mbarker: (Fireworks Delight)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 13.42: Writing Excuses Talks to an Astronaut, with Special Guest Kjell Lindgren 
 
 
Key points: Vertigo in space, and vertigo on landing. Depends on the individual, but keep your head very still, avoid any type of acceleration. Beware the fluid shift. What about giraffes in space, doing the zero-gravity giraffe? Why play bagpipes in space? Consider expeditionary behavior. Get yourself squared away, then help your crewmates. "In that environment, we don't have the luxury of not getting along." Be aware that movement and the physics of space are different -- no hard right turns without touching anything, okay? Also, there are plenty of real risks about living in space, you don't need to inject drama. To make it real, do your research and add little details, like the right menu.
 
Giraffes in space? Whare? )
[Brandon] This is Writing Excuses, Writing Excuses Talks to an Astronaut, with Kjell Lindgren.
[Howard] 15 minutes long.
[Mary] Because you're in a hurry.
[Dan] And we're not that smart.
[Brandon] I'm Brandon.
[Howard] I'm Howard.
[Mary] I'm Mary.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Brandon] We're all out of order.
[Dan] We're not sitting in the right order.
[Brandon] We're all kind of mixed up.
[Dan] Our brains only work in a very specific order.
[Laughter]
[Dan] We're outside of mission parameters.
[Brandon] And, once again, I'm warning you guys. I'm sick. So…
[Chuckles]
[Brandon] But I didn't want to miss out on this.
[Mary] But there's an astronaut.
[Brandon] Astronaut. Right. We once again have our friend, Kjell Lindgren.
[Kjell] And thank you so much for having me. I'm a big fan of Writing Excuses, and so it is amazing to be a part of the conversation.
[Howard] We got that on tape!
[Laughter]
[Howard] [inaudible, garbled]
[Dan] Going on the end of every episode now.
[Laughter]
 
[Mary] So, I have a ton of astronaut questions I've been wanting to ask you. So I'm afraid that this is going to be just a please tell us all the things, Kjell.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] I'm happy to share.
[Mary] Okay. So. You've talked about the vertigo in space. People… Like, that's all over the NASA website, people talk about that. But when you come back to earth, and you have vertigo again. How much is that like benign positional vertigo or is it completely in its own class of…
[Kjell] Yeah. So, when we say vertigo, I think that people have different interpretations of what that means. Dizziness, lightheadedness, actual spinning. I have a colleague that upon arriving in space, so right at the main engine cut off, after that third stage cut off, and now you are officially in weightlessness, felt like they were basically doing backflips.
[Mary] Wow.
[Kjell] So their… And just had this sensation… And I'm motioning with my hands, and I realize that the listeners can't…
[Chuckles]
[Kjell] See that, but… Essentially, felt like they were flipping backwards just constantly. They were able to get over that. I did not feel vertiginous, I did not have dizziness at all when I… Once I arrived on orbit. So after landing, there again, it really depends on the individual. Some people will feel vertiginous, things will be spinning. For me, if I kept my head very still, I actually felt fine. It is any type of acceleration. So tilting my head forward, pitching my head forward, or turning my head side to side very quickly, the sensation I would receive was far out of proportion to the movement that my head would make. So I could really get my kind of gyros spinning with very quick head movements. In particular, if I pitched my head forward, I would have fallen over. So you will see, if you look very closely at the astronauts that have just landed, so… What we're doing now, of course, is landing in the Soyuz space capsule. They carry them… They'll pull them out of the capsule, they'll put them on a lawn chair, put them on the ground. If you watch very closely, they'll keep their head… Most will keep their heads very still. So if somebody talks to them, they'll kind of look over at them…
[Laughter]
[Kjell] And smile, but they keep their head very still. We know this. So if you were feeling pretty good, you will actually move your head around a lot, because that gets you credit from your buddies, that your colleagues are like, "Man, he's doing great. Look at how he's moving his head around."
[Laughter]
[Mary] And you're like, "I am in a lawn chair."
[Laughter]
[Kjell] Exactly. So. Again, it really is up to the individual, their individual response. One of the… I mean, just very surreal experience that I had prior to launch, we had a… Before we leave Star City to [Bikaner?], we have a departure breakfast. Kind of a ceremonial toast to the crew that's departing for their launch. So all of the cosmonauts that live there in Star City will come to wish the crew farewell. So this… Let's see, it's Leonov, the first person ever to do a spacewalk. He is at the departure breakfast, and he gathers our crew together to just give us some tips and tricks as we're getting ready to fly. He said, "If you start to feel sick when you get onto orbit, just keep your head very still. Just don't move your head around." I just kind of took this picture in my brain of I'm getting flight advice from Alexey Leonov.
[Chuckles]
[Kjell] I mean, this is…
[Mary] That's amazing.
[Kjell] Very, very surreal.
 
[Brandon] You were telling us earlier, at lunch you were talking about the fact that when you first get up there, you get flu-like symptoms, because your blood, which is used to being pulled down by gravity, just kind of floods your whole body.
[Kjell] Yeah. Yeah, so we call this a fluid shift. So when you stand up on Earth, your blood… Gravity pulls it down into your legs, and we have physiologic mechanisms that are constantly working to keep the blood up at your brain, perfusing your brain. So your muscles are squeezing on the veins to push the blood up, your heart might beat a little bit faster when you first stand up, and all those mechanisms continue to work in weightlessness, but there's no gravity pulling that blood. It's not counteracting anything. So what that results in is this net shift of fluid up into your head and chest. So your face… Your head feels very full, you feel congested. If you look at your legs, they look incredibly skinny, and we call those bird legs. That's a part of, I think, this space adaptation syndrome of space motion sickness. But that fluid shift persists, really, kind of persists throughout the mission.
[Howard] That's why there are no giraffes in space. Because their heads would just explode.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] You know what… So I worked in a cardio… The space physiology laboratory. It used to be at NASA Ames Research Center. The giraffe is one of the animals that we looked… Giraffes and snakes that climb trees are animals that we looked at to try and understand how, like in a giraffe, that changes that hydrostatic column. When it bends down to drink, I mean…
[Howard] That's what I'm talking about, the amount of heart… pressure…
[Kjell] Absolutely.
[Howard] You gotta do to get blood up into that head. You put a giraffe in orbit, he hits freefall, and just [explosion sound].
[Laughter]
[Mary] Yeah, but the thing he was saying is when the giraffe puts their head down, that that shifts.
[Kjell] That almost gets you to the point where… Yeah. Now you're only dealing with the giraffe's innate blood pressure, but the fact now the hydrostatic column is actually increasing pressure down. So what mechanisms, intrinsic mechanisms, are there to prevent the giraffe's head from exploding when it bends down to take a drink?
[Laughter]
[Dan] So Howard's [telling a dumb joke]
[Kjell] I didn't think I'd be talking about… 
[Dan] About a giraffe exploding, and you saying, "No, that's actually a real thing."
[Laughter]
[Dan] That's my favorite thing that's happened today.
[Howard] Can you give me a little more credit than that? Because… 
[Mary] No. No, we cannot.
[Howard] All right. Fine.
 
[Brandon] Let's stop for our book of the week.
[Howard] Yes, please.
[Brandon] I'm going to do our book of the week. I think it's a very appropriate one. We're going to do R is for Rocket, by Ray Bradbury.
[Mary] Oh, yeah.
[Brandon] Which we haven't ever done, and it's my favorite Ray Bradbury collection. If you haven't read any Ray Bradbury, you're missing out. R Is for Rocket has my single favorite Ray Bradbury story of all time, Frost and Fire, in it. Which is about a planet where people live seven days. But it's also got A Sound of Thunder, which is his most… Second most famous probably short story. It's got The Long Rain, which is… It's got so many great things. It's just awesome. And it's fun, because, I mean, it was written in the 60s, right? In the 50s and 60s, and looking at space travel through the eyes of someone living back then and comparing it to now, I think it's just fine. I actually recently read a bunch of Bradbury stories. It's just delightful. I absolutely love reading that period.
[Howard] I remember reading A Sound of Thunder in high school, and really, really liking it, while at the same time being very, very disturbed by it.
[Brandon] Oh, it's… 
[Howard] It's a fun story.
[Brandon] Point of… 
[Howard] That's what it's for.
 
[Brandon] Let's go back to questions for an astronaut.
[Mary] Yeah. Okay. So I ask this question anytime someone says, "I would like to learn how to play bagpipes."
[Laughter]
[Mary] Why? Why would you like to learn to play bagpipes? Specifically, why did you think, "You know what, I'm going into space. I think I'll learn to play bagpipes in space."
[Kjell] Well, I grew up in England, from… I spent from my third grade until my freshman year in England, for the first four years near London, and then three years in Cambridge. I just… I fell in love with the bagpipes while living over there. I remember my parents taking us to a military tattoo, essentially a parade, and the pipes ushering in this parade.
[Mary] They're good outdoors.
[Kjell] Yes. Yes, they are good for the outdoors. I have always wanted to learn how to play the bagpipes. I thought… I'm not sure what I was thinking.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] But I thought it would be fun to play the bagpipes on the International Space Station. So we get a small personal allotment [garbled]
[Dan] Did any of the other people on the space station agree with [garbled]
[Kjell] None of them got to weigh in on this decision. The commander did not know I was going to have them up there until I was like, "Hey, Scott? Do you mind if I play the bagpipes?" I don't know if I even asked him. I think I started playing and…
[Dan] The commander's like, "Everyone, meet the new guy. His name is Kjell. And he brought bagpipes."
[Laughter]
[Mary] To an enclosed space that you cannot leave without a rocketship.
[Kjell] Yes. You cannot leave. Although you might be forced to leave.
[Chuckles]
[Kjell] So, to… I'm going to take a little bit of credit here. I found the absolute furthest place away from crew quarters to practice. So that was in one of our storage modules, and started practicing.
[Howard] Is that the one where the lighting is on the wrong side?
[Kjell] No, different one, different one.
[Howard] Oh, okay.
[Kjell] But I would poke my head out to see if anybody was like…
[Chuckles]
[Kjell] Reacting. And then started to normalize a little bit, and just was playing in various modules. Then, later on, asked Scott and Kimiya both, very pointedly, "Hey, does this bother you? Is this okay?" Scott said… You know what, actually, he grew up in New Jersey, it reminded him of firefighters playing when he was growing up. So it was a little… Probably not as well played, but a picture of home for him, during the one year mission. So… Then, Kimiya, honestly, is such a great guy. So easy to get along with, that even if it was the worst thing ever for him to listen to me playing the bagpipes, he would not admit to it, and he would just say, "Oh, no, it's fine."
[Chuckles]
[Howard] There is something to be…
[Kjell] So I have very supportive roommates.
[Howard] There is something to be said for being so willing to get along with other people that if those bagpipes make you happy, they make me happy. That is, there's something to that.
 
[Kjell] There absolutely is, and I think it's one of… Especially for long-duration spaceflight, it is one of the most important things that we bring with us as a crew member, and that is what we describe as expeditionary behavior. That is, first step, get yourself squared away. To be competent at doing the things that you need to do to be successful. To start working on time, to be efficient. So that then, you have enough bandwidth to help your crewmates. So you're squared away, and now the focus of your day is what can I do make his life better today? Scott's life, and Kimiya's life better today? What can I do? If we are all thinking that way, you just get along. Part of that is also what things do I do that irritate other people? I want to retract those friction points. What are the things that maybe he does that irritate me? I just I figure out ways to remove myself from that situation or do something differently, or, if we absolutely have to, have the conversation about hey, when I am practicing robotic arm operations, I'd really appreciate it if you weren't playing the bagpipes.
[Laughter]
[Howard] On the end of the robotic arm.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] So, it's really interesting. Right before my mission, I was thinking I'm going to spend six months in an enclosed space with the same-ish five people. We did have a small crew change out… In the middle of the mission, but… The same people. For that entire time. I thought I really wonder how this is going to go? I mean, is this… Are we going to… Are there going to be any issues? It was three months into the mission before I even thought about it again. Everybody just… Particularly in our crew, and I know other crews are like this, just work really hard to take care of each other to get along. So that ultimately, we can have a successful mission, and a productive mission.
[Howard] One of the ways I've heard it described, a guy I met on an Air Force Base who had been on submarines, was in that environment, we don't have the luxury of not getting along.
[Kjell] That's true. I mean, if you want to be successful…
[Mary] [garbled] the Internet.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] You have to get along, you have to figure out what is it that we need to do? Otherwise, the mission will not be successful. That is, as professionals up there, with the investment that our respective nations have made…
[Dan] Oh, God.
[Kjell] We cannot afford to not be successful.
[Howard] I'm being paid way too much to be a jerk.
[Laughter]
 
[Dan] Okay. I have a question for you. This is a question we typically ask on our What Do Writers Get Wrong episodes, but I'm curious, so I'm going to ask it anyway. What have you seen in media, in a book or a movie, a depiction of astronauts that you just think is… Just bugs you to death, and what else have you seen that you really loved, that they got something really right.
[Kjell] Wow. So, books are difficult, because a lot of… I think what really strikes me is movement in space and the physics of space. That really isn't depicted in a book. They talk about getting from one place to another. What's very jarring for me is seeing people floating through a capsule or through a space station… And it's not that I'm thinking about hey, Newton's third law of gravity. It's that just did not look right. It's somebody that's floating straight, and then all of a sudden, takes a hard right turn floating…
[Dan] Without touching anything.
[Kjell] Without grabbing anything or holding onto anything. Just immediately, it's like, "Okay, that was very weird." So it's things like that. Just the physics that I think become very second nature on orbit that you really have to think about if you have never been in that environment. I think that is viscerally what strikes me. I think from a storyline, the generation of drama from things that really don't need to be dramatic, when there are other things about living in space and operating in that environment. I mean, there are any number of things that can kill us at any time…
[Laughter]
[Kjell] And to come up with something goofy when…
[Chuckles]
[Kjell] It's vacuum. It's cold.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] Vacuum out there, people. I mean…
[Mary] There's plenty there.
[Kjell] I mean, yeah. There's plenty of risk there. So I think that those are things that kind of…
[Howard] Please don't add death to my job in new ways.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] Exactly.
[Howard] I already have a very long list of deaths.
 
[Dan] So, can you give us some examples of people who, or artists, that you feel have done a really good job?
[Kjell] You know what, I really enjoyed reading Andy Weir's The Martian. As a crew, it was really cool. We got to watch that movie before it was released to the public. We got to watch it on the space station.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] We got to watch this movie, and I really enjoyed the book. We got to watch it in space. So…
[Mary] I'm sure that some place, Andy Weir is going, "They watched my movie in space!"
[Laughter]
[Mary] That's what I would do.
[Howard] My head is doing the zero gravity giraffe right now.
[Laughter]
[Dan] We have a good writing prompt.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] There was… There were things about that that showed clearly they had done their research. There were things that nobody else would have caught that just resonated with us during that movie. One of them was when the main character, when Mark Watney is looking through everybody's stuff to look for food. So as he is pulling out the food and going through the menus, he's listing like beef stroganoff and chicken teriyaki and rice pilaf. So I'm watching him do that, and then I look at our food pantry right over here, and that's our… Those are… That's stuff from our menu.
[Laughter]
[Kjell] I'm like, "Oh, my gosh. That's our menu." So just little details that really nobody else would have noticed that just make a story like that more real.
[Mary] That's fantastic.
 
[Brandon] Well, I think we are out of time. Do you really want to do that as our writing prompt, Dan?
[Laughter]
[Mary] Zero gravity giraffe.
[Dan] The zero gravity giraffe? So Howard said a phrase, "I'm doing the zero gravity giraffe." Find your own interpretation of what that means, and write a story about it.
[Brandon] Kjell, thank you very much for your time.
[Kjell] Well, thank you for having me.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
 
mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 13.7: What Writers Get Wrong, with Lou Perry
 
 
Key points: What do writers get wrong about the law? Objection! Sustained! No basis? Actually, objection, leading the witness is okay, BUT you have to be leading the witness, on direct examination, not cross-examination. You are allowed to lead opposing witnesses, even be argumentative with them. Judges don't usually do off-the-cuff rulings. Note that sometimes you have to make a choice between the narrative and accuracy. But the middle ground might work, with the real thing between scenes or offscreen. Legal actions take time. Other pet peeves? Fiery closing arguments. Don't imitate Law & Order. Slow, boring, meticulous does the job. Small town lawyers are likely to be general practitioners, while big city firms are more likely to have specialists. Cross-examination of a dishonest witness might make a good piece of courtroom drama to put in a story. The best way to learn about courtrooms is to go to the courthouse and watch a trial. 
The prosecution rests... )
[Brandon] This is Writing Excuses, What Do Writers Get Wrong, with Lou Perry.
[Mary] 15 minutes long.
[Dan] Because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Brandon] I'm Brandon.
[Mary] I'm Mary.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Howard] And I'm ready to learn something.
[Brandon] We have special guest star, Lou.
[Lou] Thanks for having me.
[Brandon] Our pleasure. Thank you for being on the podcast. We are again live at GenCon.
[Whoo! Cheering.]
[Mary] Right. So, Lou, in order to make our audience understand that you don't exist along a single axis, tell us a little bit about yourself.
[Lou] Sure. Well, I'm here because I'm a lawyer, but I'm also a father and a husband, a writer, a reader, and as of a few months ago, I got way too into [Eight mander?] girls softball.
[Laughter]
[Brandon] And became a rabid, rabid fan.
 
[Mary] So, what are we going to be focusing on today?
[Lou] Unfortunately, not the softball. We're going to be focusing on the law and what you folks get wrong with it.
[Laughter]
[Mary] So what writers get wrong with law.
[Brandon] This is probably a long, long, long list. We'd probably need an hour to get it all.
[Howard] And an attorney.
[Laughter]
[Howard] I mean, like representation.
[Lou] Yeah, it's gotten to the point for me where I don't watch legal shows. I try not to read anything that has anything to do with the law. I've closed books before when that comes up and I wasn't expecting it.
 
[Dan] Is there one particular cliché or pet peeve that stands out above the others? That you're just like, "That again!"
[Lou] Yeah. Objecting with no basis.
[Laughter]
[Lou] And then the judge making a ruling with no basis.
[Laughter]
[Lou] Objection!
[Brandon] Tell us more.
[Lou] Sustained.
[Dan] We're just idiots. What do you mean by that?
[Lou] So, often times in trials, somebody'll be making an argument, and the opposing counsel will object. There are bases for objection, there's rules of evidence. In the lazier pieces of fiction, what you find is people just randomly objecting and there randomly being rulings on those objections, not based on any reason.
[Mary] So, in the real world, what would an objection sound like?
[Lou] Objection. Leading the witness. Now, you actually have to be leading the witness to have that objection. It has to be on direct examination, not cross-examination. A lot of times, I see, especially in TV shows, prosecutors will be objecting to a defense counsel who is leading a witness, but the witness is the prosecutor's witness. So you're allowed to lead opposing witnesses. You're also allowed to be argumentative with opposing witnesses, because that's what cross-examination is.
[Mary] Got it.
[Brandon] Okay. Wow.
 
[Mary] So then when a judge does the sustained or doesn't… When you say that there's a ruling, I take it that that's more than just that one word, he would actually…
[Lou] He usually will make a more robust ruling. Sometimes there'll end up being a ruling in writing. Sometimes there'll be a recess. Sometimes there will be a conference outside of the jury, and they'll come to… Attorneys will come to some agreement. Sometimes there will just be an off-the-cuff ruling.
[Brandon] So there is never a time where there's like objection, overruled, objection, sustained, like over and over again. Does that just not happen, right?
[Lou] I have never seen that happen.
[Laughter]
[Dan] So what you're saying is that the law is really complicated?
[Lou] It's very complicated
[Whoa!]
[Howard] What you're also saying is that unless we've been in a courtroom, we've never seen anything remotely like a real trial.
[Lou] I think that's correct.
 
[Mary] Is there anything among lawyers that you're like, "Oh, this one. This one actually has it mostly right."
[Lou] You mean in terms of fiction that I've [garbled read.]
[Dan] Yeah.
[Mary] Fiction or film, media, any…
[Lou] John Grisham does an okay job. He was actually a lawyer. He knows what he's doing, but he's making choices to serve the narrative which sometimes annoys me.
[Laughter]
[Lou] But he gets it right more often than he gets it wrong.
[Mary] Okay.
[Lou] He does get it wrong, but I think it's on purpose.
 
[Dan] That's actually a good point to make, that sometimes, even as an expert, you do need to make choices in favor of the narrative over accuracy.
[Lou] Absolutely.
[Brandon] But you will lose some readers every time you do that. Often finding the middle ground is the best thing to do. Saying, "All right, let's indicate that the real thing happened, kind of between scenes or offscreen or hint at it," and things like this, so that the person who is an expert can look at it and be like, "All right. It's okay, they're covering their bases. I can go on and enjoy this."
 
[Mary] What are some of the things that signal to you… I mean, you've said that you will already just not read a book if there appears to be legal stuff in there. But are there early indicators that this one might be okay? I do the same thing, like I avoid puppet books for the same reason.
[Lou] An early indicator, I think, would be…
[Mary] The author's bio?
[Lou] Maybe the author's bio.
[Chuckles]
[Lou] But if I am in a book where legal things are happening, if they're getting just the general sense that these things take time, there's no big surprise thing happening in a legal action that's going to ultimately cause the case to speed up, things go very slow. If that's happening, I can generally be on board with it. But at this point, I have just kind of given up. So…
 
[Mary] So what are some other things… Because one of the things I have to admit that I really enjoy about this particular series is watching people rant about things.
[Chuckles]
[Mary] What are some other pet peeves that you have?
[Lou] Sure. Fiery closing arguments. Those tend to really annoy the judges, I think.
[Mary] Really? Why is that?
[Lou] Because they think you're imitating Law & Order.
[Laughter]
[Lou] They probably feel much like I do about Law & Order, they probably hate it. The trick there, though, is your client really likes it. Because they've also seen Law & Order.
[Laughter]
[Lou] So those fiery closing arguments do happen. It's just debatable…
[Howard] So television is why we can't have nice things.
[Lou] Television is why we can't have nice things. Correct.
[Dan] I remember I was on jury duty several years ago, and was surprised by how different it was from what I thought it was going to be. But that was one of the things that really stood out to me, was the really slow, boring, meticulous lawyer absolutely won that case. He didn't give the big fiery speech, he wasn't trying to be charismatic, he was just trying to present his case as thoroughly and relentlessly as possible.
[Lou] I think that's right. That's usually the way it should be done.
 
[Mary] Now is it different when you have… When you're talking to a judge versus talking to a jury?
[Lou] A bench trial would be very different. I think you would find both parties, both lawyers, doing exactly what Dan was talking about. Being very meticulous… Understanding that the judge has seen this all a thousand times, and you're not going to impress him with some turn of phrase or some fiery speech. Juries are just another factor that you have to put in. You have to understand who you have in your jury and whether or not they're going to respond to that sort of thing.
 
[Brandon] Let's go ahead and stop for our book of the week. You're going to pitch a book to us.
[Lou] I am going to pitch a book. The book I'm pitching is called Ghouljaw by an Indiana native named Clint Smith. It's out from Hippocampus Press. It's Midwestern, weird fiction, short stories. Very good stuff. Kind of literary. Also kind of schlocky and funny, in parts. I really enjoyed it, and I think everybody else would, too.
 
[Brandon] Awesome. Well, let me ask you a question on that. Can lawyer or law fiction or things like that get so schlocky that you can enjoy it again? Can it just be so far off?
[Lou] I think the Frank Castle scene in Daredevil was so far off and so goofy and just so wrong and so angering…
[Chuckles]
[Lou] That I came around to the other side and sort of enjoyed it.
[Laughter]
[Brandon] Okay.
[Howard] I don't know that that was what Brandon was hoping for.
[Laughter]
[Mary] I have to admit that I'm surprised that you watched Daredevil at all.
[Lou] Well, there's a fundamental tension when it's involving comic book…
[Laughter]
[Lou] Heroes from my childhood. So I will watch that. I mean, that also had ninjas and stuff.
[Mary] Fair. Fair.
 
[Dan] Now that's a question. Let me ask really quick because I remember years and years ago being in a WorldCon panel about fencing where people were just griping about how bad the fencing was in Princess Bride. But then, at the end of the panel, one of the people asked, "Okay, but be honest. How many of you got into fencing because of Princess Bride?" Every member of the panel raised their hand.
[Chuckles]
[Dan] So like, what are some of the… I mean, is that how you got into law, in some ways?
[Lou] No. I got into law… I was an English major in undergrad, and…
[Mary] Realized you wanted to make some money.
[Lou] I wasn't finding much in the way of a job market, and I went to law school, and it turned out to be the right fit. I think writing and the law kind of go hand-in-hand. I found I did pretty well in law school. Not because I was the smartest or the best student, but I think I was a better writer than some. That was due to the English degree, and due to the… Always reading.
[Howard] It's amazing how much good written communication can jumpstart your career in any field where people at work think for a living.
[Lou] That's right.
[Brandon] When I was in my degree program, the English major, one of the number one follow-ups to an English major was a law degree. Which I… It just shocked me, because I was just like, "Isn't everyone here to read Jane Austen and dance through the flowers?"
[Laughter]
[Brandon] That's why I was there. But apparently that's a really good preparation for a law degree, which should, alone, tell us a little bit more… A little bit about how different being an attorney is from how it's presented.
 
[Mary] Now, one of the things that I understand is that there are multiple different types of attorneys. So can you kind of break down some of the things? Because I think that a lot of people… One of the mistakes that I will see is that they think that all attorneys are the same thing. That if you do corporate law, it's the same thing as being trial law, it's the same thing as…
[Lou] Yeah. I mean, it really depends on where you're living. If you're in a smaller town, you're going to do a lot of stuff… You're going to be a general practitioner. If you're in a bigger city, there's a good chance you're going to be in a decent-sized firm and you're going to be specializing in one certain thing. Maybe it's corporate law. I do intellectual property litigation. It could be nonprofit law. But generally, everybody has kind of a niche practice. But then you go out into the smaller counties in Indiana, and those guys do everything. They do criminal law, they do corporate law, they do IP law. They do some of it better than other portions of it, but they just do it all.
 
[Mary] So, let's say, since you have admitted that you will avoid them like the plague. What would make you… If one of our writers did this… What would make you go, I would read it if you did this?
[Lou] See, that's a tough question, because if you got the law all right, it would be a very, very boring story.
[Laughter]
[Howard] I guess… To approach it differently, what if… You have a story which is overwhelmingly in a different area, and the story crosses through at some point a courtroom. What pieces of the courtroom, what pieces of that activity, can I show that will convince you that this is okay, without boring my readers to absolute tears?
[Lou] I think a cross-examination of a dishonest witness is a very fun thing to do, and to watch. But it's got to be done in a not terribly dramatic way. But I think there are a lot of ways to build tension and to get a lot of character across and also to tell a lot of story through what's being said and not said.
 
[Dan] So, given that we don't have much time here, and can't necessarily go into it all right now, what are some good resources that our listeners could look to to find out how to do something like that correctly?
[Lou] I think if you go to your local county courthouse and just sit around and watch a trial, I think that would be a very good thing to do. You can get deposition transcripts. You can read those. That's probably not the most scintillating reading.
[Chuckles]
[Lou] But it's… They're all out there. A lot of stuff's online. That's what I would do.
 
[Brandon] Excellent. We're out of time, but you did have some homework for us.
[Lou] I did. It's going to be very unpopular.
[Laughter. Good.]
[Lou] I was thinking about this. I'm going to suggest that everybody go out and pick a Supreme Court opinion, preferably where Justice Scalia is dissenting. Read it. Read the opinion, that's likely written by Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Then read Justice Scalia's dissent. Try to keep an open mind about what he's saying and why he's saying it. Also pay attention to the law that's at issue. I think you'll find that you can see where he's coming from and you'll see where Ginsburg is coming from. And you can see the fundamental problem with the law as written.
[Brandon] Excellent. Wow.
[Mary] Cool.
[Brandon] Well, thank you so much, Lou, for being on the podcast with us. Thank you to our audience.
[Clapping]
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.
 
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 11.43: Elemental Drama Q&A, with Tananarive Due

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2016/10/23/11-43-elemental-drama-qa-with-tananarive-due/

Q&A Summary
Q: Rather than having a protagonist change themselves, can a protagonist be an impetus for change in others as a source of drama?
A: Yes. James Bond and iconic superheroes rarely change, but the interesting stories are about the people around them changing. Episodic stories often have a main character who doesn't change, with the changes happening to the people around them.
Q: What happens when a character refuses to learn and overcome their fatal flaw?
A: Tragedy. Key question is can the character change? If they fail, that's a tragedy.
Q: What are the lines between drama and melodrama?
A: Music. True melodrama winks at the audience. Accidental melodrama usually means you didn't introduce the characters and show us the motivation for the conflict. Make sure the emotion is earned.
Q: Do you have any tips for writing body language that reveals a character's internal state?
A: Puppetry has three movements, aggressive, passive, and regressive. Aggressive, lean towards and engage further. Passive, sit still. Regressive, lean back and disengage or avoid. Add in open or closed silhouette, with arms out or crossed, reflecting engaging or not engaging. Top it off with the point of view character interpreting or reacting. Don't overdo it! Use body language to remove ambiguity or emphasize. No head bobbing, please.
Q: When do you not show character growth? Is it sometimes good to have it not exist? Is there a reason not to add drama?
A: Contrast with external events, or contrast with another character.
Q: When writing a character that undergoes a great change that makes him or her radically different, how do you keep it realistic? Also, how do you realistically show people acting differently from their schema?
A: This is a reflection of the difference between what character is perceived to be and who they are internally. Hang a lantern on the fact that they are struggling with who they think they are and who they really are. Make the character realize who they really are and what they are really capable, and let them be heroes and heroines.

Looking for a hero... )
[Brandon] I think we're going to call it there. I really want to thank Tananarive for coming on with us.
[Tananarive] Oh, thank you.
[Brandon] And I want to thank our audience.
[Whoo!]
[Brandon] Howard has some homework for you.
[Howard] I do. The name for this is if I only had a brain. We're going to be starting issue with our next month of elemental genre. We're talking about the issue elemental genre. What I want you to avoid is the strawman. Take the issue that you are planning on writing about or take an issue about which you are passionate. Identify both sides. Identify which side you are on. Then take the other side and write it convincingly. Put a brain in the strawman. In fact, go ahead and put meat and bone and all of the other body bits on the strawman and turn this into a person, because actual people hold the position that you abhor or disagree with, and they are actual people. Once you can do that, once you can write both sides convincingly, we will believe your book.
[Brandon] Excellent. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 11.42: Elemental Drama As a Sub-Genre

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2016/10/16/11-42-elemental-drama-as-a-sub-genre/

Key points: Drama means character change. It's a basic component of a compelling story. How you introduce the conflict helps to distinguish between primary genre and subgenre. Often subgenres are short, poignant shifts, in one scene. Why add them? Because readers connect with drama, with the emotional impact. How do you add it? Think about who the character wants to be, and their fatal flaw. That gives you an internal struggle that you can manifest in external conflicts. Also consider having the character be mistaken about what they need, and discover what they really need. Subtle moments, like turning off the targeting computer, can be wonderful moments of subgenre drama. Watch for the don, don, don moments! Make sure your character earns those moments, don't just play the music and expect cheers.
Just a moment of subgenre... )
[Brandon] We are out of time on this episode.
[Laughter]
[Brandon] Mary ruined it. We're going to run and cut it right there. We are going to give it back to Mary dangerously to give us some homework.
[Mary] All right. So. We have been talking about the ways in which a character's internal conflict affects the people around them. What I want you to think about is your starting example is you know when you're driving someplace and you're having an intense car conversation about something really heavy while at the same time having to navigate. So you have two conflicts going on simultaneously. You have an emotional conflict and a logistical conflict. What I want you to do is, I want you to look at your manuscript and take two scenes that have different conflicts. One is emotional, and related to the character's internal drama. The other is a logistical one. I want you to combine them so that things happen in the same scene in concert. Your character's going to be bouncing back and forth between dealing with those two things. Their emotional state is going to affect the way they approach the logistical problems. So I want you to try to blend those two things to make that subgenre happen within a single scene.
[Brandon] Awesome. And our audience. You guys are awesome, too.
[Yay! Whistles]
[Brandon] Thank you guys so much. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 11.40: Elemental Drama

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2016/10/02/11-40-elemental-drama/

Key Points: Drama as an elemental genre focuses on a character's journey and transformation, and how this affects everyone around them. Character transformation is elemental drama. Coming-of-age stories, descent into madness, whenever a character learns something and changes. That is the driving force that keeps you reading, how is this character changing. Drama often starts with a downward slope, but it does not have to have a tragic ending. Drama often has a catharsis, a release of tension as we experience the change. As writers, use progress, the try-fail cycle, to keep the reader engaged. Also, make the characters interesting! Many dramas have other elemental genres supporting it. The downward slope is often where the character is broken down to allow rebuilding. What are the beats in a drama? Tearing down or showing what's broken. Also showing what is not broken. Showing the moment of decision that starts the descent. Something that shows they can succeed, that there is a capacity and a spark. Often there is a character who shows what the main character needs to succeed. Often there is also a foreshadowing or example of what happens if they fail.

One man deciding what to do... )

[Brandon] Let's go ahead and give some homework. Mary, you're going to give us some homework?
[Mary] Yeah. So we've been talking about the foreshadowing of failure state, and frequently in dramas, you have a character who represents that failure state. We talked about the fool, we talked about the dropout druggie kid in the coming-of-age stories. So I want you to do is I want you to look at something that you have recently written, and go back and insert a character. Make them integral. Insert a character who represents the failure state for your protagonist.
[Brandon] Excellent. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses 11.1: Introduction to Elemental Genre

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2016/01/03/writing-excuses-11-1-introduction-to-elemental-genre/

Key Points: Season 11 is going to be different! Elemental genres. Each month, expect the first week to be an elemental drill down, second week to be a wild card, third week to be using the elemental genre in subplots, and the fourth week will be Q&A. Elemental genres are the things that make you read, the emotional resonance that drives a story. Not bookshelf genres, but elemental genres. The 11 elemental genres planned are wonder, idea, adventure, horror, mystery, thriller, humor, relationship, drama, issue, and ensemble. This is a framework for talking about what makes readers turn the page and have emotional responses, not a hard-and-fast set of categories or rules. Elemental genres let you mix-and-match underneath the veneer of the bookshelf categories.
Underneath the veneer, they found elemental genres! )
[Brandon] But I am going to give you some homework today. Your homework is actually to take some of the films and books that you love, and I want you to try and drill down to... You don't have to really define the elemental genre, because we haven't defined all of these for you yet. But what I really want you to do is start looking at what the emotional impact of that story is. What the people who made the story are doing to you. How they're hacking your brain. Try to relate... Try to strip away the veneer and dig down at it for yourself. Pick three of those, books and films that you love, and see if you can do it. This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses Season Three Episode 27: Mixing Humor with Drama and Horror

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2009/12/01/writing-excuses-season-3-episode-27-mixing-humor-with-drama-and-horror/

Key points: To blend humor and drama, start with the drama, identify the key points, then add humor. Humor is good while reading, but drama and character make readers come back. When the humor detracts, excise! Be careful about humor that pushes readers out of the story. Make humor fit the character -- don't break characters for a joke.
Chunks of humor, drama, and horror )
[Brandon] All right. Howard, we're going to make you do the writing prompt because you're the expert on this.
[Howard] Okay. Take the most intense character tragedy you can imagine for a character that you've already got and find humor in it for another character to point out. Whether or not it's appropriate, find humor in that tragedy.
[Brandon] All right. This has been Writing Excuses. [The podcast cut off at this point. We can only assume that Brandon provided the tag line "You're out of excuses, now go write."]

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789 101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 04:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios