2023. It's an animated series on Max that tells the story of a group of survivors crash landed on an alien planet after their colony ship malfunctions mid journey. What makes the show wonderful is its incredible art style, but also its approach to how they portray alien life and how humans interact with it. It's really deeply interested in systems and ecologies, and tells a really beautiful story about how humans interact with their environment and with each other. I really can't recommend it highly enough.
 
[Howard] The big question is if you are but one author, but one mortal author…
[Chuckles]
[Howard] Trying to write multiple voices, as you said, a novel with multiple POVs. Can you do it this well?
[DongWon] Yeah. Well, one thing I want to point out as we go into this close reading series is we're picking these as examples we hope are instructive. We're not saying you have to do what these authors are doing or replicate these. We're picking examples that are really pushing the boundaries of what is possible in this particular severe. So, this is pushing the boundaries of voice. When we get to Memory Called Empire, that is pushing the boundaries of what you can do with worldbuilding. When we get to Fifth Season, that's going to be pushing the boundaries of what you can do with structure. I do not recommend trying to replicate these things. We're showing you big examples so you can take lessons from them and learn from them.
 
[Mary Robinette] So, I'm going to give you a couple of words that we're going to be using as we're going through. As you probably know, I am an audiobook narrator, and when I'm trying to learn how to do character voice, when I'm teaching it, there's a couple of tools that we use that are very useful for doing voice on the page. So, pacing, accent, attitude, and what I call experience. So, pacing is kind of the cadence, the rhythm of the voice. Where they pause, whether they're doing long sentences or short sentences. Where they put the punctuation. That's something that you manipulate really by punctuation. It's replicating the way we pause in speech. Accent is all about word choice and sentence structure. It's not about pronunciation, which is what a lot of people focus on. So you'll hear us talking about the word choice and sentence structures that are specific to each character. Then, attitude is exactly what it sounds like. When you're talking to someone on the phone, and I know that a lot of people never do that anymore, but you can tell… Well, when you're listening to us, you can tell if we're smiling or not smiling. Mechanically, that's because the shape of our facial mask changes. But really it's that our attitude is driving the way that everything happens. On the page, you're manipulating that with word choice, sentence structure, and punctuation. Then, experience is about what… How the character views the world. So, specifically, when you're hearing us talk about Red and Blue, you're going to hear us talking about the use of botanical metaphors versus the use of mechanical metaphors, depending on which character we're talking about. That comes from their experience. So those are a couple of levers that you can push very consciously without having to, like, have this extensive acting career or, in Amal's case, Amal is a poet and is using a lot of additional tools. But these are 4 things that I find very useful.
 
[Howard] In… Oh, gosh, this would have been 40 years ago. I was reading the liner notes… Liner notes? Must have been, on a Billie Joel album. Billie Joel talked about getting his start. He said, "I listen to things on the radio and I told myself I can do that." That… I wanted to be a rock star for years. Then I got into cartooning and into writing because I looked at things and said I can do that. I look at Time War and think I can't do that.
[Laughter]
[Howard] If you are feeling the same thing, I just wanted to express some camaraderie, a little bit of commiseration, and a little bit of hopefulness, which is that as we go through these, we want to give you the tools so that on your 3rd or 4th reread of one of these close reads, you begin to tell yourself, "Oh. Oh, I can do that."
[Mary Robinette] It doesn't even have to be doing that entire… Like, you can't write Time War because that's where the personal voice comes in. Their own experience, the thing that drives them. But you can use the tools that they're using in Time War. That's the piece that we're hoping that you're going to get out of these really close readings, that here's this tool that you can use and apply to your own personal voice and your own experience, that that will come out on the page.
[DongWon] Well, one thing to keep in mind is also that this is 2 people. Right? This is a collaborative process. They're bringing double the firepower to this project, and anybody who's read Amal and Max's work individually knows that those are already some pretty heavy guns that they've got. So, there's something special that can happen in a collaboration where the sum is even greater than the individual parts. It's very hard to get to. I don't love a collaboration project, actually. It's one of the grand ironies of this book, is I tend to be fairly opposed to them because they're so difficult to do well. But in this case, those 2 came together in a way that their voices really braided together in this really powerful way that leads to the reading experience that we have in front of you.
 
[Mary Robinette] So, Erin, you tend to do fairly voice-y fiction also when you're writing. What are the things that you think about when you're looking at Time War in kind of relation to the way you approach your own work?
[Erin] I think, I like the way that you broke down sort of the different stuff, pacing… I'm going to forget them all now.
[Mary Robinette] Pacing, accent, attitude, experience.
[Erin] Pacing, accent, attitude, experience. I really wanted that to be like something I could say, like PAAE. That's not really…
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. Yeah. Sorry.
[Erin] It's okay. But I think that pacing, especially… Like, I love to look at the way in which other folks use punctuation. Because, like, really as writers, I find us to be a controlling lot.
[Laughter]
[Erin] You know what I mean? We don't just want you to read it, we want you to read it how we would read it in our own homes. So thinking about, I wonder if this… If the way I'm reading this is the experience that they intended me to have. Why is… In the thing that Howard read earlier, okay, there are some shorter bits in there. There are things that are 2 word sentences. Why is this. Here, why not a dash? Why was this not a semicolon? Oh, it's because I need to stop all the way here. I like to really think about that because when I'm doing it, I know the effect that I'm going for. What I like to try to do is listen to somebody else and wonder about the effect that they are going for. It's sort of like the listening to the song on the radio and going I think this song is meant to make me sad. Why and how? Because if I'm writing a song that wants to make somebody sad, I should think about if I understand how they did it, then I can understand the way that maybe I could do it better.
 
[Mary Robinette] My… One of the arguments that I will occasionally have with copy editors who will never see the argument back, like, the book is never returned to the copy editor with my No!
[Chuckles]
[Mary Robinette] But I'll have things that are phrased like a question, but I do not have a question mark, because they are not said with a rising tone. Like, "What did you say." Like, what did you say… Like, there's a falling tone there. If you put a question mark, it's a very different, "What did you say?" That kind of thing. I see early career writers, and I know I did it myself, get hung up on the grammar and having something grammatically correct is not what you're trying to do when you write. Grammar is there for when you need to express clarity in some way. But most of the time, what you're looking for is just do these rhythms flow?
[Howard] I look at grammar as the rule set that we play by when things are complicated and we need to make sure that everything is working well. Breaking those rules is what we do when we need a new rule in order to communicate something different. So we will deliberately throw down a word like mis-underestimate which isn't a word, but which we can kind of tell what it means and away we go. The copy editor will say, "Hey, this isn't a word," and you say, "But it's my word for this book."
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] One way to think about voice is that voice is about clarity for the reader. It's about clarifying the reader's experience of all the information you're trying to give them. Right? Because it is the vessel with which that's handed over. So, sometimes, the way you achieve that clarity is by breaking grammatical rules, by using a very complicated language, or inventing your own word sometimes. Because what you're trying to do is communicate what the emotional experience that you want the reader to have is. Right? So voice is your first interface with them. It's the first… It's why we're doing this as our first module, is voice is the first and the last thing that you will encounter while reading a book.
 
[Erin] Yeah. I also think… Something else that just occurred to me, a bit of a side note, is that the other thing that I really like to look at is that… Is… Once you create voice and people understand what that voice is, you have to keep doing the work, but in some ways, you've already established who this person is. The way that they talk, the way that they think, and it actually helps to put their voice in the mind of your reader.
[DongWon, Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[Erin] Like, one of my favorite English sentences is, "I didn't say you got to keep the money." Because you can put the emphasis on every single word in that, like, I didn't say you got to keep the money. I didn't… Like, it's a different… It's a slightly different meaning. If you have the voice of the character established, they will emphasize, hopefully, the word that you would emphasize when you were writing it.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. This is very similar to what happens in audio fiction. There are character voices that I cannot sustain for an entire thing. Like the [low shack] Luidaeg in the October Daye books. I'm talking like this. I can't do that for an entire page. So I hid it really hard at the beginning, and then I back off and use it for emphasis where I want to drive home this is the [low shack] Luidaeg speaking. I find the same with… When I'm writing, that I will use those embellishments, the… Sometimes it's just as simple as italics, but sometimes it's like the flourishing words at places where I want to remove ambiguity about who's speaking or what they mean or places where I want to add emphasis. It's like, no, this is seriously this person.
 
[DongWon] Well, one last thing I wanted to point out here is another reason I think this is a great book to use is so much of the character development and plot development is communicated through alterations in voice. The voice evolves over the course of the book, and as it does, we grow with the writer. Or the characters, and our understanding of the world that they live in also evolves. Right? So we get to sort of see how you can use voice as an active tool in your fiction.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] I think people think about it as kind of a passive set thing. Right? In the first paragraph, you set your voice, and then it's the same throughout. That, ideally, is not true. It grows and changes with you. I think this again is a pretty radical example of how you do that.
[Howard] Before we jump to our homework… Isn't that what we're getting ready to do next? Before… I would like to send us home with a passage that I think fits beautifully. "I am glad to know you love reading. Perhaps you should next write from a library. There's so much I want to recommend."
[Chuckles]
[Mary Robinette] That's perfect.
 
[DongWon] That is perfect. On that note, I have our homework for you this week. So. What I would like you to do is to take a sentence from a work you love that has a strong and clear voice. So think about what are some voice-y pieces that you've read that you really enjoy. Take that sentence and write a scene based on that as a prompt in the same tone and voice as the original. So, I'm not trying to get you to replicate the original scene, but take that… Take what you love about why it sounds the way it does, and try and extend that into your own fiction and make that voice a little bit your own.
 
[Mary Robinette] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
 
[Howard] Hey, podcast lovers. Do you know that you can upgrade your experience here with our ad-free tier on Patreon? Head over to patreon.com/writingexcuses to enjoy an ad free oasis as well as access to our virtual Discord community where you can talk with your fellow writers.
 
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 12.12: Words as Words, with Linda Addison

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2017/03/19/12-12-words-as-words-with-linda-addison/

Key Points: Picking the exact right word, for the shape, sound, visual space, as an object unto itself, independent of meaning. Taste your words, feel them, find the rhythm, the breaks. "Poetry is to be read like a fine meal or a fine wine, one sip at a time." Journals! Write down anything and everything, then go back and pull out words and ideas and feelings. Write stories and turn them into poems. Write poems and create stories out of them. Take words out. Change words. Read them out loud. Create a startling image. Change hard and soft words, or sibilants and bebop. Take out the most important word, and let the reader put their own ideas, their own breath, their own emotion in there. Play with the rhythms of poetry, to learn them. Make them an unconscious rhythm that you can draw on. Poetry, like music, is organic and normal. It's the cadence of storytelling around the fire. Whether you want to write poetry or something else, pay attention to word choice, the music of words, and to words as words.

Iambic pentameter and blank poetry? )

[Dan] So, you said that you had a little writing prompt to throw at us at the end?
[Linda] Always. I mean, it may be something I end up building my life poem on today, because I haven't done it yet, but it's four words. I would suggest playing with something that starts "Driving through the tears."
[Dan] I like it. All right. So there's your writing prompt, dear listeners. You are out of excuses. Now go write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 12.2: How to Nail Character Voice in First Person

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2017/01/08/12-2-how-to-nail-character-voice-in-first-person/

Key points: A memorable first person voice? Sentence structure, rhythm and accent. Accent is word choices and phrasing, not just dialect. Use first person to showcase characters with an interesting voice, but third person is easier. Use a text-to-speech program to read your writing out loud! Snarky is easy, but show us the thought process, what's behind the face the character shows everyone. What's their attitude, their too factor? First person is good for wordplay. Think about the categories of words your character might use. Be aware that no one is snarky in their own thinking, or has an accent in their own voice.

I said,  )

[Brandon] I'm going to have to cut it here. It's a great discussion. But we do have some homework that Mary is going to give to us.
[Mary] Right. So, here's your homework. What I want you to do is I want you to write, about a page, maybe two, first person and you've got a character who is trying to accomplish something. If you don't have anything in your head, then I'm going to say that you have a baker, and the baker is attempting to deliver some bagels. Then, I want you to write it again, but this time, your main character is not a baker, and I want you to have them go through the same task. The goal of this is to see how the character's attitude and the way their lens affects the world, affects how they relay the story of this bagel delivery, or whatever it is that you want to do.
[Brandon] Excellent. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

May 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2
345678 9
1011121314 1516
17181920 212223
242526 27282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2026 08:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios