mbarker: (Burp)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 19.44: A Close Reading on Structure: Tradition and Innovation
 
 
Key points: Where does it fit into the fantasy lineage? Using tradition, but also breaking from it. In conversation with... What the writer intends and what the audience thinks. The conversation that the author is having with the genre and the conversation that the reader is having. Anxiety of influence! Fifth Season is a break from the restoration line of epic fantasy.  "The world is what it is. Unless you destroy it and start all over again, there's no changing it." Each POV is in a different genre. Story as unfolding and telling. When writing, do you think of being in conversation with other books, or with the canon? What has made you the storyteller you are? Who are you telling stories to? Be aware of the traditions you are following, and of the ones you are breaking. 
 
[Season 19, Episode 44]
 
[unknown] People are driven by the search for better. But when it comes to hiring, the best way to search for a candidate isn't to search at all. Don't search, match with Indeed. The hiring process can be slow and overwhelming. Simplify hiring with Indeed. Indeed is your matching and hiring platform. With over 350 million global monthly visitors, according to Indeed data, and a matching engine that helps you find quality candidates fast. Ditch the busy work. Use Indeed for scheduling, screening, and messaging, so you can connect with candidates faster. Join more than 3.5 million businesses worldwide that use Indeed to hire great talent fast. Listeners of this show will get a 75 dollar sponsored job credit to get your jobs more visibility at indeed.com/podkatz13. That's indeed.com/podkatz13. Terms and conditions apply.
 
[Howard] Writing doesn't have to be a solitary activity. That's why we host in person retreats and workshops. At the Writing Excuses retreats, you'll get access to classes, one-on-one office hours, critique sessions, and activities to keep you inspired and motivated. Become a more engaging storyteller and learn how to navigate the publishing landscape. As you make meaningful progress on your stories, you'll also build connections with your fellow writers that will last for years to come. Check out our upcoming events at writingexcuses.com/retreats.
 
[Mary Robinette] This episode of Writing Excuses has been brought to you by our listeners, patrons, and friends. If you would like to learn how to support this podcast, visit www.patreon.com/writingexcuses.
 
[Season 19, Episode 44]
 
[Mary Robinette] This is Writing Excuses.
[DongWon] A Close Reading on Structure: Tradition and Innovation
[Erin] 15 minutes long, because you're in a hurry.
[Howard] And we're not that smart.
[Mary Robinette] I'm Mary Robinette.
[DongWon] I'm DongWon.
[Erin] I'm Erin.
[Howard] And I'm Howard.
 
[DongWon] So, this week I wanted to talk about another aspect of Fifth Season. I think we're going to zoom out a little bit, a little further away from the text. This is coming from a little bit of my perspective, both as an English major and someone who almost went into academia, and also as a publisher. But one thing that I'm really interested in talking about this book is the way it fits into the lineage of fantasy novels. I think this is a really interesting thing to think about when thinking about how to structure a book, how to frame a book. This kind of touches on some stuff like Hero's Journey kind of things and the way that's used in fiction. But also, just the place that this book has in the canon of fantasy literature, to use a loaded term. So, in a lot of ways, modern epic fantasy is established by Lord of the Rings and a lot of it is descended from that. I think Fifth Season is a really interesting break from that tradition that nonetheless is in conversation with it. Right? One thing that struck me on my second reading of the book several years ago was how much of it uses the classic fantasy tropes. Right? To me, it felt so contemporary and so fresh and so different. But when I stepped back for a second, I said, "Wait a minute. This is a book about wizards who go to a magic school and use crystal magic." I was like, this is just the most classic fantasy I've read in a second. Like, harkening back to, like, Tolkien seventies, eighties fantasy. And the way she pulled from that and yet flipped it and reversed it to create such an exciting, fresh work.
[Mary Robinette] One of the things… I'm glad you brought this up. One of the things that I also love about that, in that is that much like when you look back at the Wizard Master… Excuse me, The Wizard of Earthsea, that magic does basically one thing, you use words and you can change things. Yes, there are nine different Masters, but it's basically, you use words and you can change things. The thing that's happening here is you've got one thing they can do, they can do some vibrational stuff.
[DongWon] Yep.
[Mary Robinette] It's all of the different ways in which it can be twisted and pushed, and then is in conversation with this whole, larger body of work that is outside of fantasy that causes it to be doing some really interesting fresh things. Also, I just need to put out a little shout out to Dark Crystal, which is my favorite crystal magic.
[Laughter]
[DongWon] Yes.
 
[Erin] I [garbled really] like the phrase in conversation with… Such an interesting one, because some of it is like we don't actually know…
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[Erin] Like, we believe that a work is in conversation with another work. I remember earlier you were saying that this work is maybe a little bit in conversation with Octavia Butler. I agree with all these things, but it's interesting, like, how do we know sort of what tradition a book is drawing from? How much of that is the book doing it, and how much of it is us doing it? Because we bring our own context…
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] With us. So we're like, oh, I see these things here, and I've seen them in other places.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] It's a really interesting thing. Unless you ask the author, which we will…
[DongWon] Yes.
[Erin] It's hard to know.
[DongWon] Well, it's the difference between sort of intent and the reader. Right? My subjectivity… Sorry, we're getting a little academic here. But my subjectivity as the reader is projecting all of the stuff that I've read. Right? Like, I'm not super familiar with Dark Crystal, so I don't see that. I do… I am familiar with Earthsea and Lord of the Rings and parable of the sower. So, for me, I'm seeing this book as being deeply in conversation with those three things. We were off mic talking about Omelas as well, the ones who walk away from Omelas, another Le Guin story that this feels very in conversation with as well. Right? So…
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] I think what traditions it's pulling from is fascinating.
 
[Mary Robinette] So, for me, one of the definitions of genre is that it is literature that is in conversation with itself. That you are both be… Not just that it's the writer is thinking about it. It's that it is… The readers are having conversations about it. So, regardless of what Nora intended with this, because of the way it's being read, because of the way it's positioned, it is in conversation through the conversations of the readers. Actually, as we were talking about it, I think for me… I said Dark Crystal because it is puppets, but for me the thing that it actually brought to mind more was Crystal Singer. Which is a much older…
[Howard] McCaffrey. [Garbled]
[Mary Robinette] Anne McCaffrey. Sorry, my brain just… Similar, one of the similar things there is that you have to have this particular skill, which is, in that case, perfect pitch. Then you go to this planet and you go through this transformation. Some people get turned into rock people by accident. But you are locked into this career now. Because you can no longer exist… There's a symbiont in this case, is the mechanism. But it's still that idea of this being locked in, being enslaved, for the benefit of this other civilization that then convinces you that the reason it's okay is because you are highly valued. So that then the characters become part of their own narrative.
[Howard] I just realized that's exactly like being a web cartoonist…
[Laughter]
[Howard] Because I could no longer exist without the Internet.
[DongWon] Also, you start to turn into rock…
[Howard] I was just going to die…
[Laughter] [garbled]
 
[Howard] I started to turn into a rock. No, the… Sorry, the important thing that I was going to say was that whether or not the author is consuming, is aware of, is having a conversation with the genre, the reader probably is. The best example I can think of for this is the TV show Heroes, which, when it came out, a bunch of us said we've already read this comic book. It's just the X-Men. Why are you trying to read tell it? We've already done this. Heroes was wonderful. It did neat things. But it was trying to do so without the audience having read comic books. Which can't happen. So, when you talk about tradition and innovation, it's entirely possible to convince yourself through anxiety of influence that you are innovating because you are not reading everything else. That's probably not the way it's going to be read.
[DongWon] Right. One thing that I think about Fifth Season is it is deeply in a lineage, in a tradition, and I do think that Nora knows that. Or N. K. Jemison knows that. But… How she thinks about it, I'm very curious to hear. I've not had a conversation with her about it. But, something that I do think is really important is that this book also represents a rupture. This is a very stark departure from one of the core… What I think is one of the defining impulses of epic fantasy, and what I also think is exciting is that because of this rupture, we've seen the start of a new lineage. I see fantasy works now in conversation with Fifth Season, rather than Lord of the Rings as they sort of… I mean, the Poppy war is the example that this brings to mind the most. And because… What I see the difference is, is most epic fantasy… I'm not saying that N. K. Jemison was the first person to do this, but she did it, I think, in a way that was very effective and sort of opened the genre up, is most epic fantasy is what I think of as restoration fantasy. Right? So, Lord of the Rings, the world was good, it has fallen through the rise of Sauron, and just the general, like, rise of the age of men, and the goal is to restore the former glory. The goal is to get Aragorn, the heirs of Numenon, back on… Not Numenon…
[Howard] Numenor.
[DongWon] Numenor, back on the throne. That is so much of what that book is about. The farmboy finds a magic sword can defeat the evil, restore the kingdom to the place of justice and glory and good. It is about restoring a former order. Right? This is part of what makes a lot of epic fantasy inherently conservative, because it's saying things that used to be good, we need to get back to those ways of being. Right? Fifth Season is saying the exact opposite, of examining structures over and over again and saying these things are broken beyond repair. Because we are exploiting people, damaging people, hurting people in a way that the only answer is to burn it down and start something new. Right? Or it's not even particularly interested in what the new thing to start is. It is interested in the examination of what has gone wrong entirely at this point, to the parts that we, as the readership… I don't know that every reader is feeling this way, but are coming around a little bit to maybe Alibaster was right. Maybe he had a point. This is the Magneto is right argument for X-Men fans, of which I've been a big component of. This is Kill Monger's right, this is siding with the villain a little bit because restoration can't be the answer for everybody.
[Mary Robinette] There's a line in the book that is the world is what it is. Unless you destroy it and start all over again, there's no changing it.
[DongWon] Exactly. Speaking of accepting things being the way they are, let's go to break for a moment, and will be right back.
 
[Mary Robinette] I want to tell you about Family Reservations by Eliza Palmer. This is so good. It is not a science fiction or fantasy book. This is mainstream. You should read it. It weaves together some of the most complex family dynamics I've seen. Part way through it, I was thinking, "Oh. Oh, this is King Lear." Eliza describes it as succession meets fine dining. So it has some of the most delicious food descriptions ever. The story does a beautiful job of handling omniscient narrator. And I highly recommend it, not just because it's a fantastic read, but also because it is a masterful use of omniscient narration. If you been wanting to play with this tool, this book is a really good one to read to see how it's been handled in a modern context. Although you should expect to come away being very hungry.
 
[DongWon] Okay. Before the break, Mary Robinette, I think you had a point that you were trying to expand on with the quotation of that line.
[Mary Robinette] So, it's just that when we talk about things that are in conversation, and when you look at when this book was written in the conversations around Black Lives Matter and breaking the world, there are parallels that a modern reader will bring to that, whether or not it is intended. Then, I think, also one of the things about it for me that is interesting structurally is that if you think about the structure of the book also breaks structure. Like, it is not structured the way you've seen other books structured. That is part of what makes it feel so fresh, is that we aren't seeing regurgitation of the hero's journey. Although she is re-purchasing parts of it. Like, when you look at a hero's journey, there's a mentor, there's a character, like, Alibaster is literally called the mentor. The Guardians, one of the other things that happens when they go into the Threshold is that... In the Monomyth, you meet the Guardian, and they are literally called the Guardians. But they are the evil ones in this. It's... It is interesting to me that then the way that first book works, it interrupts the hero's journey at what some people call the dark night of the soul. Sometimes people call it the descent into the abyss, where we literally go into the earth. Like… So… But it is fundamentally not the hero's journey.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] This book is fundamentally not that. It is taking those elements, it is breaking them, and it is re-purposing them to build this entirely new structure.
[Erin] I think it's like bringing new things in. I mean, the… It's so funny to think about the hero's journey. It's also maybe… It's there, but, like, it is only one small… There are a lot of ways to tell stories.
[Mary Robinette] Exactly.
[DongWon] Yes.
[Erin] There are a lot of traditions of storytelling. We have a small one that we've taken and sort of, like, that has been part of fantasy that I think does come from that Tolkien way of thinking. I feel like one of the things that I've been really loving in recent works in general is seeing different ways of telling stories coming into things. I think that probably there's also some of that that this… That this book is in… Is in conversation with. Even though not everyone may know that that's a voice that's being…
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] Added to the conversation.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] I think that's something really cool that books can do, which is that you don't have to understand every single thing that the book is working with in order to enjoy that story, in order for that story to be influential on other stories that are being told.
[DongWon] Exactly. It goes into the ambient conversation and space, and then people start responding to it.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. One of the things that I particularly enjoyed is that each kind of track of the story has a different structure.
[DongWon] Yes.
[Mary Robinette] That works with each other's. So, Dam…
[DongWon] Damaya.
[Mary Robinette] Damaya. Damaya is very like, "Oh. Here is the orphan child who is becoming the chosen one," kind of thing. Syonite is getting very much the reluctant hero journey. For the beginning of it. But then when you start braiding them together, where these things are working in parallel, they fracture, they go in different directions. Then you got this other thing, the whole second person section, which doesn't play by any of those rules.
 
[DongWon] This is a trick I think of most clearly used in Game of Thrones, where each POV character is in a different genre of story. Some are in event, like… You have… What's the young girl's name, I'm blanking on her. But each of the characters, they're like, some are in an adventure story, some are in a political stunt story, some are in a straight up horror story. Right? Some are in a supernatural story, some are in a grounded political fantasy. N. K. Jemison has done that here, where again, we have the child coming into her own power, we have the wizard at the height of her power exploring the world, and then we have the very contemporary sort of like tragic hero story. Again, going back to the parallelism or the POV, realizing that all three are the same person…
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] Is just… Makes it a stunning trick in terms of how it operates within the genre conversation.
[Howard] Um. I was just reading a bit from Leverage Redemption, the new seasons of leverage. One of the characters says, "Hey, look. We're going to mess this guy up pretty hard. Are we the bad guys here?"
[Chuckles]
[Howard] Sophie says, "Oh, yes. Never forget that, Brianna. We're not heroes, we're just necessary." I love that moment, because in one context, yes, you're necessary and I'm siding with you. You are in… You're hurting this person, but you're doing a good that needs to happen. And on the other hand, I look at it and say, in the context of Fifth Season, well, this is probably how the Guardians feel about themselves. Oh, we're not the good guys, but we're necessary. And just that brushstroke across the Tolkien line of black-and-white, good versus evil… That's silvery gray brushstroke, it just shimmers and invites you to stare at it. I love it.
[Mary Robinette] There's an interlude at the one third mark in this book, which arguably is the end of Act One, sure. But it literally says, "A break in the pattern, a snarl in the weft. There are things you should be noticing here, things that are missing and conspicuous by their absence." I think that's one of the things that makes this so powerful, is that she is… There's a line from Hemingway that says that a story is the things that you leave out. And the things that she's choosing not to show, the structural elements that she is choosing not to use… We don't get the reconciliation. We don't get the restoration. All of those things that are being left out on purpose are what makes this so interesting.
[DongWon] Yeah. An earlier [garbled] reference how she calls out I'm not going to tell you the nice part of this story…
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] So, no rude.
 
[Howard] When we talked earlier, previous episode, about… Erin and I had this conversation off-line about… Sometimes we'll just read spoilers because we want to know what happens, but we still want to enjoy the story. A story is an unfolding, and it is also a telling. I can appreciate the telling without the unfolding, and I can appreciate the unfolding while not paying attention to the telling. The consuming media with that in mind, feels to me like a break with tradition. It also, and I'm just going to put a pin in this, argues really well for this book, because it is so well told. The telling is so much more than the unfolding.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Howard] That's why we would encourage you to read it more than once.
 
[DongWon] I have one question that's a little bit of a pivot. As a publisher, I've talked about this a lot on podcasts and elsewhere, I think in comp titles. Right? I'm inherently wired to think, this book is like these other books. This book is in conversation with these other books. I'm curious, as a writer, are you guys actively thinking about lineage in that way, or, like, canon in that way, and the idea that a canon can be a personal thing. Right? In terms of, like, what you've read and where that comes from.
[Mary Robinette] Um, I mean, definitely, I've never done anything like Jane Austen with magic or The Thin Man in space…
[Laughter]
[DongWon] Yeah, that is true. Yeah. So I think you're very unaware of your influences…
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. Absolutely. Definitely never done Apollo era science fiction that was influenced by Ray Bradberry. Absolutely haven't done that. I don't know what you're talking about.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] I don't know that I… I mean, I know what I've read and if I… I could reconstruct the things that have made me who I am as a storyteller. I think it's a lot of things though. I think some of it is canon science fiction, I think some of it is barbershop tales.
[DongWon] Yep.
[Erin] I think some of it is a lot of things.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] And I do think that this is something that I a lot of times will challenge a student to do, which is to think about what has made you the storyteller that you are.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[Erin] And who are you then telling stories to?
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] I think those are two really key things, because otherwise, other people will tell you, like, when you put a book out in the world, anyone can tell you who you're in conversation with. But when you're writing it, you get to decide.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[Erin] At that moment, take the power and say, this is who I am and here is how I want to tell this tale.
 
[Howard] The better you get at reading, at comprehending what you read, the more able you are to, when you write, to consciously say, I am writing like the things I have consumed and to be able to say I am going to attempt to write unlike the things I have consumed. I am aware enough of the traditions I've been consuming that I am going to break with them and I'm going to write differently than them.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Howard] That's a… I see that as a late career skill that takes a long time to develop and you develop it by reading.
[DongWon] That's what I love about Fifth Season is it is both deeply honoring and in conversation with the traditions that it comes from, but also is so deeply interested in being like, "Uh uh, I'm doing something different."
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] Erin, I really loved what you said in terms of the books that made you a writer or, like, the things that you're in con… The stories and not even just books. Right? We're pulling from all parts of our lives. For you, that being different from the conversation that you think the audience is, like, who is this for, what books are they reading, what books will they know and understand? Then, thirdly, the one that you can't control in any way, which is, what people will actually say your book is like. Right? What people will say once it's out in the world. I think your relationship to each of those three different interpretations is really, really important. As a publisher, I'm most interested in the second one, the one that I want writers to come in with is an understanding of here's my audience, here's what they're reading, this is like that. But you understanding for yourself why you're writing this and where you're coming from I think is so important and so powerful.
[Mary Robinette] I think it is the most important thing. To know why you're writing it and who your writing it for.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Erin] Because you can lose yourself. I mean, I think it's important, you want to get published, you want your stuff out in the world. But I think if you lose hold of who you are as a storyteller, then you won't be happy with the story no matter how successful it is, no matter how many other people like the way that you told it.
[DongWon] 100 percent.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah. It is a common thing that I will see with… When I was going through the slush pile, I would see people attempting to mimic someone else.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] And seeing people thinking about what does this editor want? What does that editor want? But it is that thing about what you want… I'm also going to say one other thing about the conversations that we're having. I would not be surprised if Nora had read Crystal Singer and forgotten that she had read it, and that that turned up in the book. Because I have, when I'm gone back and reread some things, I've been like, oh, I didn't actually think about the fact that when I was writing Glamorous Histories, I'm like I'm going to do this something fresh and new with my magic, it's all going to be based on folds and threatens. Then, I'm watching Game of Thrones… Not Game of Thrones. Wheel of Time. I'm like, oh, look at them using folds and threads. No consciousness of that. But this is what we're talking about, that you can be influenced by something, it can come into the book, but it's still your own.
[DongWon] Yeah.
[Mary Robinette] It's still your own, even if you have been in conversation with something and forgot the the conversation happened.
[DongWon] This is me talking about patterns once again. That's okay, that's how stories work. We are all absorbing stories that we've read, we are all absorbing fiction that we've engaged with, and recombining it and putting it back together in our own ways. Right? So just because a reader will come up to you and be like, "Hey. This is just like that thing from… That Anne McCaffrey did," doesn't invalidate your work at all. Your work is still your work.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
[DongWon] So don't let that throw you. It's okay to have influences, it's okay to come from a place and… In fact, I think it's one of the most important things, is to recognize you come from a place and try to understand that. If you don't have a perfect understanding of it, that's fine too.
[Mary Robinette] Yeah.
 
[DongWon] With that, I have some homework for you. Very much along these lines. I want you to make a list of the books that you consider the antecedents to this book that you're working on now. What works is your book in conversation with? Are you following on and building on that foundation, or are you disrupting and pushing back on that legacy in one way or another?
 
[Mary Robinette] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses. Now go write.
 
[Howard] Have you ever wanted to ask one of the Writing Excuses hosts for very specific, very you-focused help. There's an offering on the Writing Excuses Patreon that will let you do exactly that. The Private Instruction tier includes everything from the lower tiers plus a quarterly, one-on-one Zoom meeting with a host of your choice. You might choose, for example, to work with me on your humorous prose, engage DongWon's expertise on your worldbuilding, or study with Erin to level up your game writing. Visit patreon.com/writingexcuses for more details.
 
mbarker: (Default)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 17.7: Dissecting Influence
 
 
Key points: Dissecting influence, aka learning from the things that inspire you. Find what you love, then take it apart and figure out how it works. What do you need to do to practice that? Look for commonalities, themes that call to you. Approach your self corrections with a generous heart. Pull feelings from your inspirations, and feed them into your work. Trust your voice. To avoid being too strongly influenced, go adjacent. Remember, no one can do me like me. Do your research ahead of time, and let it settle.
 
[Season 17, Episode 7]
 
[Howard] This is Writing Excuses, Dissecting Influence.
[Kaela] 15 minutes long.
[Sandra] Because you're in a hurry.
[Megan] And we're not that smart. 
[Howard] I'm Howard.
[Kaela] I'm Kaela.
[Sandra] I'm Sandra.
[Megan] And I'm Meg.
 
[Howard] This episode was pitched to us by one of our guest hosts, Megan Lloyd. Megan, take it away. What are we talking about?
[Megan] Today, we are talking about dissecting influence, which is, how do you learn from the things that inspire you. You've seen the masters of their craft create masterpieces. You want to make one of your own. What are some tips and tricks to studying how other people do the thing?
[Howard] Part of the problem is that I don't get to see them make the thing. I get to see the thing.
[Laughter. This is true.]
[Howard] It's… I mentioned this in the expectations intensive. I talk about the Dirk Gently TV show. I don't know what that writers' room looked like. I don't know what the outline looked like. But it has… It is incredibly influential to me, because of the way all of the things connect. I want to be able to build that. But I don't get to watch it being built. So how do I learn? Tell me, Meg, how do I learn from it?
[Megan] So, you've got to take the thing and you literally have to dissect it, cut it open and take all the little pieces out and you have to break it down into little bits and find out, okay, why do I like this is much as I do. While you can't see them make the thing, you may have to reverse engineer it a bit yourself. Because, I believe how they would make it and how you would make it would be very different, but you're coming to the same purpose. So, I come at this, I'm both a writer and an artist, working in the animation industry, so a lot of the references, a lot of the work that I like to look at is other visual art. So I look at something and be like, "What do I love about this? Do I love the thin line art, or do I love how they depicted the light?" A lot of what I do is, in my sketchbooks, I also write out lists of things I like and what do I need to do to practice doing this thing.
[Sandra] One thing that's coming to mind for me… Back when I was coming back into being a creative person, after a very fallow period, I kind of stopped writing when my kids were little for about nine or 10 years because I was fullbore mothering instead of being a writer. As I was coming back to creativity, I discovered a hunger for visual inspiration. Which was exactly when Pinterest launched. So I was doing Pinterest boards. They've reconfigured now, and Pinterest no longer works for me in the same way. But I was just collecting images. I was just listing… I like this, I like this, I like this. The fascinating thing about having it collected all into one space is that then I could suddenly see patterns. I could see that so many of the images I liked had an implied journey in them. A boat about to launch, a path through a wood. I realized, oh, wow, here I am trying to launch a creative career and I'm being drawn to images with an implied journey. You could pull the same thing with… If you take a look and say, "Well, I love this show, and I love the show, and I love this show. What do these shows have in common?" One of the things that I discovered I really love is a sense of comradery and found family. So you can discover what are the themes that call to you. Then, once you know what… That helps you begin to decipher why do I like this thing, what is it that draws me. Then, how can I then make sure I pull those themes into my own work.
[Megan] Yeah, I think that's a… Aggregation of themes is really helpful. I know that I definitely use that as my compass when I'm looking like… About when I want to make stuff is like first gut instinct, oh, my gosh, I love this, it resonates with me. How does it work? Sometimes, I think that like being outside of the writers' room and things like that can be a benefit in that way. Because if you're with the person, sometimes… There is a certain level where you need someone, like a mentor, or you need mentor text or things like that. But there's a point where it's not helpful, because you just do what they say without knowing why, without knowing how it connects. You're just following instructions. Versus, like opening the guts of something and, like, rummaging inside. I mean, like, "Ahah. I see. This connects to this, which makes this happen." Like, with characterization, looking at… Or with worldbuilding, like Avatar The Last Airbender, I will always bring it up, because I love it. One of my favorite things is Katara bloodbending. That was such a genius extension of how the world works, and it resonated with me so powerfully because it did the thing that I love. I dissected it, and was like, "What is it that… Why do I love Katara bloodbending so much?" I realized because it was going a step deeper, answering questions they hadn't answered before about how waterbending works. Like, yeah, there's water in blood. We've seen Katara bend her own sweat before. We've seen her bend the water out of a cloud. Like, how does that apply? It's not that we didn't talk about it before. Like, the medium was hiding it or anything. It's that we hadn't gone into it. We had… No one had asked that question before in the world at that point. I… That's why I learned like going deeper with your magic system can be very satisfying. Especially to people who have been following something and become fans of it. Whether… They started to ask themselves questions like that. It's like addressing what people might want to write fan fiction about. You're like, "Yeah. That exists. Right? Aren't you excited?" You're like, "Oh, my goodness, I am."
[Sandra] I can't remember, is Toph's metal bending before the bloodbending or after? Because it's like, one, they fold into. It's like, again, both going deeper. Well, if Toph can metal bend, then Katara can bloodbend. So you've set things up.
[Megan] It's before, because that's Toph's… That's the culmination of her storyline in the Earth book. Because Got, water, earth, and fire. Then Katara learns from a displaced water tribe woman in the Fire Nation.
[Yup. Yeah.]
[Sandra] But again, it's going deeper both times. I love it.
 
[Howard] The salient point here is not that worldbuilding by extrapolation, extension, logical conclusion is how you should world build. The salient point here is that is a thing that you loved about Avatar, so now that you know you love it, you can pick that influence apart and you can see how you want to apply that principle into your own work.
[Kaela] Yes. It's, in fact, something that inspired that principle, being able to go deeper like that, that I pulled out of Avatar the Last Airbender or something, that I'm using in the sequels to Cece Rios and The Desert of Souls.
[Howard] Cool.
[Kaela] So… Great application.
 
[Megan] To jump ahead into how do you implement this in your own work with the same level of love and interest that you take something that you love that inspires you and being able to break it down. What do I like about it? What do I not care for? Being able to approach your own work from a… I don't want to say scholarly or clinical, because honestly, we love what we do, but being able to search your own work for places it could improve without knocking yourself down as you do it. So instead of critiquing your own work, but just trying to go through and like plus and improve your own work. So always approach your self corrections with a generous heart.
[Sandra] I love… I think it's very, very easy, because the world teaches us that we should be humble and we should not toot our own horn or whatever. It's very easy to approach your own work, and, like, apologize for it is you're talking about it. I instead love it when I see creators who are just like super excited. Fanfic writers tend to be really, really good about this, because there really, really super excited about this cool thing, and they just let themselves be excited. So… When you… If you can carry that from your inspiration you're talking about. You're inspired by this thing because it excites you or it makes you cry or whatever, and if you let yourself have those same emotions about your own work, that's a beautiful way of carrying the influences and expressing them again.
[Megan] One of the reasons why I like to use the simile of dissection and study is the goal is not to plagiarize someone. The goal is not to trace someone's art to learn how to draw, or retype someone's book to learn how to write. But it's to find the familial similarities between what you love and what you do, and try to put the creative juice in your brain to think up new ways to implement your own skills.
[Sandra] Yeah. It's like you said, reverse engineering to figure out the principles that they use that you can then use. Like, if you know… It's… So you figure out the rules on a very personal level of how and why something works so that you can then use it to your advantage.
 
[Howard] I think, coming back to the worldbuilding example, I think that's why this is so important, because we talked about extrapolation in worldbuilding on Writing Excuses before. Okay? That is a principle that you can lift out of Writing Excuses and probably any number of books on writing and worldbuilding and whatever else. But if you dissect the things that have influenced you and you find that as a thing you love, now that's a principle you own. Not just something somebody has written down for you.
 
[Howard] Let's have a thing of the week. What's our thing of the week?
[Megan] I'm suggesting the thing of the week this week, which is one of my favorite things. It is the YouTube account called Sakuga which will be in the liner notes, but I'll spell it out here. Hobbes Sakuga. This YouTube channel is a collection of the very best cuts of hand-drawn animation compiled into category specific videos. So, like, 20 minutes of just special effects hand-drawn animation or sword fighting animation or dramatic character acting. Usually, when I'm stuck on a specific thing, I'll just sit and watch, well, how did 20 other of the world's greatest masters accomplish it. It gets me… Gets the brain moving and the juices flowing, and it helps me when I go back to my own drawing board.
 
[Sandra] This is a thing that comes very, very naturally to like dancers or musicians, the idea that you just need to go through the motions over and over until you create a muscle memory. You can do the same thing as a writer or artist too. Because you have to draw things over and over. But, writers, you can also create that in your own head. So if you need to write a love scene, maybe go watch some love scenes to get your head into that space. Pull that feeling from your inspiration, so that you can then feed it into your own work. That sometimes creates an anxiety, the influence, like, oh, no, I'm copying. But that's where you trust your own voice, because every dancer can tell you that even though you're practicing over and over and over the steps the choreographer gave you, each performance becomes different. Becomes your own as you do the dance.
[Megan] Well, it's like the difference between strawberries and jam, right? Like, yeah, you're watching strawberries, but you can turn it into jam. You turn it into something else by boiling over it, by stewing over it, by making it into something new. Now, it still tastes like strawberries… It's still romance.
[Yup]
[Megan] But it has turned into something new, because it's… You have delivered it in a new way. You've done it thoughtfully by having boiled on it and stewed on it. Strange metaphor, but it was the first one I thought of.
[It's okay. Chuckles.]
[Howard] Now I want strawberry jam.
[Chuckles]
 
[Howard] How do we deal with anxiety of influence in light of this? Because I know there have been times when I was worried… I would not watch something because I would worry… I worried that it would influence me and I'd find something in it that I liked and that thing would just flat out end up in my own work. How do we avoid that?
[Sandra] For me, go adjacent. If you are writing an action scene and you're worried that if you watch kung fu movies, you will port it directly across, is there some other way that action is expressed where you can get into an action headspace without being so directly… My example is not working.
[Howard] Let me state the problem differently. I didn't watch Firefly on TV because I felt like it was too much like what I was already doing. Therefore, I just wasn't allowed to watch it. It would influence me. Same with Cowboy Bebop. People kept telling me, "Oh, you should watch this. I know you'd love it because Schlock Mercenary is so cool." I'm like, "I don't want to love it. It will undo me, influence me. Go away, stop telling me about cool stuff that is similar to what I'm doing." So the question is how do I avoid that? How do I get to have Firefly and Cowboy Bebop in my life?
[Megan] So, I have a little mantra that I tell myself. It's, "No one can do me like me." Where even though there may be similar elements, when you see the work as a whole with the different theming, the different staging, like Sandra says going adjacent, that… We write for a world that loves what we write. I'm sorry, that wasn't phrased very well, but… We are writing in our genres for genre savvy people. So, I think people may say, "Oh. Another story about an orphaned wizard named Harry? I'm not even going to pick up the Dresden Files. I know this story." You can share elements with different things. But it's the whole of it that makes it your work.
[Sandra] Well, also, if you're writing, for example, space opera, and the only other… You only consume one other space opera, the risk of you porting visibly from one thing to another… But if you have filled your head with 10 or 20 or 30 space operas and then let them all settled before you sit to write, they turn into a stew…
[Garbled jam]
[Sandra] The likelihood that you will steal specific bits becomes less. Because, Howard, your head was full of space opera already. It's just you didn't want to refresh specifically… I don't know. I don't think you're necessarily wrong for deciding to avoid those things at that time.
[Howard] I was a much happier person with Firefly when it got canceled before I'd even started it.
[Laughter]
[Sandra] But, I mean, listen to your instincts. Because if your instinct says that's not the thing for me to be watching right now, maybe it isn't.
[Howard] Yeah.
[Kaela] I would say that I am not careful about that at all. I'm not careful about any of those things at all. Mostly because I love doing my own riff on things like purposefully. But I will say when I was younger and when I was starting out, I avoided it more because I knew I was more impressionable because I didn't have a strong sense of my own voice or how I wanted to do a thing. So, then, I would just… I would make sure I wasn't writing something at the same time as reading something like it or watching something like it. I still read and watch all of those things, but I'd make sure it wasn't at the same time. Because I was very impressionable.
[Megan] Oh, yeah. That's something I want to piggyback off of is when I'm doing a specific project, I'll do all of my research ahead of time. So I'll read two or three similar books before I write one of my novels or I watch a few similar movies before I start boarding a specific scene. But once I do my initial research, unless I'm completely up against a wall and I don't know what else to do, I'll eat jam on toast instead of going to pick more strawberries from that point on out.
[Howard] Now I want toast too!
[Laughter]
[garbled words]
[Howard] Oh, no.
[Megan] But it's the best metaphor.
[Chuckles]
 
[Howard] Working quite well. Hey, it's… We're 18 and a half minutes in here. Is it time for homework, Meg?
[Megan] It's time for homework. I bet if you been listening to our episode, you might have a pretty good idea of what I'm going to ask you to do. For homework this week, take a slice of something that inspires you. Books, movies, art. Break down a list of the specific elements you find appealing.
[Howard] A slice of something, and of course it's toast.
[Laughter]
[Howard] Or thick with jam. Thank you everybody. This has been Writing Excuses. You are out of excuses. Now go write.
 
mbarker: (ISeeYou2)
[personal profile] mbarker
Writing Excuses 15.46: Crafting Chinese-American Characters
 
 
Key points: Are there representations of Chinese-American characters in media? Literature, TV, and movies do have representative characters, but it's not as deep as it could be. Mostly focusing on how do you merge the two heritages, and recent immigrants or second-generation learning about early trials. Good characters are aware of stereotypes, and control them. They are aware of language. And then there's food! Tastes, emotions, a metaphor for making connections with heritage? Comfort! Make the influences from the past little nods, spice for the character. How can you write about a culture that you didn't grow up in? Admit that this is just your viewpoint. Focus on one character, one place, don't claim that it represents everyone, just that one character's life.
 
[Transcriptionist note: (1) I may have confused Piper and Tempest. Apologies for mislabeling. (2) I may have confused emigrant and immigrant.]
 
[Mary Robinette] Season 15, Episode 46.
[Piper] This is Writing Excuses, Crafting Chinese-American Characters.
[Dan] 15 minutes long.
[Yang] Because your time is valuable.
[Laughter]
[No. No. Laughter]
[Dan] And we're not that smart.
[That just finishes… Garbled]
[No]
[Yang] See, I was a Chinese-American… [Garbled]
[Piper] Getting back to… I'm Piper.
[Dan] I'm Dan.
[Yang] I'm Yang Yang.
[Tempest] I'm Tempest.
 
[Piper] This is already off the rails. So… I get to be Howard this time. This is the best. All right, so. Welcome to the next episode… Our continuing episode about Writing the Other. We are here with Yang Yang Wang.
[Yang] Hello.
[Piper] You're so awesome. You do so many things. But, yes, when I said I want to do these episodes and we're going to do them in Seattle, Nisi Shawl, who is the godmother, the mystical goddess of Writing the Other, was, like, "You should talk to Yang Yang." So I think…
[Yang] Oh, thank you. Whoever she is.
[Laughter]
[Piper] Thank you. Thank you so much, Nisi. Yes. So tell us a little bit about yourself, as an author, is a Chinese-American, as whatever.
[Yang] So, currently, I am an author and actor. I mostly specialize in commercials. I've done everything… Every brand in the Seattle area, from like Amazon to Microsoft to Washington State Lottery. I think it's cool that I found some success in that. I feel like it's a combination of good timing and my own personal brand. I don't know if… For those who have met me, I have a very good, what they call a developer look. Believe it or not, that is very hot in Seattle.
[Chuckles, laughter]
[Yang] [garbled]… A lot of tech companies.
[Piper] In my day job, I actually work with a software development company, and I agree, you have a great developer look.
[Laughter]
[Yang] Oh, thank you. Yeah, so besides that, I've been dipping my feet into more on the production side. I wrote and directed a short film last year which took a best short film award at the Oregon independent film festival.
[Dan] Cool.
[Yang] I recently just opened a short film at the Wing Luke Museum, who's doing an exhibition on Asian Americans in science fiction. You should definitely check that out. Like, it is an amazing exhibit.
 
[Piper] Awesome. How cool. Yay. It's not often we get someone with acting and writing experience. So, I guess the first thing I want to ask is about when you're thinking about the kind of Chinese-American characters that you do see in media, whether that's like film media or even books, first of all, do you see many? And, the ones that you see, are they the kind of characters that you would say, "Yes, I enjoy that depiction. That seems amazing. I would want every person to want to look at that, forever and ever, amen."
[Yang] So, first of all, I would like to start off by saying that my opinions do not represent everyone else's opinions.
[Dan] Certainly.
[Piper] Absolutely.
[Yang] Just my own. I think, growing up, I did see Chinese-American characters in literature and on television or in movies. I would say that I did recognize them. I wouldn't say that I felt, like, misrepresented. But at the same time, I felt like it just… It waded in the shallow end of the pool, if you will. I felt like there was more that could be depicted. A lot of the narratives that I was seeing was centered around like people struggling with merging their Chinese heritage and their American heritage. It would be a story about recent immigrants or like second-generation learning about their parents' trials coming to this country. Being… So, my own story is that I came over here when I was nine years old. I felt, like, while I recognized some of the trials that those characters faced, like, I was not picked on in school anymore than anybody else. My name was not made fun of. You know, when your name's Yang Yang Wang, there's a lot of wordplay.
[Chuckles]
[garbled… Yeah, yeah… Places…]
[Yang] I picked out one of the ones I wanted to highlight is somebody called me… You know, Yankee Doodle Dandy, but they called me Yankee Doodle Wanger.
[Dan] Nice.
[Yang] But, yeah. Kids… But I'd like to, again, stress that kids being who they are, I was picked on no more or less than like any other kid at my school. So, while I recognize facets of this, I didn't think that that was the complete story. So, like for me, some of the things that I think good Chinese-American characters are highly aware of are (a) their relationship to stereotypes, like, you grow up hearing these stereotypes and you decide and you have control over how you relate to them or not relate to them, how you let them affect you or not affect you, whether you want to embrace and make it your own. Because there's that… Let's take the example of, like, martial artists. While there's that stereotype, all Chinese kids know martial arts. But some Chinese kids love martial arts. By performing martial arts, it's not that they're perpetuating the stereotype, but they are definitely aware that that stereotype exists, but they are taking control over it, and not letting it affect their love of this thing.
[Right]
[Yang] Another thing being awareness of their relationship to language. I think whether or not you speak the language that your family, your ancestors, etc., like, did, you are aware of your level of relationship to that language. Like, what do you know, like, just a couple of words? Like whether you know a phrase. Whether you can just order a couple of food dishes at a restaurant. Maybe that's enough. But for other people, like, it's not, and it's a source of like common guilt from their family, etc. But I find that language… It is definitely something that a lot of Chinese-Americans, including myself, like, are hyperaware of.
[Uhum]
 
[Yang] The last one, I mentioned it before, was food. Like…
[Laughter]
[It always comes back to food]
[Yang] Yeah, absolutely.
[So many things about my life are food.]
[I'm there for you]
[Yang] Yeah. I find that, for me, like, food is something… I consider it like a safe space, like, where people can sort of like experiment with traditional…
[Yeah]
[Yang] And like mixing different influences, like, safely. But something about, like, food that really resonates with me is growing up, even without, like, knowing what it's called, I will have experience, something… I'll have eaten something and remember the taste and certain, like, emotions around it. I might have even, like, forgotten about this, but like years later, either going to a restaurant somewhere in America or somewhere back in China, I will essentially, like, rediscover this food and maybe this whole… Maybe the whole time in the back of my mind, like, this flavor will be, like, lingering and I'll seek it, like some sort of extended metaphor for, like… I guess you could take it as an extended metaphor for, like, seeking a connection with, like, my heritage. But you don't have to. It could be for some people, it could definitely be that. But for me, it's just like seeking, like, a comfort and an emotional connection.
[Piper] oh, I think that's really relatable. Because, for example, I'm Thai-American. I was actually born here, but I spent many, many summers of my childhood in Thailand. We just went to Thailand over the past New Year, and I took my partner, Matthew, with me. It was his first time in Thailand. So, it was one of those things where as soon as we got there, I hit the streets for the vendors, looking for my favorite things that I just can't get here or I can't find here. Or if I do find it here, it's not the same flavor. I was looking for that flavor. So I think that that idea of comfort foods or that feeling... Another friend of mine, Phillipa Ballantine, who's an author in steam punk and also epic fantasy, she was just recently back in New Zealand, and she pinged me just as I was getting back from Thailand. She was in New Zealand eating foods that she hadn't had for quite some time. She had grown up in New Zealand. She's like, "There's something about eating this food that brings you home." It's really, really all about sensory, not just what you remember, but what you're smelling and you're tasting and you're feeling, the emotions associated with it. So, yeah, I absolutely agree with that.
[I feel like there's… Garbled]
[Tempest] there's not enough, I feel like, about that in depictions where it's like… Not like own voices writing, it's writing the other. About just, like, all the foods that make us feel like who we are. Because, like, food is so important to just literally everyone.
[Laughter]
[Piper] Oh, yes. I try to incorporate that a lot in my series. In fact, it got to the point where some people thought that I was… That they would be able to re-create a Chinese dish based on my Chinese-American heroine's looking that she was doing through the course of a scene that I was describing, because she stress cooks.
[Laughter]
[Piper] The only way they can get any information out of her, she's like, "Look, you want me to answer your questions? Stand there. Let me cook, and I will answer your questions clearly. If you make me try to sit down, it's not happening." But, yeah, I mean, all of my series… I have a Korean American character who does the same thing. She has comfort foods, because she ended up in the hospital. Got shot at. Or actually exploded. But anyway…
[Laughter]
[Piper] Either way… It's romantic suspense, man. But either way, it comes back to what you're saying about the food and wanted to see that and see how food brings you back… And not necessarily back, but deepens insight into who you are.
[Yeah]
[Yang] Yeah, I guess it all comes back to the fact that, like, it's like these little nods. To your… To the influences from your past. Like, it doesn't need to dominate a character. It just needs to be… It's like the spice, to go with the whole food metaphor, right?
[Yeah]
[Yang] It's like the spice to a character. But it doesn't need to be like something… The only thing that a character obsessed is about or thinks over.
 
[Piper] All right. I'm going to stop us here, because I've been politely reminded that I totally forgot…
[Oh. Garbled]
[Piper] To watch the time, and it is time for the book of the week.
[Laughter]
[Piper] That is you. Would you please tell us what the book of the week is?
[Yang] I was just reading All Systems Red by Martha Wells. I think it is probably one of the… It's got one of the best characters, Murderbot, that I've ever encountered.
[Chuckles]
[Yang] I'm super jealous, I wish I'd thought of this character first.
[Chuckles]
[Yang] I wish I could, like, steel list character and like put it in like all the settings, all the time periods that can possibly exist. Yeah, I know I'm a little late in reading this reticular one…
[It is never too late.]
[Yang] Yeah. I can't… I say that it does not diminish my enjoyment of it anyway.
[Piper] Awesome.
[Dan] That is All Systems Red by Martha Wells.
[Piper] Awesome. Thank you.
 
[Tempest] So, one of the things that I know that some people who are either from a diaspora culture or they're from… They're like [garbled] emigrants, they were brought to whatever cultures their family emigrated to when they were very young, so, like, most of their experience is in, like, the new culture, is they worry about whether or not their writing about the home culture would be considered writing the other, because it's, like, it's sort of my culture, but it's not exactly my culture, because my culture is this, the culture that I mostly grew up in, and whatever. I know that there are, like, two aspects of it, there is the aspect of, like, from the inside, the person whose, like, having that thought about themselves, but then there's also, like, the voices from the outside are like, "That's not authentic."
[Chuckles]
[Tempest] Oh, Lord, we could have a conversation about authenticity all day long, and we won't.
[Chuckles]
[Tempest] But I'm actually, like, more concerned with, like, how… What would you say to authors who, like, they're from a… They're Chinese-American or they're Indian-American or whatever. They want to write about China. They want to write about India. What are the kinds of things that they can do to feel less... or to just be aware of the complicated issues around that?
[Yang] Right. I guess, one of the first things that they can do is just acknowledge the fact that they are representing it from their own viewpoint. Like, they are not trying to assume any sort of authority over the subject matter. I mean, to be fair, even citizens from like a country, such as China, can't necessarily write about China with all the nuance and all the complexity to do it justice for various reasons. Right? But I think after going past that, it's a matter of… So, whenever I read about a character, I always think about the author. Like, I look at the back of the book and I read the little, like, blurb about who they are and where they come from, and, like, I try to think about their relationship to the subject matter. I think that as long as they have, like, the proper research and they have access they don't try to tell me that this is how the country is. As long as I can see that there's, like, room that they think the country is this way.
[Their perception is theirs]
[Yang] Their perception… Yeah. As long as there's enough of that fallibility, like… I think I'm okay with that. Because that's the best that we can do, really. Like, we are all trying to have, like, some good intent and we want to explore and we want… It's really like celebrate. Like, part of the reason why, I think, that people want to write in these other settings is that there's something about setting that enraptures them. They want other people to love it, and they think it's exciting, and they want other people to feel the same excitement. So, as long as they… Yeah, as long as… Sorry, I lost my train of thought.
[Laughter]
[That's okay]
[Dan] No, I wanted to add onto that, because I think that's great. That's one of the reasons, one of the things we talk about a lot in this series is that the more specific you get, when you're talking about one character, then you have room for that fallibility. Because I'm not trying to say all Chinese Americans are exactly like this. But this one is. Then that gives us room. It doesn't feel like were trying to represent an entire massive nation or culture, we're just trying to show you one person's life.
[Tempest] Yeah.
[Piper] Yep. That's the most important thing. Cool. Well. Thank you so much.
 
[Piper] In wrapping up, I have today's homework. This is super exciting. I love giving homework.
[Woohoo!]
[Piper] Excuse me. So, for your homework, I want you to take a culture. It can either be a real-world culture or a culture that you have made up for your books. Then, I want you to create a character that is a descendent of emigrants from that culture. Then that character comes back to the home culture. How are they experiencing the home culture? What are they seeing? Are they saying, "Oh, that's so familiar?" What are they seeing? Are they like, "I didn't know they did it like that. Grandpa didn't do it like that?" Write that scene. Just explore what it can be like to be the person who is, like, of a culture, but not of a culture inside.
[Dan] Awesome. Thank you, very much, Yang Yang, being on the episode. This was great.
[Yang] Well, thank y'all for having me.
[Piper] Thank you. All right. Listeners! You're out of excuses. Now go write.
 
[identity profile] mbarker.livejournal.com
Writing Excuses Season Four Episode 18: How to Steal for Fun and Profit

From http://www.writingexcuses.com/2010/05/09/writing-excuses-4-18-how-to-steal-for-fun-and-profit/

Key Points: All artists incorporate their experiences. History and mythology provide a mine of experiences and relationships that you can use. Avoid plagiarism, make it yours. Or hang a lantern on it, make it an homage. But don't use borrowing as a shortcut -- use it as a buttress for your originality. Try combinations!
pesky plot snatchers? )
[Brandon] I think that it's a great idea. In fact, I'm going to give our writing prompt this week as being... I want you to go... I want you to go to Howard Tayler's website, schlockmercenary.com. I want you to click the button that says "click here to instantly teraport to some place inside the archives."
[Howard] [whistle]
[Brandon] I want you to take whatever strip shows up, read the next three or four, and have it... use it mailed in with some other concept to create a new story.
[Dan] Something wholly original.
[Howard] If you can stop reading after just three or four, that's probably best for you. You don't want it to cost you hours and hours of your life.
[Dan] Otherwise, you won't get any writing done.
[Brandon] This has been Writing Excuses. You're out of excuses, now go write.

Profile

Writing Excuses Transcripts

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011 121314
15161718 192021
22232425 262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 07:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios